设计验证通过仿真和自动测试模式生成

H. Al-Asaad, J. Hayes
{"title":"设计验证通过仿真和自动测试模式生成","authors":"H. Al-Asaad, J. Hayes","doi":"10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a simulation-based method for combinational design verification that aims at complete coverage of specified design errors using conventional ATPG tools. The error models used in prior research are examined and reduced to four types: gate substitution errors (GSEs), gate count errors (GCEs), input count errors (ICEs), and wrong input errors (WIEs). Conditions are derived for a gate to be completely testable for GSEs. These conditions lend to small rest sets for GSEs. Near-minimal test sets are also derived for GCEs. We analyze redundancy in design errors and relate this to single stuck-line (SSL) redundancy. We show how to map all the foregoing error types into SSL faults, and describe an extensive set of experiments to evaluate the proposed method. Our experiments demonstrate that high coverage of the modeled design errors can be achieved with small test sets.","PeriodicalId":367501,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design verification via simulation and automatic test pattern generation\",\"authors\":\"H. Al-Asaad, J. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a simulation-based method for combinational design verification that aims at complete coverage of specified design errors using conventional ATPG tools. The error models used in prior research are examined and reduced to four types: gate substitution errors (GSEs), gate count errors (GCEs), input count errors (ICEs), and wrong input errors (WIEs). Conditions are derived for a gate to be completely testable for GSEs. These conditions lend to small rest sets for GSEs. Near-minimal test sets are also derived for GCEs. We analyze redundancy in design errors and relate this to single stuck-line (SSL) redundancy. We show how to map all the foregoing error types into SSL faults, and describe an extensive set of experiments to evaluate the proposed method. Our experiments demonstrate that high coverage of the modeled design errors can be achieved with small test sets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

我们提出了一种基于仿真的组合设计验证方法,旨在使用传统的ATPG工具完全覆盖指定的设计错误。对先前研究中使用的误差模型进行了检验,并将其简化为四种类型:门替代错误(GSEs)、门计数错误(GCEs)、输入计数错误(ICEs)和错误输入错误(WIEs)。导出了栅极完全可用于gse测试的条件。这些条件为gse提供了较小的休整集。近似最小测试集也为gce导出。我们分析了设计错误中的冗余,并将其与单卡线(SSL)冗余联系起来。我们展示了如何将上述所有错误类型映射到SSL错误,并描述了一组广泛的实验来评估所提出的方法。我们的实验表明,小的测试集可以实现高覆盖率的建模设计误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design verification via simulation and automatic test pattern generation
We present a simulation-based method for combinational design verification that aims at complete coverage of specified design errors using conventional ATPG tools. The error models used in prior research are examined and reduced to four types: gate substitution errors (GSEs), gate count errors (GCEs), input count errors (ICEs), and wrong input errors (WIEs). Conditions are derived for a gate to be completely testable for GSEs. These conditions lend to small rest sets for GSEs. Near-minimal test sets are also derived for GCEs. We analyze redundancy in design errors and relate this to single stuck-line (SSL) redundancy. We show how to map all the foregoing error types into SSL faults, and describe an extensive set of experiments to evaluate the proposed method. Our experiments demonstrate that high coverage of the modeled design errors can be achieved with small test sets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信