Amin Saberi, Mehrdad Gazanchian, R. Sadeghi, A. Eshraghi
{"title":"血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无再流的预测指标:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Amin Saberi, Mehrdad Gazanchian, R. Sadeghi, A. Eshraghi","doi":"10.22038/JCTM.2019.39393.1219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: No-reflow increases the complications and mortality rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it is important to identify patients at a higher risk of developing no-reflow. This study aimed to systematically review the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) to predict no-reflow. Materials and Methods: The databases, such as Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge were searched for the relevant studies. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. In this meta-analysis, sensitivity and specificity of PLR, as well as the pooled odds ratio were calculated to predict no-reflow and compared with the pooled means of PLR in no-reflow and reflow groups. Results: According to the results obtained from six out of eight studies in this systematic review, there was a significant association between PLR and no-reflow. Moreover, a pooled six-fold increase of no-reflow risk was observed in the high PLR group. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PLR to predict no-reflow was 65% (CI95%: 61%-69%) and 77% (CI95%: 76%-79%), respectively. The mean pooled of PLR in the no-reflow group was significantly 65.2 (CI95%: 26.7-103.8) units higher than that in the reflow group. Conclusions: The PLR is a significant predictor of no-reflow in STEMI patients subjected to primary PCI which can be used alone or in combination with other markers to identify patients at higher risk of developing no-reflow.","PeriodicalId":131413,"journal":{"name":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Amin Saberi, Mehrdad Gazanchian, R. Sadeghi, A. Eshraghi\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/JCTM.2019.39393.1219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: No-reflow increases the complications and mortality rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it is important to identify patients at a higher risk of developing no-reflow. This study aimed to systematically review the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) to predict no-reflow. Materials and Methods: The databases, such as Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge were searched for the relevant studies. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. In this meta-analysis, sensitivity and specificity of PLR, as well as the pooled odds ratio were calculated to predict no-reflow and compared with the pooled means of PLR in no-reflow and reflow groups. Results: According to the results obtained from six out of eight studies in this systematic review, there was a significant association between PLR and no-reflow. Moreover, a pooled six-fold increase of no-reflow risk was observed in the high PLR group. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PLR to predict no-reflow was 65% (CI95%: 61%-69%) and 77% (CI95%: 76%-79%), respectively. The mean pooled of PLR in the no-reflow group was significantly 65.2 (CI95%: 26.7-103.8) units higher than that in the reflow group. Conclusions: The PLR is a significant predictor of no-reflow in STEMI patients subjected to primary PCI which can be used alone or in combination with other markers to identify patients at higher risk of developing no-reflow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/JCTM.2019.39393.1219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JCTM.2019.39393.1219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
无再流增加了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的并发症和死亡率。因此,鉴别出无血流倒流风险较高的患者是很重要的。本研究旨在系统回顾血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)在预测无血流的预后价值。材料与方法:检索Pubmed、EMBASE、Web of Knowledge等数据库进行相关研究。两位作者独立进行了纳入研究的数据提取和质量评估。在本荟萃分析中,计算PLR的敏感性和特异性,以及合并优势比来预测无再流,并与无再流组和再流组PLR的合并平均值进行比较。结果:根据本系统综述中8项研究中6项的结果,PLR和无血流倒流之间存在显著关联。此外,在高PLR组中观察到无再流风险增加了6倍。PLR预测无血流再流的敏感性和特异性分别为65% (CI95%: 61%-69%)和77% (CI95%: 76%-79%)。无血流灌注组PLR平均池比血流灌注组高65.2 (CI95%: 26.7-103.8)个单位。结论:PLR是STEMI患者行首次PCI后无血流循环的重要预测指标,可单独使用或与其他标志物联合使用,以识别无血流循环风险较高的患者。
Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction: No-reflow increases the complications and mortality rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it is important to identify patients at a higher risk of developing no-reflow. This study aimed to systematically review the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) to predict no-reflow. Materials and Methods: The databases, such as Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge were searched for the relevant studies. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. In this meta-analysis, sensitivity and specificity of PLR, as well as the pooled odds ratio were calculated to predict no-reflow and compared with the pooled means of PLR in no-reflow and reflow groups. Results: According to the results obtained from six out of eight studies in this systematic review, there was a significant association between PLR and no-reflow. Moreover, a pooled six-fold increase of no-reflow risk was observed in the high PLR group. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PLR to predict no-reflow was 65% (CI95%: 61%-69%) and 77% (CI95%: 76%-79%), respectively. The mean pooled of PLR in the no-reflow group was significantly 65.2 (CI95%: 26.7-103.8) units higher than that in the reflow group. Conclusions: The PLR is a significant predictor of no-reflow in STEMI patients subjected to primary PCI which can be used alone or in combination with other markers to identify patients at higher risk of developing no-reflow.