邪恶的平庸

J. Geddes
{"title":"邪恶的平庸","authors":"J. Geddes","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199915453.003.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In her description of Eichmann as an exemplar of the banality of evil, Hannah Arendt was describing a new kind of perpetrator—not new in the sense of being the first of his kind but new to our usual taxonomy of evildoers. Arendt writes, “Eichmann was not Iago and not Macbeth.” Into our catalogue of violent sociopaths, sadistic murderers, evil geniuses, and subhuman fiends, we now had to insert something that was less extreme, less recognizable as evil, and thus, perhaps, more disturbing: the bureaucrat who murders without any recognizable evil intentions or feelings of hatred.","PeriodicalId":318625,"journal":{"name":"Evil","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Banality of Evil\",\"authors\":\"J. Geddes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780199915453.003.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In her description of Eichmann as an exemplar of the banality of evil, Hannah Arendt was describing a new kind of perpetrator—not new in the sense of being the first of his kind but new to our usual taxonomy of evildoers. Arendt writes, “Eichmann was not Iago and not Macbeth.” Into our catalogue of violent sociopaths, sadistic murderers, evil geniuses, and subhuman fiends, we now had to insert something that was less extreme, less recognizable as evil, and thus, perhaps, more disturbing: the bureaucrat who murders without any recognizable evil intentions or feelings of hatred.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evil\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199915453.003.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199915453.003.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汉娜·阿伦特将艾希曼描述为平庸之恶的典范,她描述的是一种新的犯罪者——不是第一个这样的犯罪者,而是我们通常对犯罪者的分类。阿伦特写道:“艾希曼不是伊阿古,也不是麦克白。”在我们的暴力反社会者、虐待狂杀人犯、邪恶天才和次人类恶魔的目录中,我们现在必须加入一些不那么极端、不那么邪恶的东西,因此,也许更令人不安:那些杀人却没有任何可识别的邪恶意图或仇恨的官僚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Banality of Evil
In her description of Eichmann as an exemplar of the banality of evil, Hannah Arendt was describing a new kind of perpetrator—not new in the sense of being the first of his kind but new to our usual taxonomy of evildoers. Arendt writes, “Eichmann was not Iago and not Macbeth.” Into our catalogue of violent sociopaths, sadistic murderers, evil geniuses, and subhuman fiends, we now had to insert something that was less extreme, less recognizable as evil, and thus, perhaps, more disturbing: the bureaucrat who murders without any recognizable evil intentions or feelings of hatred.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信