正当法律程序和早期监护

Antônio Cláudio da Costa Machado
{"title":"正当法律程序和早期监护","authors":"Antônio Cláudio da Costa Machado","doi":"10.36751/rdh.v6i2.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work has as scope the investigation of the anticipatory measures as a way to achieve the due processo f law garantie and the demonstration that the art. 273 of the brasilian Civil Procedure Code means the preponderance of the fundamental right of effectiveness over the fundamental right to security. In a second moment comes the examination of the question concerning the constitucionality of the procedure rules that establish limitations to the concession antecipatory measures and the conclusion that such limitations are authorized by the Constituition","PeriodicalId":429341,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Devido processo legal e tutela antecipada\",\"authors\":\"Antônio Cláudio da Costa Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.36751/rdh.v6i2.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present work has as scope the investigation of the anticipatory measures as a way to achieve the due processo f law garantie and the demonstration that the art. 273 of the brasilian Civil Procedure Code means the preponderance of the fundamental right of effectiveness over the fundamental right to security. In a second moment comes the examination of the question concerning the constitucionality of the procedure rules that establish limitations to the concession antecipatory measures and the conclusion that such limitations are authorized by the Constituition\",\"PeriodicalId\":429341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36751/rdh.v6i2.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direitos Humanos Fundamentais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36751/rdh.v6i2.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本工作的范围还包括对预见性措施的调查,作为实现法律保证的正当程序的一种方式,并证明该法律。《巴西民事诉讼法》第273条规定,基本生效权优先于基本担保权。其次是审查关于规定对预审措施让步的限制的程序规则的合宪性问题,并得出《宪法》授权这种限制的结论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Devido processo legal e tutela antecipada
The present work has as scope the investigation of the anticipatory measures as a way to achieve the due processo f law garantie and the demonstration that the art. 273 of the brasilian Civil Procedure Code means the preponderance of the fundamental right of effectiveness over the fundamental right to security. In a second moment comes the examination of the question concerning the constitucionality of the procedure rules that establish limitations to the concession antecipatory measures and the conclusion that such limitations are authorized by the Constituition
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信