寻求非洲社区的神学研究方法

John-Okoria Ibhakewanlan
{"title":"寻求非洲社区的神学研究方法","authors":"John-Okoria Ibhakewanlan","doi":"10.1558/ISIT.19569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This response to Ernst Wolff’s “South African Universities and the Question of Decolonisation” is under five headings. Regarding the field of academic philosophy, this author insists on a unique African theology. On the role of Western legacy, this piece broadens Wolff’s approach in terms of how Western philosophy can commend itself. Thirdly, on the legacy of Africa’s colonial heritage, it denounces colonialism but argues against a simple Afro-centrism. On the issue of “relevance,” the tenability of Wolff’s view is questioned in the search for an African research methodology. The final point about who may legitimately speak is acknowledged as thorny. In conclusion, this response argues that Africa’s history is human history and recalls the need to distinguish between the “roots” and “routes” of African discourse. While the debate rages, this author proposes that the academy adopt an African Community-Based research (ACBR) methodology based on the guiding principle of Knowledge Diffusion.","PeriodicalId":323507,"journal":{"name":"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking an African Community Approach to Theological Research\",\"authors\":\"John-Okoria Ibhakewanlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/ISIT.19569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This response to Ernst Wolff’s “South African Universities and the Question of Decolonisation” is under five headings. Regarding the field of academic philosophy, this author insists on a unique African theology. On the role of Western legacy, this piece broadens Wolff’s approach in terms of how Western philosophy can commend itself. Thirdly, on the legacy of Africa’s colonial heritage, it denounces colonialism but argues against a simple Afro-centrism. On the issue of “relevance,” the tenability of Wolff’s view is questioned in the search for an African research methodology. The final point about who may legitimately speak is acknowledged as thorny. In conclusion, this response argues that Africa’s history is human history and recalls the need to distinguish between the “roots” and “routes” of African discourse. While the debate rages, this author proposes that the academy adopt an African Community-Based research (ACBR) methodology based on the guiding principle of Knowledge Diffusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":323507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/ISIT.19569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/ISIT.19569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对恩斯特•沃尔夫(Ernst Wolff)的《南非大学与非殖民化问题》的回应分为五个标题。在学术哲学领域,作者坚持一种独特的非洲神学。关于西方遗产的作用,这篇文章在西方哲学如何自我评价方面拓宽了沃尔夫的方法。第三,关于非洲殖民遗产,它谴责殖民主义,但反对简单的非洲中心主义。在“相关性”问题上,沃尔夫观点的站得住脚在寻找非洲研究方法的过程中受到了质疑。关于谁可以合法发言的最后一点被认为是棘手的。总之,这一回应认为,非洲的历史是人类的历史,并提醒人们需要区分非洲话语的“根”和“路线”。在争论激烈的同时,作者建议该学院采用基于知识扩散指导原则的非洲社区研究(ACBR)方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seeking an African Community Approach to Theological Research
This response to Ernst Wolff’s “South African Universities and the Question of Decolonisation” is under five headings. Regarding the field of academic philosophy, this author insists on a unique African theology. On the role of Western legacy, this piece broadens Wolff’s approach in terms of how Western philosophy can commend itself. Thirdly, on the legacy of Africa’s colonial heritage, it denounces colonialism but argues against a simple Afro-centrism. On the issue of “relevance,” the tenability of Wolff’s view is questioned in the search for an African research methodology. The final point about who may legitimately speak is acknowledged as thorny. In conclusion, this response argues that Africa’s history is human history and recalls the need to distinguish between the “roots” and “routes” of African discourse. While the debate rages, this author proposes that the academy adopt an African Community-Based research (ACBR) methodology based on the guiding principle of Knowledge Diffusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信