用博弈论模型表示发电容量扩张

E. Centeno, J. Reneses, S. Wogrin, J. Barquín
{"title":"用博弈论模型表示发电容量扩张","authors":"E. Centeno, J. Reneses, S. Wogrin, J. Barquín","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2011.5953027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electricity generation capacity expansion is still a complex and elusive problem. Nevertheless, the importance for generation companies and regulators of analyzing the decision of building new power plants, due to its economic impact, has led to a large number of studies that address this problem using different techniques. One of the most promising alternatives is the use of game theory. This paper presents two game theory models that can be used in this context and compares them. The first model is an extension of a conjectured-price-response market equilibrium model that includes expansion decisions. In this case, each agent optimizes in a single-shot game the overall profit including investment and operation. The second model considers expansion and operation decisions separately to increase model realism. In this model expansion level considers overall profit, but market is considered as a constraint for the upper level game, in a bilevel game schema. Some bilevel games can be reduced to a one-stage conjectured-price-response game. Thus, the objective of the paper is to assess if the one shot game, that is much easier to solve can be considered as a good approximation for the bilevel game formulation, without explicitly solving the bilevel game.","PeriodicalId":143375,"journal":{"name":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation of electricity generation capacity expansion by means of game theory models\",\"authors\":\"E. Centeno, J. Reneses, S. Wogrin, J. Barquín\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2011.5953027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electricity generation capacity expansion is still a complex and elusive problem. Nevertheless, the importance for generation companies and regulators of analyzing the decision of building new power plants, due to its economic impact, has led to a large number of studies that address this problem using different techniques. One of the most promising alternatives is the use of game theory. This paper presents two game theory models that can be used in this context and compares them. The first model is an extension of a conjectured-price-response market equilibrium model that includes expansion decisions. In this case, each agent optimizes in a single-shot game the overall profit including investment and operation. The second model considers expansion and operation decisions separately to increase model realism. In this model expansion level considers overall profit, but market is considered as a constraint for the upper level game, in a bilevel game schema. Some bilevel games can be reduced to a one-stage conjectured-price-response game. Thus, the objective of the paper is to assess if the one shot game, that is much easier to solve can be considered as a good approximation for the bilevel game formulation, without explicitly solving the bilevel game.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2011.5953027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2011.5953027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

发电能力扩张仍然是一个复杂而难以捉摸的问题。然而,由于其经济影响,对发电公司和监管机构分析建设新电厂的决策的重要性,导致了大量研究使用不同的技术来解决这个问题。最有希望的替代方法之一是使用博弈论。本文提出了两种适用于这种情况的博弈论模型,并对它们进行了比较。第一个模型是包含扩张决策的价格-反应市场均衡模型的扩展。在这种情况下,每个agent在单次博弈中对包括投资和运营在内的总利润进行优化。第二种模型分别考虑扩张和运营决策,以增加模型的真实感。在该模型中,扩展层考虑的是整体利润,但在双层博弈模式中,市场被认为是上层博弈的约束条件。一些双层博弈可以简化为一个单阶段的推测价格-反应博弈。因此,本文的目的是评估在不明确求解双层博弈的情况下,更容易求解的单次博弈是否可以被视为双层博弈公式的良好近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representation of electricity generation capacity expansion by means of game theory models
Electricity generation capacity expansion is still a complex and elusive problem. Nevertheless, the importance for generation companies and regulators of analyzing the decision of building new power plants, due to its economic impact, has led to a large number of studies that address this problem using different techniques. One of the most promising alternatives is the use of game theory. This paper presents two game theory models that can be used in this context and compares them. The first model is an extension of a conjectured-price-response market equilibrium model that includes expansion decisions. In this case, each agent optimizes in a single-shot game the overall profit including investment and operation. The second model considers expansion and operation decisions separately to increase model realism. In this model expansion level considers overall profit, but market is considered as a constraint for the upper level game, in a bilevel game schema. Some bilevel games can be reduced to a one-stage conjectured-price-response game. Thus, the objective of the paper is to assess if the one shot game, that is much easier to solve can be considered as a good approximation for the bilevel game formulation, without explicitly solving the bilevel game.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信