与主题的联系:可持续公共合同的玻璃天花板?

A. Semple
{"title":"与主题的联系:可持续公共合同的玻璃天花板?","authors":"A. Semple","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2565051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reform of the EU procurement directives has introduced or refined a number of techniques for sustainable public contracting. However it has also applied a general limiting principle in the form of the ‘link to the subject-matter’ (LtSM) requirement, derived from the case law of the Court of Justice. This limiting principle is intended to restrict the ability of contracting authorities to apply general corporate sustainability requirements or preferences in their procurement. This paper examines the origins and possible justifications for the LtSM requirement, questioning its coherence and clarity. It then turns to an analysis of how it may restrict the effectiveness of sustainability criteria in public contracts, drawing on examples related to renewable energy generation, transport emissions and fair trade products. An alternative approach is outlined based upon a looser interpretation of the requirement, supported by an understanding that procurement decisions do not constitute a form of regulation but are uniquely placed to test the effectiveness of measures for sustainable production and consumption.","PeriodicalId":204209,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Energy Politics (Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Link to the Subject-Matter: A Glass Ceiling for Sustainable Public Contracts?\",\"authors\":\"A. Semple\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2565051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reform of the EU procurement directives has introduced or refined a number of techniques for sustainable public contracting. However it has also applied a general limiting principle in the form of the ‘link to the subject-matter’ (LtSM) requirement, derived from the case law of the Court of Justice. This limiting principle is intended to restrict the ability of contracting authorities to apply general corporate sustainability requirements or preferences in their procurement. This paper examines the origins and possible justifications for the LtSM requirement, questioning its coherence and clarity. It then turns to an analysis of how it may restrict the effectiveness of sustainability criteria in public contracts, drawing on examples related to renewable energy generation, transport emissions and fair trade products. An alternative approach is outlined based upon a looser interpretation of the requirement, supported by an understanding that procurement decisions do not constitute a form of regulation but are uniquely placed to test the effectiveness of measures for sustainable production and consumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Energy Politics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Energy Politics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2565051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Energy Politics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2565051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

欧盟采购指令的改革引进或改进了一些可持续公共合同的技术。然而,它也采用了一项一般的限制原则,即“与主题事项的联系”(LtSM)要求,该要求源自法院的判例法。这一限制原则旨在限制订约当局在其采购中适用一般公司可持续性要求或偏好的能力。本文考察了LtSM要求的起源和可能的理由,质疑其连贯性和清晰度。然后,它转向分析它如何限制公共合同中可持续性标准的有效性,并借鉴了与可再生能源发电、运输排放和公平贸易产品相关的例子。另一种办法是根据对这项要求的较宽松的解释,并根据一项了解,即采购决定不构成一种管制形式,而是在检验可持续生产和消费措施的有效性方面具有独特的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Link to the Subject-Matter: A Glass Ceiling for Sustainable Public Contracts?
The reform of the EU procurement directives has introduced or refined a number of techniques for sustainable public contracting. However it has also applied a general limiting principle in the form of the ‘link to the subject-matter’ (LtSM) requirement, derived from the case law of the Court of Justice. This limiting principle is intended to restrict the ability of contracting authorities to apply general corporate sustainability requirements or preferences in their procurement. This paper examines the origins and possible justifications for the LtSM requirement, questioning its coherence and clarity. It then turns to an analysis of how it may restrict the effectiveness of sustainability criteria in public contracts, drawing on examples related to renewable energy generation, transport emissions and fair trade products. An alternative approach is outlined based upon a looser interpretation of the requirement, supported by an understanding that procurement decisions do not constitute a form of regulation but are uniquely placed to test the effectiveness of measures for sustainable production and consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信