聚醚醚酮笼用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合手术:一项荟萃分析

Sukrit Sharma, S. Goel, Sunil Sharma, H. Chhabra
{"title":"聚醚醚酮笼用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合手术:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Sukrit Sharma, S. Goel, Sunil Sharma, H. Chhabra","doi":"10.4103/2542-4157.259629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: In the current clinical scenario, a wide variety of fusion techniques are being used along with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries. Some of these techniques involve use of autografts, allografts, biomaterials or only PEEK cages. In this study, the existing literatures for anterior cervical discectomy fusion surgeries using PEEK cages and their outcomes have been reviewed to evaluate the results for the best possible alternative. Materials and methods: A PubMed search for all papers stating “PEEK cages used in cervical spinal fusion,” “PEEK materials used in cervical spinal fusion,” and “artificial materials used in cervical fusion surgery with PEEK cages” was done for all studies before January 2018. A total of 197 studies were found, of which 15 were shortlisted as per the inclusion criteria. The existing literatures on PEEK cages used in spinal surgeries were reviewed and analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 25.0 and Student’s t-test was used to compare the results. Results: The total number of patients involved in the existing study was 767 with a mean age of 51.67 ± 9.01 years. 191 patients (24.9%) had cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy; 35 patients (4.5%) had cervical degenerative diseases; 29 patients (3.78%) had cervical spine injury with monosegmental instability; and the rest of the patients suffered from other disorders. The level of surgery for patients was single in 429 patients (55.93%) and multiple in 338 patients (44.06%). PEEK plus bone grafts had a significantly better fusion rate compared with PEEK plus artificial materials (95% confidence interval: 91.075 ± 2.09%; P = 0.0035) for multiple-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Conclusion: PEEK plus bone grafts showed a significant fusion rate compared with PEEK plus artificial materials. PEEK plus bone grafts is a better filler material as compared to PEEK plus artificial materials in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries for multiple levels involved.","PeriodicalId":348394,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials in Orthopedic Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polyetheretherketone cages used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: a meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sukrit Sharma, S. Goel, Sunil Sharma, H. Chhabra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2542-4157.259629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objective: In the current clinical scenario, a wide variety of fusion techniques are being used along with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries. Some of these techniques involve use of autografts, allografts, biomaterials or only PEEK cages. In this study, the existing literatures for anterior cervical discectomy fusion surgeries using PEEK cages and their outcomes have been reviewed to evaluate the results for the best possible alternative. Materials and methods: A PubMed search for all papers stating “PEEK cages used in cervical spinal fusion,” “PEEK materials used in cervical spinal fusion,” and “artificial materials used in cervical fusion surgery with PEEK cages” was done for all studies before January 2018. A total of 197 studies were found, of which 15 were shortlisted as per the inclusion criteria. The existing literatures on PEEK cages used in spinal surgeries were reviewed and analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 25.0 and Student’s t-test was used to compare the results. Results: The total number of patients involved in the existing study was 767 with a mean age of 51.67 ± 9.01 years. 191 patients (24.9%) had cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy; 35 patients (4.5%) had cervical degenerative diseases; 29 patients (3.78%) had cervical spine injury with monosegmental instability; and the rest of the patients suffered from other disorders. The level of surgery for patients was single in 429 patients (55.93%) and multiple in 338 patients (44.06%). PEEK plus bone grafts had a significantly better fusion rate compared with PEEK plus artificial materials (95% confidence interval: 91.075 ± 2.09%; P = 0.0035) for multiple-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Conclusion: PEEK plus bone grafts showed a significant fusion rate compared with PEEK plus artificial materials. PEEK plus bone grafts is a better filler material as compared to PEEK plus artificial materials in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries for multiple levels involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Trials in Orthopedic Disorders\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Trials in Orthopedic Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2542-4157.259629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials in Orthopedic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2542-4157.259629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景和目的:在目前的临床情况下,各种各样的融合技术和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼一起用于前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合手术。其中一些技术包括自体移植物、同种异体移植物、生物材料或仅使用PEEK笼。在本研究中,我们回顾了使用PEEK固定架进行前路颈椎椎间盘切除术融合手术的现有文献及其结果,以评估最佳选择的结果。材料和方法:在PubMed检索2018年1月之前的所有研究的所有论文,包括“用于颈椎融合的PEEK笼”、“用于颈椎融合的PEEK材料”和“用于使用PEEK笼的颈椎融合手术的人工材料”。共发现197项研究,其中15项根据纳入标准入围。对脊柱外科手术中使用的PEEK保持架的现有文献进行了回顾和分析。采用SPSS 25.0软件进行统计分析,采用Student’s t检验比较结果。结果:纳入研究的患者总数为767例,平均年龄51.67±9.01岁。191例(24.9%)存在颈椎神经根病或脊髓病;宫颈退行性疾病35例(4.5%);颈椎损伤伴单节段不稳29例(3.78%);其余的病人则患有其他疾病。手术水平为单一者429例(55.93%),多重者338例(44.06%)。与PEEK +人工材料相比,PEEK +植骨具有更好的融合率(95%置信区间:91.075±2.09%;P = 0.0035),适用于多节段前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合手术。结论:与PEEK +人工材料相比,PEEK +植骨具有显著的融合率。在颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和多节段累及的融合手术中,与PEEK加人工材料相比,PEEK加骨移植物是一种更好的填充材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polyetheretherketone cages used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: a meta-analysis
Background and objective: In the current clinical scenario, a wide variety of fusion techniques are being used along with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries. Some of these techniques involve use of autografts, allografts, biomaterials or only PEEK cages. In this study, the existing literatures for anterior cervical discectomy fusion surgeries using PEEK cages and their outcomes have been reviewed to evaluate the results for the best possible alternative. Materials and methods: A PubMed search for all papers stating “PEEK cages used in cervical spinal fusion,” “PEEK materials used in cervical spinal fusion,” and “artificial materials used in cervical fusion surgery with PEEK cages” was done for all studies before January 2018. A total of 197 studies were found, of which 15 were shortlisted as per the inclusion criteria. The existing literatures on PEEK cages used in spinal surgeries were reviewed and analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 25.0 and Student’s t-test was used to compare the results. Results: The total number of patients involved in the existing study was 767 with a mean age of 51.67 ± 9.01 years. 191 patients (24.9%) had cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy; 35 patients (4.5%) had cervical degenerative diseases; 29 patients (3.78%) had cervical spine injury with monosegmental instability; and the rest of the patients suffered from other disorders. The level of surgery for patients was single in 429 patients (55.93%) and multiple in 338 patients (44.06%). PEEK plus bone grafts had a significantly better fusion rate compared with PEEK plus artificial materials (95% confidence interval: 91.075 ± 2.09%; P = 0.0035) for multiple-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Conclusion: PEEK plus bone grafts showed a significant fusion rate compared with PEEK plus artificial materials. PEEK plus bone grafts is a better filler material as compared to PEEK plus artificial materials in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries for multiple levels involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信