美国首次代币发行的描述性分析

Aparna Gupta, Jyothsna Harithsa, O. Seneviratne
{"title":"美国首次代币发行的描述性分析","authors":"Aparna Gupta, Jyothsna Harithsa, O. Seneviratne","doi":"10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) are blockchain-based crowdfunding ventures to facilitate access to capital. Blockchain technology promises to solve many present-day problems, however, in the past three years, a diminished crypto-currency activity and fraudulent undertakings have raised some concerns. Using a novel, hand-collected dataset, we study a range of characteristics of US-based ICO tokens, starting with the first token launched in 2015 till December 2019. The price of ICO tokens was at its highest in 2017, followed by a sharp decline in 2018 and a slow recovery since. Presence of Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and White-list due diligence procedures can be associated with an ICO receiving a higher rating from experts and a higher level of social media followers. On the other hand, an ICO’s utilization of an incentive program, such as offering bonuses and bounties, is associated with higher rating by experts, but a lower level of social media following. Following the 2018 cryptocurrency slump, teams have increased the percentage of tokens kept in lock-up to prevent large market supplies that result in a slump as before and to signal their long-term commitment to the project. ICOs’ ratings and prices show contradictory characteristics, where blockchain infrastructure, healthcare, and marketplace domain tokens attracted lowest prices while being rated the highest, whereas the converse was true for energy tokens.","PeriodicalId":315392,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Descriptive Analysis of US Initial Coin Offerings\",\"authors\":\"Aparna Gupta, Jyothsna Harithsa, O. Seneviratne\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) are blockchain-based crowdfunding ventures to facilitate access to capital. Blockchain technology promises to solve many present-day problems, however, in the past three years, a diminished crypto-currency activity and fraudulent undertakings have raised some concerns. Using a novel, hand-collected dataset, we study a range of characteristics of US-based ICO tokens, starting with the first token launched in 2015 till December 2019. The price of ICO tokens was at its highest in 2017, followed by a sharp decline in 2018 and a slow recovery since. Presence of Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and White-list due diligence procedures can be associated with an ICO receiving a higher rating from experts and a higher level of social media followers. On the other hand, an ICO’s utilization of an incentive program, such as offering bonuses and bounties, is associated with higher rating by experts, but a lower level of social media following. Following the 2018 cryptocurrency slump, teams have increased the percentage of tokens kept in lock-up to prevent large market supplies that result in a slump as before and to signal their long-term commitment to the project. ICOs’ ratings and prices show contradictory characteristics, where blockchain infrastructure, healthcare, and marketplace domain tokens attracted lowest prices while being rated the highest, whereas the converse was true for energy tokens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRAINS49436.2020.9223270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

首次代币发行(ico)是基于区块链的众筹企业,旨在促进获得资本。区块链技术有望解决当今的许多问题,然而,在过去三年中,加密货币活动的减少和欺诈行为引发了一些担忧。我们使用一个新颖的手工收集的数据集,研究了美国ICO代币的一系列特征,从2015年推出的第一个代币到2019年12月。ICO代币的价格在2017年达到最高点,随后在2018年急剧下跌,此后缓慢复苏。了解您的客户(KYC)和白名单尽职调查程序的存在可以使ICO获得专家的更高评级和更高水平的社交媒体关注者。另一方面,ICO利用奖励计划,如提供奖金和赏金,与专家的较高评级相关,但社交媒体的关注水平较低。在2018年加密货币暴跌之后,团队增加了锁定代币的比例,以防止像以前一样导致暴跌的大量市场供应,并表明他们对该项目的长期承诺。ico的评级和价格显示出矛盾的特征,区块链基础设施、医疗保健和市场领域代币吸引的价格最低,而评级最高,而能源代币则相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Descriptive Analysis of US Initial Coin Offerings
Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) are blockchain-based crowdfunding ventures to facilitate access to capital. Blockchain technology promises to solve many present-day problems, however, in the past three years, a diminished crypto-currency activity and fraudulent undertakings have raised some concerns. Using a novel, hand-collected dataset, we study a range of characteristics of US-based ICO tokens, starting with the first token launched in 2015 till December 2019. The price of ICO tokens was at its highest in 2017, followed by a sharp decline in 2018 and a slow recovery since. Presence of Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and White-list due diligence procedures can be associated with an ICO receiving a higher rating from experts and a higher level of social media followers. On the other hand, an ICO’s utilization of an incentive program, such as offering bonuses and bounties, is associated with higher rating by experts, but a lower level of social media following. Following the 2018 cryptocurrency slump, teams have increased the percentage of tokens kept in lock-up to prevent large market supplies that result in a slump as before and to signal their long-term commitment to the project. ICOs’ ratings and prices show contradictory characteristics, where blockchain infrastructure, healthcare, and marketplace domain tokens attracted lowest prices while being rated the highest, whereas the converse was true for energy tokens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信