LNG/LH2加注作业安全性比较分析

Charalampos Tofalos, B. Jeong, Hayoung Jang
{"title":"LNG/LH2加注作业安全性比较分析","authors":"Charalampos Tofalos, B. Jeong, Hayoung Jang","doi":"10.1080/25725084.2020.1840859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper was to conduct a comparative analysis between two credible marine fuels: LNG and hydrogen from safety perspective. As the first step, a bulk carrier 80,000 DWT Kamsarmax was selected as the case ship, whereas the conceptual design of retrofitting the bunkering system was implemented. In order to gain important insights into risk levels of those fuels associated with bunkering, accidental fire/explosion scenarios were developed, and the potential risks of those adverse situations were quantified. The results were interpreted as a form of the levels of safety zones applicable for bunkering. As the first attempt to compare the risk of two promising marine fuels, this paper is highly believed to give some meaningful insights into proper understanding of risk levels, thereby establishing safety practices and conducting future regulatory frameworks to mitigate those risks accordingly.","PeriodicalId":261809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety comparison analysis between LNG/LH2 for bunkering operation\",\"authors\":\"Charalampos Tofalos, B. Jeong, Hayoung Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25725084.2020.1840859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper was to conduct a comparative analysis between two credible marine fuels: LNG and hydrogen from safety perspective. As the first step, a bulk carrier 80,000 DWT Kamsarmax was selected as the case ship, whereas the conceptual design of retrofitting the bunkering system was implemented. In order to gain important insights into risk levels of those fuels associated with bunkering, accidental fire/explosion scenarios were developed, and the potential risks of those adverse situations were quantified. The results were interpreted as a form of the levels of safety zones applicable for bunkering. As the first attempt to compare the risk of two promising marine fuels, this paper is highly believed to give some meaningful insights into proper understanding of risk levels, thereby establishing safety practices and conducting future regulatory frameworks to mitigate those risks accordingly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2020.1840859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2020.1840859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本文从安全性的角度对LNG和氢气两种可靠的船用燃料进行比较分析。作为第一步,选择了80,000 DWT Kamsarmax散货船作为案例船,并实施了加注系统改造的概念设计。为了获得与加注有关的这些燃料的风险水平的重要见解,开发了意外火灾/爆炸场景,并对这些不利情况的潜在风险进行了量化。这些结果被解释为适用于掩体的安全区等级的一种形式。作为比较两种有前景的船用燃料风险的第一次尝试,本文被高度认为对正确理解风险水平提供了一些有意义的见解,从而建立安全实践并指导未来的监管框架,以相应减轻这些风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety comparison analysis between LNG/LH2 for bunkering operation
ABSTRACT This paper was to conduct a comparative analysis between two credible marine fuels: LNG and hydrogen from safety perspective. As the first step, a bulk carrier 80,000 DWT Kamsarmax was selected as the case ship, whereas the conceptual design of retrofitting the bunkering system was implemented. In order to gain important insights into risk levels of those fuels associated with bunkering, accidental fire/explosion scenarios were developed, and the potential risks of those adverse situations were quantified. The results were interpreted as a form of the levels of safety zones applicable for bunkering. As the first attempt to compare the risk of two promising marine fuels, this paper is highly believed to give some meaningful insights into proper understanding of risk levels, thereby establishing safety practices and conducting future regulatory frameworks to mitigate those risks accordingly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信