SystemC TLM属性检查中的功能覆盖分析

H. M. Le, Daniel Große, R. Drechsler
{"title":"SystemC TLM属性检查中的功能覆盖分析","authors":"H. M. Le, Daniel Große, R. Drechsler","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2010.5496658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Electronic System Level (ESL) design SystemC has become the standard language due to its excellent support of Transaction Level Modeling (TLM). But even if the complexity of the systems can be handled using the abstraction levels offered by TLM - the most abstract one is untimed and focuses on functionality - still verification is the major bottleneck. In particular, as untimed TLM models are the reference for the following refinement steps their correctness has to be ensured. Thus, formal verification approaches have been developed to prove properties for these models. However, even if several properties have been checked this does not guarantee that the complete functionality of the TLM model has been verified. Thus, in this paper we consider the problem of functional coverage analysis in formal TLM property checking. We present a coverage approach which can analyze whether the property set unambiguously describes all transactions in a SystemC TLM model. The developed coverage analysis method identifies uncovered scenarios and hence allows to close all coverage gaps. As an example we consider an automated teller machine and we show the benefits of the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":200068,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards analyzing functional coverage in SystemC TLM property checking\",\"authors\":\"H. M. Le, Daniel Große, R. Drechsler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLDVT.2010.5496658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For Electronic System Level (ESL) design SystemC has become the standard language due to its excellent support of Transaction Level Modeling (TLM). But even if the complexity of the systems can be handled using the abstraction levels offered by TLM - the most abstract one is untimed and focuses on functionality - still verification is the major bottleneck. In particular, as untimed TLM models are the reference for the following refinement steps their correctness has to be ensured. Thus, formal verification approaches have been developed to prove properties for these models. However, even if several properties have been checked this does not guarantee that the complete functionality of the TLM model has been verified. Thus, in this paper we consider the problem of functional coverage analysis in formal TLM property checking. We present a coverage approach which can analyze whether the property set unambiguously describes all transactions in a SystemC TLM model. The developed coverage analysis method identifies uncovered scenarios and hence allows to close all coverage gaps. As an example we consider an automated teller machine and we show the benefits of the proposed approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2010.5496658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2010.5496658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

对于电子系统级(ESL)设计而言,SystemC由于其对事务级建模(TLM)的出色支持而成为标准语言。但是,即使系统的复杂性可以使用TLM提供的抽象级别来处理——最抽象的抽象级别是不定时的,并且侧重于功能——验证仍然是主要的瓶颈。特别是,由于非定时TLM模型是以下精化步骤的参考,因此必须确保它们的正确性。因此,已经开发了形式化验证方法来证明这些模型的性质。但是,即使检查了几个属性,也不能保证已经验证了TLM模型的全部功能。因此,本文考虑了形式化TLM属性检验中的功能覆盖分析问题。我们提出了一种覆盖方法,它可以分析属性集是否明确地描述了SystemC TLM模型中的所有事务。开发的覆盖分析方法确定了未覆盖的场景,并因此允许关闭所有的覆盖缺口。我们以自动柜员机为例,展示了所提出方法的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards analyzing functional coverage in SystemC TLM property checking
For Electronic System Level (ESL) design SystemC has become the standard language due to its excellent support of Transaction Level Modeling (TLM). But even if the complexity of the systems can be handled using the abstraction levels offered by TLM - the most abstract one is untimed and focuses on functionality - still verification is the major bottleneck. In particular, as untimed TLM models are the reference for the following refinement steps their correctness has to be ensured. Thus, formal verification approaches have been developed to prove properties for these models. However, even if several properties have been checked this does not guarantee that the complete functionality of the TLM model has been verified. Thus, in this paper we consider the problem of functional coverage analysis in formal TLM property checking. We present a coverage approach which can analyze whether the property set unambiguously describes all transactions in a SystemC TLM model. The developed coverage analysis method identifies uncovered scenarios and hence allows to close all coverage gaps. As an example we consider an automated teller machine and we show the benefits of the proposed approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信