在与卢妮卡·马努斯帕纳分析后提出一些建议

A. Bauer
{"title":"在与卢妮卡·马努斯帕纳分析后提出一些建议","authors":"A. Bauer","doi":"10.33063/DIVA-438868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The corpus of scandinavian runica manuscripta covers a period of about 1000 years and utilises different systems of reference depending on the time and place of origin. Most of the runica manuscripta , however, originate from the post­reformation period, i.e. from a time in which runic writing had long since lost its importance as a tool of communication in favor of the latin alphabet. scholars working with runica manuscripta need to keep in mind a general consideration, i.e. that manuscript runes always represent a divergence from genuine runic writing due to their medium, which causes the runic graphs to undergo a realization different from that found in epigraphic records. The ductus of manuscript tradition is transferred to the runes, which very frequently show a tendency to resemble squiggles through the use of serifs or rounded and curv ed forms. As a result, the peculiar visual style of runic writing can be greatly distorted. even if some of the records correspond quite closely to the epigraphic tradition, in most cases a mix of runic and latin literacy can be observed, depending of course on the cultural background of the writers, who lived and acted in a ‘latinized’ writing culture. For this reason, a large range of forms has arisen and, in building the corpus—or better the different corpora—scholars must constantly ponder the extent to which they will accept a devi­ ation from the standard as a special realization of a basic graph type or will simply declare it a pseudo­rune.","PeriodicalId":189256,"journal":{"name":"Reading Runes: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Runes and Runic Inscriptions, Nyköping, Sweden, 2–6 September 2014","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbeiten mit Runica manuscripta: Einige Überlegungen zu Corpuserstellung und Vorgehensweise\",\"authors\":\"A. Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.33063/DIVA-438868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The corpus of scandinavian runica manuscripta covers a period of about 1000 years and utilises different systems of reference depending on the time and place of origin. Most of the runica manuscripta , however, originate from the post­reformation period, i.e. from a time in which runic writing had long since lost its importance as a tool of communication in favor of the latin alphabet. scholars working with runica manuscripta need to keep in mind a general consideration, i.e. that manuscript runes always represent a divergence from genuine runic writing due to their medium, which causes the runic graphs to undergo a realization different from that found in epigraphic records. The ductus of manuscript tradition is transferred to the runes, which very frequently show a tendency to resemble squiggles through the use of serifs or rounded and curv ed forms. As a result, the peculiar visual style of runic writing can be greatly distorted. even if some of the records correspond quite closely to the epigraphic tradition, in most cases a mix of runic and latin literacy can be observed, depending of course on the cultural background of the writers, who lived and acted in a ‘latinized’ writing culture. For this reason, a large range of forms has arisen and, in building the corpus—or better the different corpora—scholars must constantly ponder the extent to which they will accept a devi­ ation from the standard as a special realization of a basic graph type or will simply declare it a pseudo­rune.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading Runes: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Runes and Runic Inscriptions, Nyköping, Sweden, 2–6 September 2014\",\"volume\":\"220 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading Runes: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Runes and Runic Inscriptions, Nyköping, Sweden, 2–6 September 2014\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33063/DIVA-438868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Runes: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Runes and Runic Inscriptions, Nyköping, Sweden, 2–6 September 2014","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33063/DIVA-438868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯堪的纳维亚文献手抄本的语料库涵盖了大约1000年的时间,并根据起源的时间和地点使用不同的参考系统。然而,大多数的符文手稿来自改革后的时期,也就是说,在这个时期,符文书写早已失去了作为交流工具的重要性,取而代之的是拉丁字母。研究符文手稿的学者需要记住一个普遍的考虑,即,手稿符文总是代表着与真正的符文写作的分歧,因为它们的媒介,这导致符文图形经历了与铭文记录不同的实现。手稿传统的导管被转移到符文上,符文通过使用衬线或圆形和弯曲的形式,经常表现出类似于潦草的趋势。因此,符文文字特有的视觉风格可能会被极大地扭曲。即使一些记录与铭文传统非常接近,在大多数情况下,可以观察到符文和拉丁语的混合读写能力,当然这取决于作者的文化背景,他们生活和行为在“拉丁化”的写作文化中。由于这个原因,出现了大量的形式,在建立语料库——或者更好的是不同的语料库——学者们必须不断思考,他们将接受偏离标准的程度,将其作为基本图形类型的特殊实现,还是将其简单地宣布为伪符文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbeiten mit Runica manuscripta: Einige Überlegungen zu Corpuserstellung und Vorgehensweise
The corpus of scandinavian runica manuscripta covers a period of about 1000 years and utilises different systems of reference depending on the time and place of origin. Most of the runica manuscripta , however, originate from the post­reformation period, i.e. from a time in which runic writing had long since lost its importance as a tool of communication in favor of the latin alphabet. scholars working with runica manuscripta need to keep in mind a general consideration, i.e. that manuscript runes always represent a divergence from genuine runic writing due to their medium, which causes the runic graphs to undergo a realization different from that found in epigraphic records. The ductus of manuscript tradition is transferred to the runes, which very frequently show a tendency to resemble squiggles through the use of serifs or rounded and curv ed forms. As a result, the peculiar visual style of runic writing can be greatly distorted. even if some of the records correspond quite closely to the epigraphic tradition, in most cases a mix of runic and latin literacy can be observed, depending of course on the cultural background of the writers, who lived and acted in a ‘latinized’ writing culture. For this reason, a large range of forms has arisen and, in building the corpus—or better the different corpora—scholars must constantly ponder the extent to which they will accept a devi­ ation from the standard as a special realization of a basic graph type or will simply declare it a pseudo­rune.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信