灵活的BFT:将BFT协议设计与故障模型分离(主题演讲)

D. Malkhi
{"title":"灵活的BFT:将BFT协议设计与故障模型分离(主题演讲)","authors":"D. Malkhi","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2019.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) protocols designed for building replicated services collapse if deployed under settings that differ from the fault model they are designed for. For example, in a partialsynchrony model, a known lower bound for BFT is 1/3. Optimal-resilience solutions completely break if the fraction of Byzantine faults exceeds 1/3. The only way we know to achieve > 1/3 resilience is by assuming synchrony, but this requires the protocol to be designed with that assumption. Flexible BFT is a new approach to BFT protocol design that separates between the fault model and the solution. Clients in Flexible BFT specify (i) the adversarial threshold they need to tolerate, and (ii) whether they believe in synchrony (and the presumed bound on transmission delays). We present a Flexible BFT solution that simultaneously supports different clients, who differ simply by the number of messages and/or time the clients are willing to wait for. At an even finer grain, Flexible BFT supports under the same solution high-value and low-value transactions, each tolerating a different threat model. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms","PeriodicalId":174732,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible BFT: Separating BFT Protocol Design from the Fault Model (Keynote Lecture)\",\"authors\":\"D. Malkhi\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2019.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) protocols designed for building replicated services collapse if deployed under settings that differ from the fault model they are designed for. For example, in a partialsynchrony model, a known lower bound for BFT is 1/3. Optimal-resilience solutions completely break if the fraction of Byzantine faults exceeds 1/3. The only way we know to achieve > 1/3 resilience is by assuming synchrony, but this requires the protocol to be designed with that assumption. Flexible BFT is a new approach to BFT protocol design that separates between the fault model and the solution. Clients in Flexible BFT specify (i) the adversarial threshold they need to tolerate, and (ii) whether they believe in synchrony (and the presumed bound on transmission delays). We present a Flexible BFT solution that simultaneously supports different clients, who differ simply by the number of messages and/or time the clients are willing to wait for. At an even finer grain, Flexible BFT supports under the same solution high-value and low-value transactions, each tolerating a different threat model. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms\",\"PeriodicalId\":174732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2019.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2019.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为构建复制服务而设计的拜占庭容错(BFT)协议,如果在与其设计的故障模型不同的设置下部署,就会崩溃。例如,在部分同步模型中,已知BFT的下界是1/3。当拜占庭断层的比例超过1/3时,最优弹性解决方案将完全失效。我们知道实现> 1/3弹性的唯一方法是假设同步,但这需要根据该假设设计协议。灵活的BFT是一种分离故障模型和解决方案的BFT协议设计新方法。灵活BFT中的客户端指定(i)他们需要容忍的对抗阈值,以及(ii)他们是否相信同步(以及传输延迟的假定界限)。我们提出了一种灵活的BFT解决方案,可以同时支持不同的客户端,这些客户端只是由于消息数量和/或客户端愿意等待的时间而有所不同。在更精细的层面上,Flexible BFT在相同的解决方案下支持高价值和低价值的事务,每个事务都可以承受不同的威胁模型。2012 ACM学科分类计算理论→分布式算法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flexible BFT: Separating BFT Protocol Design from the Fault Model (Keynote Lecture)
Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) protocols designed for building replicated services collapse if deployed under settings that differ from the fault model they are designed for. For example, in a partialsynchrony model, a known lower bound for BFT is 1/3. Optimal-resilience solutions completely break if the fraction of Byzantine faults exceeds 1/3. The only way we know to achieve > 1/3 resilience is by assuming synchrony, but this requires the protocol to be designed with that assumption. Flexible BFT is a new approach to BFT protocol design that separates between the fault model and the solution. Clients in Flexible BFT specify (i) the adversarial threshold they need to tolerate, and (ii) whether they believe in synchrony (and the presumed bound on transmission delays). We present a Flexible BFT solution that simultaneously supports different clients, who differ simply by the number of messages and/or time the clients are willing to wait for. At an even finer grain, Flexible BFT supports under the same solution high-value and low-value transactions, each tolerating a different threat model. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信