LexrideLaw:一个基于争论的法律搜索引擎

Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law Pub Date : 2017-06-12 DOI:10.1145/3086512.3086548

Matthew Gifford

{"title":"LexrideLaw:一个基于争论的法律搜索引擎","authors":"Matthew Gifford","doi":"10.1145/3086512.3086548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal research search engines are overwhelmingly defined by adherence to the appellate case-law organizational model, whereby cases are discovered by relational keyword searches and case files are returned as results. We are proposing a new legal research search engine model where arguments are extracted from appellate cases and are accessible either through selecting nodes in a litigation issue ontology or through relational keyword searches.","PeriodicalId":425187,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LexrideLaw: an argument based legal search engine\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Gifford\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3086512.3086548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal research search engines are overwhelmingly defined by adherence to the appellate case-law organizational model, whereby cases are discovered by relational keyword searches and case files are returned as results. We are proposing a new legal research search engine model where arguments are extracted from appellate cases and are accessible either through selecting nodes in a litigation issue ontology or through relational keyword searches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

法律研究搜索引擎绝大多数是由遵守上诉判例法组织模式来定义的，即通过关系关键字搜索发现案件，并将案件文件作为结果返回。我们提出了一种新的法律研究搜索引擎模型，该模型从上诉案件中提取论点，并且可以通过在诉讼问题本体中选择节点或通过关系关键字搜索来访问。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

LexrideLaw: an argument based legal search engine

Legal research search engines are overwhelmingly defined by adherence to the appellate case-law organizational model, whereby cases are discovered by relational keyword searches and case files are returned as results. We are proposing a new legal research search engine model where arguments are extracted from appellate cases and are accessible either through selecting nodes in a litigation issue ontology or through relational keyword searches.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量