人类仍然在阿帕奇知识生态中

Bridget Conley, Vernelda Grant
{"title":"人类仍然在阿帕奇知识生态中","authors":"Bridget Conley, Vernelda Grant","doi":"10.7227/hrv.8.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This edited transcript of conversations between an Apache cultural heritage\n professional, Vernelda Grant, and researcher Bridget Conley explores the\n knowledge that should guide the repatriation of human remains in the colonial\n context of repatriating Apache sacred, cultural and patrimonial items –\n including human remains – from museum collections in the United States.\n Grant provides a historical overview of the how Apache elders first grappled\n with this problem, following the passage of the Native American Graves\n Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) in the US Congress. She explains how and\n why community leaders made decisions about what items they would prioritise for\n repatriation. Central to her discussion is an Apache knowledge ecology grounded\n in recognition that the meaning of discrete items cannot be divorced from the\n larger religious and cultural context from which they come.","PeriodicalId":305864,"journal":{"name":"Human Remains and Violence","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human remains within an Apache knowledge ecology\",\"authors\":\"Bridget Conley, Vernelda Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/hrv.8.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This edited transcript of conversations between an Apache cultural heritage\\n professional, Vernelda Grant, and researcher Bridget Conley explores the\\n knowledge that should guide the repatriation of human remains in the colonial\\n context of repatriating Apache sacred, cultural and patrimonial items –\\n including human remains – from museum collections in the United States.\\n Grant provides a historical overview of the how Apache elders first grappled\\n with this problem, following the passage of the Native American Graves\\n Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) in the US Congress. She explains how and\\n why community leaders made decisions about what items they would prioritise for\\n repatriation. Central to her discussion is an Apache knowledge ecology grounded\\n in recognition that the meaning of discrete items cannot be divorced from the\\n larger religious and cultural context from which they come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Remains and Violence\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Remains and Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/hrv.8.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Remains and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/hrv.8.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文编辑了阿帕奇文化遗产专家Vernelda Grant和研究人员Bridget Conley之间的对话记录,探讨了在美国博物馆收藏的阿帕奇神圣、文化和遗产物品(包括人类遗骸)归还的殖民背景下,应该指导人类遗骸归还的知识。格兰特从历史上回顾了阿帕奇长老们是如何在美国国会通过《美洲原住民坟墓保护和遣返法案》(1990年)后第一次解决这个问题的。她解释了社区领导人如何以及为什么决定他们将优先遣返哪些物品。她讨论的核心是阿帕奇知识生态,其基础是认识到离散项目的意义不能脱离它们所来自的更大的宗教和文化背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human remains within an Apache knowledge ecology
This edited transcript of conversations between an Apache cultural heritage professional, Vernelda Grant, and researcher Bridget Conley explores the knowledge that should guide the repatriation of human remains in the colonial context of repatriating Apache sacred, cultural and patrimonial items – including human remains – from museum collections in the United States. Grant provides a historical overview of the how Apache elders first grappled with this problem, following the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) in the US Congress. She explains how and why community leaders made decisions about what items they would prioritise for repatriation. Central to her discussion is an Apache knowledge ecology grounded in recognition that the meaning of discrete items cannot be divorced from the larger religious and cultural context from which they come.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信