{"title":"改进UML类图的可测试性","authors":"B. Baudry, Y. Le Traon, G. Sunyé","doi":"10.1109/IWOTA.2004.1428418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper synthesizes our research efforts in the field of object-oriented test. These efforts have two different goals. First, we identify of recurrent design structures - or testability anti-patterns - that worsen software testability. Second, we use the UML extension mechanisms to better specify design information that can make implementation more testable. Although detecting testability anti-patterns during software design is a crucial task, one cannot expect from a non-specialist to make the right improvements, without guidance or automation. To overcome this limitation, each definition of an anti-pattern is associated with an alternative design solution.","PeriodicalId":120954,"journal":{"name":"First International Workshop onTestability Assessment, 2004. IWoTA 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the testability of UML class diagrams\",\"authors\":\"B. Baudry, Y. Le Traon, G. Sunyé\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWOTA.2004.1428418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper synthesizes our research efforts in the field of object-oriented test. These efforts have two different goals. First, we identify of recurrent design structures - or testability anti-patterns - that worsen software testability. Second, we use the UML extension mechanisms to better specify design information that can make implementation more testable. Although detecting testability anti-patterns during software design is a crucial task, one cannot expect from a non-specialist to make the right improvements, without guidance or automation. To overcome this limitation, each definition of an anti-pattern is associated with an alternative design solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Workshop onTestability Assessment, 2004. IWoTA 2004. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Workshop onTestability Assessment, 2004. IWoTA 2004. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWOTA.2004.1428418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Workshop onTestability Assessment, 2004. IWoTA 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWOTA.2004.1428418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper synthesizes our research efforts in the field of object-oriented test. These efforts have two different goals. First, we identify of recurrent design structures - or testability anti-patterns - that worsen software testability. Second, we use the UML extension mechanisms to better specify design information that can make implementation more testable. Although detecting testability anti-patterns during software design is a crucial task, one cannot expect from a non-specialist to make the right improvements, without guidance or automation. To overcome this limitation, each definition of an anti-pattern is associated with an alternative design solution.