面向软件度量和指示器的本体,作为编目Web系统的基础

María de los Ángeles Martín, L. Olsina
{"title":"面向软件度量和指示器的本体,作为编目Web系统的基础","authors":"María de los Ángeles Martín, L. Olsina","doi":"10.1109/LAWEB.2003.1250288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So that the software and Web measurement field can become a more robust engineering discipline, it is mandatory to start reaching a common agreement between researchers and other stakeholders about primitive concepts such as attribute, metric, measure, measurement and calculation method, scale, elementary and global indicator, calculable concept, among others. There are various useful recently-issued ISO standards related to software quality models, measurement and evaluation processes, however, we observe sometimes a lack of a sound consensus among the same terms in different documents or sometimes absent terms. We present an ontology for software metrics and indicators-based as much as possible on the concepts of those standards, which can be useful to support different assurance processes, methods and tools in addition to being the foundation for our cataloging Web system [Olsina, L et al., (2003)]. Without sound and consensuated definitions it is difficult to assure metadata consistency and, ultimately, data values are comparable on the same basis.","PeriodicalId":376743,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS 3rd International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices (IEEE Cat. No.03EX726)","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an ontology for software metrics and indicators as the foundation for a cataloging Web system\",\"authors\":\"María de los Ángeles Martín, L. Olsina\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LAWEB.2003.1250288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"So that the software and Web measurement field can become a more robust engineering discipline, it is mandatory to start reaching a common agreement between researchers and other stakeholders about primitive concepts such as attribute, metric, measure, measurement and calculation method, scale, elementary and global indicator, calculable concept, among others. There are various useful recently-issued ISO standards related to software quality models, measurement and evaluation processes, however, we observe sometimes a lack of a sound consensus among the same terms in different documents or sometimes absent terms. We present an ontology for software metrics and indicators-based as much as possible on the concepts of those standards, which can be useful to support different assurance processes, methods and tools in addition to being the foundation for our cataloging Web system [Olsina, L et al., (2003)]. Without sound and consensuated definitions it is difficult to assure metadata consistency and, ultimately, data values are comparable on the same basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS 3rd International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices (IEEE Cat. No.03EX726)\",\"volume\":\"271 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS 3rd International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices (IEEE Cat. No.03EX726)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWEB.2003.1250288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS 3rd International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices (IEEE Cat. No.03EX726)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWEB.2003.1250288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

为了使软件和Web测量领域成为一个更强大的工程学科,必须开始在研究人员和其他利益相关者之间就基本概念(如属性、度量、度量、测量和计算方法、尺度、基本和全局指标、可计算概念等)达成共同协议。最近发布了各种有用的与软件质量模型、度量和评估过程相关的ISO标准,然而,我们观察到有时在不同文档中的相同术语之间缺乏健全的共识,或者有时缺少术语。我们提出了一个基于这些标准概念的软件度量和指标的本体,除了作为编目Web系统的基础之外,它还可以用于支持不同的保证过程、方法和工具[Olsina, L等人,(2003)]。如果没有可靠和一致的定义,就很难确保元数据的一致性,最终,数据值在同一基础上具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards an ontology for software metrics and indicators as the foundation for a cataloging Web system
So that the software and Web measurement field can become a more robust engineering discipline, it is mandatory to start reaching a common agreement between researchers and other stakeholders about primitive concepts such as attribute, metric, measure, measurement and calculation method, scale, elementary and global indicator, calculable concept, among others. There are various useful recently-issued ISO standards related to software quality models, measurement and evaluation processes, however, we observe sometimes a lack of a sound consensus among the same terms in different documents or sometimes absent terms. We present an ontology for software metrics and indicators-based as much as possible on the concepts of those standards, which can be useful to support different assurance processes, methods and tools in addition to being the foundation for our cataloging Web system [Olsina, L et al., (2003)]. Without sound and consensuated definitions it is difficult to assure metadata consistency and, ultimately, data values are comparable on the same basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信