建构主义的特殊教育考察:理论与回顾研究

Seda Özer Şanal, M. Erdem
{"title":"建构主义的特殊教育考察:理论与回顾研究","authors":"Seda Özer Şanal, M. Erdem","doi":"10.31757/euer.611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": While we argue that difference and diversity are essential elements of the education process, we keep one area an utterly separate area: Special education. This area is left as a mysterious closed box with many undiscovered differences. While it is clear that there is behavioral pressure on special education, there are also opinions that claim the opposite. However, it is noteworthy that the views are not reflected in the implementation process. The fact that theory and practice are progressing in different lanes should attract the attention of educators. This study sought evidence for the idea that \"a constructivist approach for special education offers a suitable learning environment.\" This study may be a step to stop defining everything we cannot discover as the other. The problem was discussed by blending it with pro and opposing views. Considering that the study contains a deep synthesis of thoughts, it will also trigger new deep discussions.","PeriodicalId":307289,"journal":{"name":"The European Educational Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of Special Education with Constructivism: A Theoretical and Review Study\",\"authors\":\"Seda Özer Şanal, M. Erdem\",\"doi\":\"10.31757/euer.611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": While we argue that difference and diversity are essential elements of the education process, we keep one area an utterly separate area: Special education. This area is left as a mysterious closed box with many undiscovered differences. While it is clear that there is behavioral pressure on special education, there are also opinions that claim the opposite. However, it is noteworthy that the views are not reflected in the implementation process. The fact that theory and practice are progressing in different lanes should attract the attention of educators. This study sought evidence for the idea that \\\"a constructivist approach for special education offers a suitable learning environment.\\\" This study may be a step to stop defining everything we cannot discover as the other. The problem was discussed by blending it with pro and opposing views. Considering that the study contains a deep synthesis of thoughts, it will also trigger new deep discussions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Educational Researcher\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Educational Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前位置虽然我们认为差异和多样性是教育过程的基本要素,但我们保留了一个完全独立的领域:特殊教育。这个区域就像一个神秘的封闭的盒子,有许多未被发现的差异。虽然很明显,特殊教育存在着行为压力,但也有相反的观点。然而,值得注意的是,这些意见没有反映在执行过程中。理论和实践在不同的轨道上发展的事实应该引起教育者的注意。这项研究为“特殊教育的建构主义方法提供了一个合适的学习环境”这一观点寻找证据。这项研究可能是停止将我们无法发现的事物定义为他者的一步。把赞成和反对的观点混合在一起讨论了这个问题。考虑到这项研究包含了深刻的思想综合,它也将引发新的深刻讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of Special Education with Constructivism: A Theoretical and Review Study
: While we argue that difference and diversity are essential elements of the education process, we keep one area an utterly separate area: Special education. This area is left as a mysterious closed box with many undiscovered differences. While it is clear that there is behavioral pressure on special education, there are also opinions that claim the opposite. However, it is noteworthy that the views are not reflected in the implementation process. The fact that theory and practice are progressing in different lanes should attract the attention of educators. This study sought evidence for the idea that "a constructivist approach for special education offers a suitable learning environment." This study may be a step to stop defining everything we cannot discover as the other. The problem was discussed by blending it with pro and opposing views. Considering that the study contains a deep synthesis of thoughts, it will also trigger new deep discussions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信