基于电压平衡角度的简化最近邻控制(NLC)模块化多电平变换器

Mohan P. Thakre, Tushar K. Jadhav, S. Patil, Vaishnavi R. Butale
{"title":"基于电压平衡角度的简化最近邻控制(NLC)模块化多电平变换器","authors":"Mohan P. Thakre, Tushar K. Jadhav, S. Patil, Vaishnavi R. Butale","doi":"10.1109/IEMRE52042.2021.9386740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modularity, low losses, scalability as well as low filtering requirements make the Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) a best solution besides HVDC implementations. But still the key concern associated with the implementation has been the voltage balancing of capacitors of about their sub - modules (SMs). Even though the MMC does have an attractive configuration with such a variety of notable features, a sophisticated control method is designed for desirable process. Pulse-width modulation (PWM) control strategy of various combinations, such as phase and level-shifted carriers, has been the most popular MMC deployment. However, the difficult positioning of a significant number of SMs as well as a high switching frequency seems to be constraints of PWM techniques. Even so, Nearest Level Control (NLC) provides a lower switching frequency and easier implementation. Due to its flexibility as well as easy implementation, NLC has become the most famous having to balance methodology for MMC SMs. The research article provides an insight that the use of NLC for 5 levels of MMC, where neither individual sub-module status has been required at the gate pulse generation stage. SM Identification is done upon sorting of sub-modules and the logic of a gate voltage level switching could be assessed. Throughout this article the MATLAB simulation has been conducted out on 5 levels of MMC with simplified NLC and the control strategy of PWM. Just on basis of the results obtained, a comparative evaluation between two techniques was carried out.","PeriodicalId":202287,"journal":{"name":"2021 Innovations in Energy Management and Renewable Resources(52042)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modular Multilevel Converter with Simplified Nearest Level Control (NLC) Strategy for Voltage Balancing Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Mohan P. Thakre, Tushar K. Jadhav, S. Patil, Vaishnavi R. Butale\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMRE52042.2021.9386740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modularity, low losses, scalability as well as low filtering requirements make the Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) a best solution besides HVDC implementations. But still the key concern associated with the implementation has been the voltage balancing of capacitors of about their sub - modules (SMs). Even though the MMC does have an attractive configuration with such a variety of notable features, a sophisticated control method is designed for desirable process. Pulse-width modulation (PWM) control strategy of various combinations, such as phase and level-shifted carriers, has been the most popular MMC deployment. However, the difficult positioning of a significant number of SMs as well as a high switching frequency seems to be constraints of PWM techniques. Even so, Nearest Level Control (NLC) provides a lower switching frequency and easier implementation. Due to its flexibility as well as easy implementation, NLC has become the most famous having to balance methodology for MMC SMs. The research article provides an insight that the use of NLC for 5 levels of MMC, where neither individual sub-module status has been required at the gate pulse generation stage. SM Identification is done upon sorting of sub-modules and the logic of a gate voltage level switching could be assessed. Throughout this article the MATLAB simulation has been conducted out on 5 levels of MMC with simplified NLC and the control strategy of PWM. Just on basis of the results obtained, a comparative evaluation between two techniques was carried out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Innovations in Energy Management and Renewable Resources(52042)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Innovations in Energy Management and Renewable Resources(52042)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMRE52042.2021.9386740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Innovations in Energy Management and Renewable Resources(52042)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMRE52042.2021.9386740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

模块化,低损耗,可扩展性以及低滤波要求使模块化多电平转换器(MMC)成为HVDC实现之外的最佳解决方案。但是,与实现相关的关键问题仍然是其子模块(SMs)电容器的电压平衡。即使MMC确实有一个有吸引力的配置与各种显着的特点,一个复杂的控制方法是为理想的过程而设计的。各种组合的脉宽调制(PWM)控制策略,如相位和电平移载波,一直是最流行的MMC部署。然而,大量SMs的难以定位以及高开关频率似乎是PWM技术的限制。即便如此,最近电平控制(NLC)提供了更低的开关频率和更容易实现。由于其灵活性和易于实现,NLC已成为最有名的MMC短信的平衡方法。该研究文章提供了一种见解,即NLC用于5级MMC,其中在门极脉冲产生阶段不需要单独的子模块状态。SM识别是在对子模块进行排序后完成的,并且可以评估门电压电平开关的逻辑。本文采用简化的NLC和PWM控制策略对5级MMC进行了MATLAB仿真。在此基础上,对两种技术进行了比较评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modular Multilevel Converter with Simplified Nearest Level Control (NLC) Strategy for Voltage Balancing Perspective
Modularity, low losses, scalability as well as low filtering requirements make the Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) a best solution besides HVDC implementations. But still the key concern associated with the implementation has been the voltage balancing of capacitors of about their sub - modules (SMs). Even though the MMC does have an attractive configuration with such a variety of notable features, a sophisticated control method is designed for desirable process. Pulse-width modulation (PWM) control strategy of various combinations, such as phase and level-shifted carriers, has been the most popular MMC deployment. However, the difficult positioning of a significant number of SMs as well as a high switching frequency seems to be constraints of PWM techniques. Even so, Nearest Level Control (NLC) provides a lower switching frequency and easier implementation. Due to its flexibility as well as easy implementation, NLC has become the most famous having to balance methodology for MMC SMs. The research article provides an insight that the use of NLC for 5 levels of MMC, where neither individual sub-module status has been required at the gate pulse generation stage. SM Identification is done upon sorting of sub-modules and the logic of a gate voltage level switching could be assessed. Throughout this article the MATLAB simulation has been conducted out on 5 levels of MMC with simplified NLC and the control strategy of PWM. Just on basis of the results obtained, a comparative evaluation between two techniques was carried out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信