肺气肿中肺的内表面区域

Pathologia Europaea Pub Date : 1976-01-01
P S Hasleton
{"title":"肺气肿中肺的内表面区域","authors":"P S Hasleton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative histological studies on the lung are time consuming and for the pathologist may not reveal much additional imformation in relation to the time spent. Sixty-eight cases of emphysema were studied. The percentages of the lung tissue destroyed by alveolar, bronchiolar and bullous emphysema were determined by macroscopic point counting. The internal surface area (I.S.A.) and internal surface area at a standard lung volume of 3,000 ml(I.S.A.3,000) were determined by the mean linear intercept (M.L.I.) method. There was a significant correlation between both the M.L.I. and I.S.A.3,000 and the percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The M.L.I. was the most accurate guide to the presence of emphysema. The I.S.A. was the least reliable indication of emphysema. Cases of alveolar duct emphysema were both over and underdiagnosed on macroscopic point counting. It is therefore suggested that in cases with alveolar duct emphysema, apparently normal lungs or where full pulmonary function tests are available, quantitative histological studies should be carried out. In other cases it is possible to derive the I.S.A. and I.S.A.3,000 from the percentage of emphysema as determined macroscopically, without recourse to histological methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":76308,"journal":{"name":"Pathologia Europaea","volume":"11 3","pages":"211-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The internal surface area of the lung in emphysema.\",\"authors\":\"P S Hasleton\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative histological studies on the lung are time consuming and for the pathologist may not reveal much additional imformation in relation to the time spent. Sixty-eight cases of emphysema were studied. The percentages of the lung tissue destroyed by alveolar, bronchiolar and bullous emphysema were determined by macroscopic point counting. The internal surface area (I.S.A.) and internal surface area at a standard lung volume of 3,000 ml(I.S.A.3,000) were determined by the mean linear intercept (M.L.I.) method. There was a significant correlation between both the M.L.I. and I.S.A.3,000 and the percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The M.L.I. was the most accurate guide to the presence of emphysema. The I.S.A. was the least reliable indication of emphysema. Cases of alveolar duct emphysema were both over and underdiagnosed on macroscopic point counting. It is therefore suggested that in cases with alveolar duct emphysema, apparently normal lungs or where full pulmonary function tests are available, quantitative histological studies should be carried out. In other cases it is possible to derive the I.S.A. and I.S.A.3,000 from the percentage of emphysema as determined macroscopically, without recourse to histological methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathologia Europaea\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"211-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathologia Europaea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologia Europaea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺的定量组织学研究是耗时的,对于病理学家来说,可能无法揭示与所花费的时间有关的更多信息。本文对68例肺气肿进行了分析。观察肺泡性、细支气管性和大泡性肺气肿对肺组织的破坏百分率。采用平均线性截距法(M.L.I.)测定标准肺容积为3000 ml时的内表面积(i.s.a.3000)和内表面积(i.s.a.3000)。心肌梗死指数和肺组织损伤百分比与肺组织损伤百分比之间存在显著的相关性。脑磁共振成像是诊断肺气肿最准确的方法。内窥镜是肺气肿最不可靠的指征。肺泡管肺气肿肉眼点计数均有过诊和漏诊。因此,建议在肺泡管肺气肿的病例中,肺明显正常或有完整的肺功能检查,应进行定量组织学研究。在其他情况下,可以从宏观确定的肺气肿百分比中得出i.s.a和i.s.a 3000,而无需求助于组织学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The internal surface area of the lung in emphysema.

Quantitative histological studies on the lung are time consuming and for the pathologist may not reveal much additional imformation in relation to the time spent. Sixty-eight cases of emphysema were studied. The percentages of the lung tissue destroyed by alveolar, bronchiolar and bullous emphysema were determined by macroscopic point counting. The internal surface area (I.S.A.) and internal surface area at a standard lung volume of 3,000 ml(I.S.A.3,000) were determined by the mean linear intercept (M.L.I.) method. There was a significant correlation between both the M.L.I. and I.S.A.3,000 and the percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The M.L.I. was the most accurate guide to the presence of emphysema. The I.S.A. was the least reliable indication of emphysema. Cases of alveolar duct emphysema were both over and underdiagnosed on macroscopic point counting. It is therefore suggested that in cases with alveolar duct emphysema, apparently normal lungs or where full pulmonary function tests are available, quantitative histological studies should be carried out. In other cases it is possible to derive the I.S.A. and I.S.A.3,000 from the percentage of emphysema as determined macroscopically, without recourse to histological methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信