慢性腰痛患者物理治疗的结果

Zalica Klemenc Ketiš
{"title":"慢性腰痛患者物理治疗的结果","authors":"Zalica Klemenc Ketiš","doi":"10.18690/actabiomed.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the outcomes of a10–treatment sessions program of physical therapy regarding the level of pain and health–related quality of life in patients with chronic, non–specific, low back pain.Methods: A consecutive sample of adults (N = 129) with chronic, non–specific, low back pain was assessed for improvement after a 10–day physical therapy program, consisting of an average of 3 different physical modalities, as prescribed by family physicians. A visual analog pain scale and EuroQol questionnaire (EQ–5D and EQ–VAS) were completed by patients before and after physical therapy.Results: The intensity of pain after 10 days of physical therapy was on average lower (1.7 ± 1.8 points; P < 0.001). The assessment of overall health on the EQ–VAS was on average better (10.3 ± 15.2 points; P < 0.001). The score of the EQ–5D was on average lower (0.8 ± 1.2 points; P < 0.001). The patients that were not on sick leave during the physical therapy reported a greater lowering of the intensity of pain than those on sick leave (P = 0.03). Patients with a BMI > 29 kg/m2 had a significantly higher change in the assessment of overall health on the EQ–VAS (P = 0.022). The patients that had group exercise in the set of procedures reported a greater improvement in overall health on the EQ–VAS compared to the patients that didnot have group exercise (P = 0.036). The patients with anxiety and depression had a significantly higher change in the composite score of the EQ–5D (P = 0.013). Patients with a BMI > 29 kg/m2 had a significantly higher change in the composite score of the EQ–5D (P = 0.013).Conclusion: Physical therapy has some effect in the short–term treatment of patients with chronic, non–specific, low back pain, but the viability of such procedures in this population of patients is questionable.","PeriodicalId":186880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of physical therapy in patients with chronic low back pain\",\"authors\":\"Zalica Klemenc Ketiš\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/actabiomed.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the outcomes of a10–treatment sessions program of physical therapy regarding the level of pain and health–related quality of life in patients with chronic, non–specific, low back pain.Methods: A consecutive sample of adults (N = 129) with chronic, non–specific, low back pain was assessed for improvement after a 10–day physical therapy program, consisting of an average of 3 different physical modalities, as prescribed by family physicians. A visual analog pain scale and EuroQol questionnaire (EQ–5D and EQ–VAS) were completed by patients before and after physical therapy.Results: The intensity of pain after 10 days of physical therapy was on average lower (1.7 ± 1.8 points; P < 0.001). The assessment of overall health on the EQ–VAS was on average better (10.3 ± 15.2 points; P < 0.001). The score of the EQ–5D was on average lower (0.8 ± 1.2 points; P < 0.001). The patients that were not on sick leave during the physical therapy reported a greater lowering of the intensity of pain than those on sick leave (P = 0.03). Patients with a BMI > 29 kg/m2 had a significantly higher change in the assessment of overall health on the EQ–VAS (P = 0.022). The patients that had group exercise in the set of procedures reported a greater improvement in overall health on the EQ–VAS compared to the patients that didnot have group exercise (P = 0.036). The patients with anxiety and depression had a significantly higher change in the composite score of the EQ–5D (P = 0.013). Patients with a BMI > 29 kg/m2 had a significantly higher change in the composite score of the EQ–5D (P = 0.013).Conclusion: Physical therapy has some effect in the short–term treatment of patients with chronic, non–specific, low back pain, but the viability of such procedures in this population of patients is questionable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medico-Biotechnica\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medico-Biotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估慢性、非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛水平和健康相关生活质量的10个疗程物理治疗方案的结果。方法:对患有慢性、非特异性腰痛的成人(N = 129)进行连续抽样,评估他们在接受由家庭医生规定的平均3种不同的物理治疗方案后10天的改善情况。患者在物理治疗前后分别完成视觉模拟疼痛量表和EuroQol问卷(EQ-5D和EQ-VAS)。结果:物理治疗10 d后疼痛强度平均降低(1.7±1.8分);P < 0.001)。EQ-VAS总体健康评分平均较好(10.3±15.2分;P < 0.001)。EQ-5D得分平均较低(0.8±1.2分);P < 0.001)。物理治疗期间未请病假的患者疼痛强度比请病假的患者明显降低(P = 0.03)。BMI > 29 kg/m2的患者在EQ-VAS上的整体健康评估变化显著更高(P = 0.022)。在一组程序中进行小组锻炼的患者与没有进行小组锻炼的患者相比,在EQ-VAS上报告了更大的整体健康改善(P = 0.036)。焦虑、抑郁患者的EQ-5D综合评分变化显著高于焦虑、抑郁患者(P = 0.013)。BMI > 29 kg/m2的患者EQ-5D综合评分变化显著高于BMI > 29 kg/m2的患者(P = 0.013)。结论:物理疗法在慢性非特异性腰痛患者的短期治疗中有一定效果,但这种治疗方法在这类患者中的可行性值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of physical therapy in patients with chronic low back pain
Purpose: To assess the outcomes of a10–treatment sessions program of physical therapy regarding the level of pain and health–related quality of life in patients with chronic, non–specific, low back pain.Methods: A consecutive sample of adults (N = 129) with chronic, non–specific, low back pain was assessed for improvement after a 10–day physical therapy program, consisting of an average of 3 different physical modalities, as prescribed by family physicians. A visual analog pain scale and EuroQol questionnaire (EQ–5D and EQ–VAS) were completed by patients before and after physical therapy.Results: The intensity of pain after 10 days of physical therapy was on average lower (1.7 ± 1.8 points; P < 0.001). The assessment of overall health on the EQ–VAS was on average better (10.3 ± 15.2 points; P < 0.001). The score of the EQ–5D was on average lower (0.8 ± 1.2 points; P < 0.001). The patients that were not on sick leave during the physical therapy reported a greater lowering of the intensity of pain than those on sick leave (P = 0.03). Patients with a BMI > 29 kg/m2 had a significantly higher change in the assessment of overall health on the EQ–VAS (P = 0.022). The patients that had group exercise in the set of procedures reported a greater improvement in overall health on the EQ–VAS compared to the patients that didnot have group exercise (P = 0.036). The patients with anxiety and depression had a significantly higher change in the composite score of the EQ–5D (P = 0.013). Patients with a BMI > 29 kg/m2 had a significantly higher change in the composite score of the EQ–5D (P = 0.013).Conclusion: Physical therapy has some effect in the short–term treatment of patients with chronic, non–specific, low back pain, but the viability of such procedures in this population of patients is questionable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信