从马克斯·雷格管弦乐作品分析对“大目标”的阐释

M. Dimitrijevic
{"title":"从马克斯·雷格管弦乐作品分析对“大目标”的阐释","authors":"M. Dimitrijevic","doi":"10.2979/INDITHEOREVI.34.1-2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the vivid fin-de-siècle Austro-German music scene marked by the Wagner-Brahms controversy, Max Reger (1873−1916) was recognized as a leading figure—the equal of Richard Strauss, Arnold Schoenberg and Gustav Mahler, if not, at times, even more conspicuous than them. It is therefore rather strange that shortly after Reger’s premature death, he nearly fell into oblivion outside the Austro-German musical sphere. One of the goals of the following analysis is to draw attention to or revive the interest of scholars and analysts in Reger’s music. During his Munich years (1901−7), Reger stood out as an uncompromising defender of absolute music and an enthusiastic modernist. In his most advanced works composed during this period, Reger undermined tonality, reaching the very border of atonality. On the other hand, he constantly maintained an intense and profound dialogue with the musical past—in particular with Bach and Brahms, whose mastery of motivic organization is readily recognized in Reger’s work. This makes Reger a typical representative of historicist modernism.1 Indeed, throughout his works, Reger combines an innovative harmonic language, marked by dense chromaticism, fractured harmonic progressions, disintegration of the traditional syntax, and prevalence of motivic logic, with classical harmonic and formal procedures. Even in his orchestral works which are considered to be","PeriodicalId":363428,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Theory Review","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elaboration of the Grundgestalt through an Analysis of Max Reger's Orchestral Works\",\"authors\":\"M. Dimitrijevic\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/INDITHEOREVI.34.1-2.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the vivid fin-de-siècle Austro-German music scene marked by the Wagner-Brahms controversy, Max Reger (1873−1916) was recognized as a leading figure—the equal of Richard Strauss, Arnold Schoenberg and Gustav Mahler, if not, at times, even more conspicuous than them. It is therefore rather strange that shortly after Reger’s premature death, he nearly fell into oblivion outside the Austro-German musical sphere. One of the goals of the following analysis is to draw attention to or revive the interest of scholars and analysts in Reger’s music. During his Munich years (1901−7), Reger stood out as an uncompromising defender of absolute music and an enthusiastic modernist. In his most advanced works composed during this period, Reger undermined tonality, reaching the very border of atonality. On the other hand, he constantly maintained an intense and profound dialogue with the musical past—in particular with Bach and Brahms, whose mastery of motivic organization is readily recognized in Reger’s work. This makes Reger a typical representative of historicist modernism.1 Indeed, throughout his works, Reger combines an innovative harmonic language, marked by dense chromaticism, fractured harmonic progressions, disintegration of the traditional syntax, and prevalence of motivic logic, with classical harmonic and formal procedures. Even in his orchestral works which are considered to be\",\"PeriodicalId\":363428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana Theory Review\",\"volume\":\"266 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana Theory Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDITHEOREVI.34.1-2.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Theory Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDITHEOREVI.34.1-2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在以瓦格纳-勃拉姆斯之争为标志的生动的奥地利-德国音乐舞台上,马克斯·雷格尔(1873 - 1916)被认为是一个领军人物,与理查德·施特劳斯、阿诺德·勋伯格和古斯塔夫·马勒齐名,有时甚至比他们更引人注目。因此,在雷格尔英年早逝后不久,他几乎在奥德音乐领域之外被遗忘,这是相当奇怪的。以下分析的目的之一是提请注意或恢复学者和分析家对雷格音乐的兴趣。在他的慕尼黑岁月(1901 - 7)里,雷格作为绝对音乐的坚定捍卫者和热情的现代主义者脱颖而出。在他这一时期创作的最先进的作品中,雷格削弱了调性,达到了无调性的边缘。另一方面,他不断地与过去的音乐保持着激烈而深刻的对话,特别是与巴赫和勃拉姆斯,他们对动机组织的掌握在雷格尔的作品中很容易得到认可。这使雷格尔成为历史主义现代主义的典型代表事实上,在他的作品中,Reger将一种创新的和声语言与古典的和声和形式程序相结合,这种语言以密集的全音性、断裂的和声进行、传统句法的解体和动机逻辑的盛行为特征。甚至在他的管弦乐作品中也被认为是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elaboration of the Grundgestalt through an Analysis of Max Reger's Orchestral Works
At the vivid fin-de-siècle Austro-German music scene marked by the Wagner-Brahms controversy, Max Reger (1873−1916) was recognized as a leading figure—the equal of Richard Strauss, Arnold Schoenberg and Gustav Mahler, if not, at times, even more conspicuous than them. It is therefore rather strange that shortly after Reger’s premature death, he nearly fell into oblivion outside the Austro-German musical sphere. One of the goals of the following analysis is to draw attention to or revive the interest of scholars and analysts in Reger’s music. During his Munich years (1901−7), Reger stood out as an uncompromising defender of absolute music and an enthusiastic modernist. In his most advanced works composed during this period, Reger undermined tonality, reaching the very border of atonality. On the other hand, he constantly maintained an intense and profound dialogue with the musical past—in particular with Bach and Brahms, whose mastery of motivic organization is readily recognized in Reger’s work. This makes Reger a typical representative of historicist modernism.1 Indeed, throughout his works, Reger combines an innovative harmonic language, marked by dense chromaticism, fractured harmonic progressions, disintegration of the traditional syntax, and prevalence of motivic logic, with classical harmonic and formal procedures. Even in his orchestral works which are considered to be
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信