残疾镜头:肯尼亚智力残疾的电视框架和全纳教育参与

Jackline Lidubwi, Julius O Bosire, Joan Mutua
{"title":"残疾镜头:肯尼亚智力残疾的电视框架和全纳教育参与","authors":"Jackline Lidubwi, Julius O Bosire, Joan Mutua","doi":"10.47604/ijcpr.1952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study examined how the framing of intellectual disability in television influenced the level of involvement of learners with intellectual disability in inclusive education in Kenya. \nMethodology: The study which was guided by the framing theory utilized the descriptive cross-sectional research design. A sample of 10 teachers in inclusive education schools, 10 Sub-County Education Officers, three television stations, three television producers and five key informants from the Kenya Association of the Intellectually Handicapped was drawn. Data was gathered through questionnaires, interview guides and code sheets. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics while thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. \nFindings: The study found that TV programmes aired disability thematic frames that did not support the mainstreaming of intellectual disability in education. The correlation between intellectual disability thematic frames in television and the involvement of learners in inclusive education was not statistically significant. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that representation of disability in media should be more meaningful and TV producers need orientation for the production of disability friendly content for inclusion in TV. Further, there is a need of expanding journalists’ capacity to report on pertinent issues that are deemed important by Persons with Disabilities, community in-depth news stories and reports with the objective of raising public awareness about issues important to disability communities. Regarding policy, media regulatory bodies like the Communications Authority of Kenya and the Media Council of Kenya can enforce the existing policies related to disability mainstreaming in the media.","PeriodicalId":315921,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication and Public Relation","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability Lense: Television Framing of Intellectual Disability and Inclusive Education Engagement in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Jackline Lidubwi, Julius O Bosire, Joan Mutua\",\"doi\":\"10.47604/ijcpr.1952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The study examined how the framing of intellectual disability in television influenced the level of involvement of learners with intellectual disability in inclusive education in Kenya. \\nMethodology: The study which was guided by the framing theory utilized the descriptive cross-sectional research design. A sample of 10 teachers in inclusive education schools, 10 Sub-County Education Officers, three television stations, three television producers and five key informants from the Kenya Association of the Intellectually Handicapped was drawn. Data was gathered through questionnaires, interview guides and code sheets. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics while thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. \\nFindings: The study found that TV programmes aired disability thematic frames that did not support the mainstreaming of intellectual disability in education. The correlation between intellectual disability thematic frames in television and the involvement of learners in inclusive education was not statistically significant. \\nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that representation of disability in media should be more meaningful and TV producers need orientation for the production of disability friendly content for inclusion in TV. Further, there is a need of expanding journalists’ capacity to report on pertinent issues that are deemed important by Persons with Disabilities, community in-depth news stories and reports with the objective of raising public awareness about issues important to disability communities. Regarding policy, media regulatory bodies like the Communications Authority of Kenya and the Media Council of Kenya can enforce the existing policies related to disability mainstreaming in the media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Communication and Public Relation\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Communication and Public Relation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.1952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication and Public Relation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47604/ijcpr.1952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了电视中智力残疾的框架如何影响肯尼亚智力残疾学习者参与全纳教育的水平。研究方法:本研究以框架理论为指导,采用描述性横断面研究设计。抽取了全纳教育学校的10名教师、10名副县教育官员、3家电视台、3名电视制片人和5名来自肯尼亚智障人士协会的主要举报人作为样本。通过问卷调查、访谈指南和代码表收集数据。定量数据采用描述性和推断性统计进行分析,而定性数据采用专题分析。研究结果:研究发现,电视节目播放的残疾主题框架不支持智力残疾在教育中的主流化。电视节目中的智障主题框架与学习者参与全纳教育之间的相关性无统计学意义。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:本研究建议媒体对残障人士的表现应该更有意义,电视制作人需要为制作残障人士友好的电视内容提供方向。此外,需要扩大记者的能力,报道残疾人认为重要的相关问题、社区深度新闻报道和旨在提高公众对残疾人社区重要问题的认识的报道。在政策方面,肯尼亚通信管理局和肯尼亚媒体委员会等媒体监管机构可以执行与媒体将残疾主流化有关的现有政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disability Lense: Television Framing of Intellectual Disability and Inclusive Education Engagement in Kenya
Purpose: The study examined how the framing of intellectual disability in television influenced the level of involvement of learners with intellectual disability in inclusive education in Kenya. Methodology: The study which was guided by the framing theory utilized the descriptive cross-sectional research design. A sample of 10 teachers in inclusive education schools, 10 Sub-County Education Officers, three television stations, three television producers and five key informants from the Kenya Association of the Intellectually Handicapped was drawn. Data was gathered through questionnaires, interview guides and code sheets. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics while thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. Findings: The study found that TV programmes aired disability thematic frames that did not support the mainstreaming of intellectual disability in education. The correlation between intellectual disability thematic frames in television and the involvement of learners in inclusive education was not statistically significant. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that representation of disability in media should be more meaningful and TV producers need orientation for the production of disability friendly content for inclusion in TV. Further, there is a need of expanding journalists’ capacity to report on pertinent issues that are deemed important by Persons with Disabilities, community in-depth news stories and reports with the objective of raising public awareness about issues important to disability communities. Regarding policy, media regulatory bodies like the Communications Authority of Kenya and the Media Council of Kenya can enforce the existing policies related to disability mainstreaming in the media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信