为瓜拉尼含水层的冲突辩护

A. Nobre, Beatriz Martins Camões
{"title":"为瓜拉尼含水层的冲突辩护","authors":"A. Nobre, Beatriz Martins Camões","doi":"10.20396/rfe.v14i2.8667614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the justification of water-related conflicts by analyzing a hypothetical war for Guarani Aquifer resources. In disagreement, a theoretical framework would be needed to justify war. First, Walzer’s version of Just War Theory (JWT) is presented as the most consolidated reference. Then, Waddington’s criticism of JWT is discussed when it comes to hydric resources, delineating the particularities of a natural resource and establishing that the “moral weight of water scarcity” should be considered. Following this, the hypothetical conflict among countries is introduced. Finally, pragmatism is advocated for justification of conflicts involving water. ","PeriodicalId":114318,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia e Educação","volume":"11 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justifying a conflict over the Guarani Aquifer\",\"authors\":\"A. Nobre, Beatriz Martins Camões\",\"doi\":\"10.20396/rfe.v14i2.8667614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the justification of water-related conflicts by analyzing a hypothetical war for Guarani Aquifer resources. In disagreement, a theoretical framework would be needed to justify war. First, Walzer’s version of Just War Theory (JWT) is presented as the most consolidated reference. Then, Waddington’s criticism of JWT is discussed when it comes to hydric resources, delineating the particularities of a natural resource and establishing that the “moral weight of water scarcity” should be considered. Following this, the hypothetical conflict among countries is introduced. Finally, pragmatism is advocated for justification of conflicts involving water. \",\"PeriodicalId\":114318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofia e Educação\",\"volume\":\"11 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofia e Educação\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20396/rfe.v14i2.8667614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia e Educação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rfe.v14i2.8667614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过分析一场针对瓜拉尼含水层资源的假想战争,来讨论与水有关的冲突的正当性。在分歧中,需要一个理论框架来证明战争的正当性。首先,沃尔泽的《正义战争理论》(JWT)版本被认为是最完整的参考。然后,讨论了Waddington对JWT的批评,当涉及到水力资源时,描绘了自然资源的特殊性,并确立了应该考虑“水资源短缺的道德重量”。接着,介绍了国家间的假设冲突。最后,提倡实用主义为涉及水资源的冲突辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justifying a conflict over the Guarani Aquifer
This article deals with the justification of water-related conflicts by analyzing a hypothetical war for Guarani Aquifer resources. In disagreement, a theoretical framework would be needed to justify war. First, Walzer’s version of Just War Theory (JWT) is presented as the most consolidated reference. Then, Waddington’s criticism of JWT is discussed when it comes to hydric resources, delineating the particularities of a natural resource and establishing that the “moral weight of water scarcity” should be considered. Following this, the hypothetical conflict among countries is introduced. Finally, pragmatism is advocated for justification of conflicts involving water. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信