精神卫生保健质量措施:国家清单结果。

R. Hermann, H. S. Leff, R. Palmer, D. Yang, T. Teller, S. Provost, C. Jakubiak, J. Chan
{"title":"精神卫生保健质量措施:国家清单结果。","authors":"R. Hermann, H. S. Leff, R. Palmer, D. Yang, T. Teller, S. Provost, C. Jakubiak, J. Chan","doi":"10.1177/107755800773743763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Inventory of Mental Health Quality Measures was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to (1) inventory process measures for assessing the quality of mental health care; (2) identify clinical, administrative, and quality domains where measures have been developed; and (3) identify areas where further research and development is needed. Among the 86 measures identified, most evaluated treatment of major mental disorders, for example, schizophrenia (24 percent) and major depression (21 percent). A small proportion focused on children (8 percent) or the elderly (9 percent). Domains of quality included treatment appropriateness (65 percent), continuity (26 percent), access (26 percent), coordination (13 percent), detection (12 percent), and prevention (6 percent). Few measures were evaluated for reliability (12 percent) or validity (3 percent). Measures imposing a lower burden were more likely to be in use (chi 2 = 4.41, p = .036). Further measures are needed to assess care for several priority clinical and demographic groups. Research should focus on measure validity, reliability, and implementation costs. In order to foster quality improvement activities and use of common measures and specifications for mental health care, the inventory of quality measures will be made available at www.challiance.org/cqaimh.","PeriodicalId":169610,"journal":{"name":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality measures for mental health care: results from a national inventory.\",\"authors\":\"R. Hermann, H. S. Leff, R. Palmer, D. Yang, T. Teller, S. Provost, C. Jakubiak, J. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/107755800773743763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The National Inventory of Mental Health Quality Measures was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to (1) inventory process measures for assessing the quality of mental health care; (2) identify clinical, administrative, and quality domains where measures have been developed; and (3) identify areas where further research and development is needed. Among the 86 measures identified, most evaluated treatment of major mental disorders, for example, schizophrenia (24 percent) and major depression (21 percent). A small proportion focused on children (8 percent) or the elderly (9 percent). Domains of quality included treatment appropriateness (65 percent), continuity (26 percent), access (26 percent), coordination (13 percent), detection (12 percent), and prevention (6 percent). Few measures were evaluated for reliability (12 percent) or validity (3 percent). Measures imposing a lower burden were more likely to be in use (chi 2 = 4.41, p = .036). Further measures are needed to assess care for several priority clinical and demographic groups. Research should focus on measure validity, reliability, and implementation costs. In order to foster quality improvement activities and use of common measures and specifications for mental health care, the inventory of quality measures will be made available at www.challiance.org/cqaimh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical care research and review : MCRR\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical care research and review : MCRR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/107755800773743763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical care research and review : MCRR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/107755800773743763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

全国精神卫生质量措施清单由卫生保健研究和质量局资助,目的是:(1)评估精神卫生保健质量的清单处理措施;(2)确定已制定措施的临床、行政和质量领域;(3)确定需要进一步研究和开发的领域。在确定的86项措施中,大多数评估主要精神障碍的治疗,例如精神分裂症(24%)和重度抑郁症(21%)。一小部分关注儿童(8%)或老年人(9%)。质量领域包括治疗适当性(65%)、连续性(26%)、可及性(26%)、协调性(13%)、检测(12%)和预防(6%)。很少有措施被评估为信度(12%)或效度(3%)。施加较低负担的措施更有可能被使用(chi 2 = 4.41, p = 0.036)。需要采取进一步措施来评估对几个重点临床和人口群体的护理。研究应侧重于测量的效度、信度和实施成本。为了促进提高质量的活动和使用精神保健的共同措施和规范,将在www.challiance.org/cqaimh上提供质量措施清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality measures for mental health care: results from a national inventory.
The National Inventory of Mental Health Quality Measures was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to (1) inventory process measures for assessing the quality of mental health care; (2) identify clinical, administrative, and quality domains where measures have been developed; and (3) identify areas where further research and development is needed. Among the 86 measures identified, most evaluated treatment of major mental disorders, for example, schizophrenia (24 percent) and major depression (21 percent). A small proportion focused on children (8 percent) or the elderly (9 percent). Domains of quality included treatment appropriateness (65 percent), continuity (26 percent), access (26 percent), coordination (13 percent), detection (12 percent), and prevention (6 percent). Few measures were evaluated for reliability (12 percent) or validity (3 percent). Measures imposing a lower burden were more likely to be in use (chi 2 = 4.41, p = .036). Further measures are needed to assess care for several priority clinical and demographic groups. Research should focus on measure validity, reliability, and implementation costs. In order to foster quality improvement activities and use of common measures and specifications for mental health care, the inventory of quality measures will be made available at www.challiance.org/cqaimh.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信