以物联网约束网络为目的的物联网网络协议比较

I. Hedi, I. Speh, A. Sarabok
{"title":"以物联网约束网络为目的的物联网网络协议比较","authors":"I. Hedi, I. Speh, A. Sarabok","doi":"10.23919/MIPRO.2017.7973477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparison of Internet of Things protocols used for data transfer in Internet of Things constrained networks is presented. Setting up such a network with a large number of physical interconnected IoT devices can be a challenge. In the IoT world, one of the key challenges is to efficiently support M2M communication in constrained networks. This can be achieved using MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) and CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) protocols. Choosing the appropriate protocol can be difficult while developing IoT application. There are several conditions that need to be considered while determining which protocol should be used. In this paper, we will evaluate performance and compare these protocols through different scenarios.","PeriodicalId":203046,"journal":{"name":"2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IoT network protocols comparison for the purpose of IoT constrained networks\",\"authors\":\"I. Hedi, I. Speh, A. Sarabok\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/MIPRO.2017.7973477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a comparison of Internet of Things protocols used for data transfer in Internet of Things constrained networks is presented. Setting up such a network with a large number of physical interconnected IoT devices can be a challenge. In the IoT world, one of the key challenges is to efficiently support M2M communication in constrained networks. This can be achieved using MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) and CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) protocols. Choosing the appropriate protocol can be difficult while developing IoT application. There are several conditions that need to be considered while determining which protocol should be used. In this paper, we will evaluate performance and compare these protocols through different scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2017.7973477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2017.7973477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

本文对物联网约束网络中用于数据传输的物联网协议进行了比较。建立这样一个具有大量物理互联物联网设备的网络可能是一个挑战。在物联网世界中,关键挑战之一是在受限网络中有效地支持M2M通信。这可以使用MQTT(消息队列遥测传输)和CoAP(约束应用程序协议)协议来实现。在开发物联网应用程序时,选择合适的协议可能很困难。在确定应该使用哪个协议时,需要考虑几个条件。在本文中,我们将通过不同的场景对这些协议进行性能评估和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IoT network protocols comparison for the purpose of IoT constrained networks
In this paper, a comparison of Internet of Things protocols used for data transfer in Internet of Things constrained networks is presented. Setting up such a network with a large number of physical interconnected IoT devices can be a challenge. In the IoT world, one of the key challenges is to efficiently support M2M communication in constrained networks. This can be achieved using MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) and CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) protocols. Choosing the appropriate protocol can be difficult while developing IoT application. There are several conditions that need to be considered while determining which protocol should be used. In this paper, we will evaluate performance and compare these protocols through different scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信