{"title":"通过能量成本比较验证躯干力反馈斜坡模拟","authors":"C. Parker, D. Carrier, J. Hollerbach","doi":"10.1109/WHC.2005.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the energy cost of locomotion on a real slope and on a simulated slope using a tether force on the Sarcos Treadport. Walking and running both up and down slopes are investigated. Horizontal tether forces were based on f=Kmgsin(/spl theta/) to simulate the slope /spl theta/. For uphill walking and running, average values of K were determined to be 0.84 and 0.78. For downhill walking and running, average values of K were determined to be 0.72 and 0.66. These values of K reinforce previous findings from psychological and biomechanical studies that found K equal to an average of 0.65.","PeriodicalId":117050,"journal":{"name":"First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of torso force feedback slope simulation through an energy cost comparison\",\"authors\":\"C. Parker, D. Carrier, J. Hollerbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WHC.2005.142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the energy cost of locomotion on a real slope and on a simulated slope using a tether force on the Sarcos Treadport. Walking and running both up and down slopes are investigated. Horizontal tether forces were based on f=Kmgsin(/spl theta/) to simulate the slope /spl theta/. For uphill walking and running, average values of K were determined to be 0.84 and 0.78. For downhill walking and running, average values of K were determined to be 0.72 and 0.66. These values of K reinforce previous findings from psychological and biomechanical studies that found K equal to an average of 0.65.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2005.142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2005.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of torso force feedback slope simulation through an energy cost comparison
This paper compares the energy cost of locomotion on a real slope and on a simulated slope using a tether force on the Sarcos Treadport. Walking and running both up and down slopes are investigated. Horizontal tether forces were based on f=Kmgsin(/spl theta/) to simulate the slope /spl theta/. For uphill walking and running, average values of K were determined to be 0.84 and 0.78. For downhill walking and running, average values of K were determined to be 0.72 and 0.66. These values of K reinforce previous findings from psychological and biomechanical studies that found K equal to an average of 0.65.