{"title":"人类仍然在阿帕奇知识生态中","authors":"Bridget Conley, Vernelda Grant","doi":"10.7227/hrv.8.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This edited transcript of conversations between an Apache cultural heritage\n professional, Vernelda Grant, and researcher Bridget Conley explores the\n knowledge that should guide the repatriation of human remains in the colonial\n context of repatriating Apache sacred, cultural and patrimonial items –\n including human remains – from museum collections in the United States.\n Grant provides a historical overview of the how Apache elders first grappled\n with this problem, following the passage of the Native American Graves\n Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) in the US Congress. She explains how and\n why community leaders made decisions about what items they would prioritise for\n repatriation. Central to her discussion is an Apache knowledge ecology grounded\n in recognition that the meaning of discrete items cannot be divorced from the\n larger religious and cultural context from which they come.","PeriodicalId":305864,"journal":{"name":"Human Remains and Violence","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human remains within an Apache knowledge ecology\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Conley, Vernelda Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/hrv.8.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This edited transcript of conversations between an Apache cultural heritage\\n professional, Vernelda Grant, and researcher Bridget Conley explores the\\n knowledge that should guide the repatriation of human remains in the colonial\\n context of repatriating Apache sacred, cultural and patrimonial items –\\n including human remains – from museum collections in the United States.\\n Grant provides a historical overview of the how Apache elders first grappled\\n with this problem, following the passage of the Native American Graves\\n Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) in the US Congress. She explains how and\\n why community leaders made decisions about what items they would prioritise for\\n repatriation. Central to her discussion is an Apache knowledge ecology grounded\\n in recognition that the meaning of discrete items cannot be divorced from the\\n larger religious and cultural context from which they come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Remains and Violence\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Remains and Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/hrv.8.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Remains and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/hrv.8.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This edited transcript of conversations between an Apache cultural heritage
professional, Vernelda Grant, and researcher Bridget Conley explores the
knowledge that should guide the repatriation of human remains in the colonial
context of repatriating Apache sacred, cultural and patrimonial items –
including human remains – from museum collections in the United States.
Grant provides a historical overview of the how Apache elders first grappled
with this problem, following the passage of the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) in the US Congress. She explains how and
why community leaders made decisions about what items they would prioritise for
repatriation. Central to her discussion is an Apache knowledge ecology grounded
in recognition that the meaning of discrete items cannot be divorced from the
larger religious and cultural context from which they come.