耶稣的末世论与俄罗斯东正教末世论的千禧年和极权主义倾向

S. M. Capilupi
{"title":"耶稣的末世论与俄罗斯东正教末世论的千禧年和极权主义倾向","authors":"S. M. Capilupi","doi":"10.17759/langt.2022090409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every Christian generation must rethink how it understands the mystery of Christ. Jesus, a practicing Jew, meditated on the Scriptures of the past, preferring the enigmatic and rich expression «Son of Man» to refer to Himself, while at the same time trying to understand the actions of the God of Israel in His time. This «Son of Man» Christology had the advantage of not evoking a political emancipatory Davidic Messiah, but instead hinted at a figure who would play a fundamental role at the end of time. Jesus, in his self-consciousness and in his teaching, gradually achieved a unique synthesis of three figures: the Messiah, the suffering Servant, and the Son of Man. The end of time is the time in which, from the point of view of faith, a person lives after the death of the «Son of Man» on the cross and His Resurrection, in accordance with the «no longer and not yet» of His Kingdom, actively awaiting victory over the last enemy — death. In Russian eschatology, both Orthodox and «secular» (in the sense of a specific «religiosity», which also applies to Soviet and post-Soviet ideology), one can often notice a shift in the inevitable tension of the believer’s heart (which, on the contrary, should accept and preserve both sides of Judeo-Christian eschatology) either vertically, towards liturgical or state triumphalism, or horizontally, towards utopia. Often the victim of these different kinds of radicalism is individual freedom.","PeriodicalId":414200,"journal":{"name":"Язык и текст","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eschatological Vision of Jesus and Millenarian and Totalitarian Inclinations of Russian Orthodox Eschatology\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Capilupi\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/langt.2022090409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Every Christian generation must rethink how it understands the mystery of Christ. Jesus, a practicing Jew, meditated on the Scriptures of the past, preferring the enigmatic and rich expression «Son of Man» to refer to Himself, while at the same time trying to understand the actions of the God of Israel in His time. This «Son of Man» Christology had the advantage of not evoking a political emancipatory Davidic Messiah, but instead hinted at a figure who would play a fundamental role at the end of time. Jesus, in his self-consciousness and in his teaching, gradually achieved a unique synthesis of three figures: the Messiah, the suffering Servant, and the Son of Man. The end of time is the time in which, from the point of view of faith, a person lives after the death of the «Son of Man» on the cross and His Resurrection, in accordance with the «no longer and not yet» of His Kingdom, actively awaiting victory over the last enemy — death. In Russian eschatology, both Orthodox and «secular» (in the sense of a specific «religiosity», which also applies to Soviet and post-Soviet ideology), one can often notice a shift in the inevitable tension of the believer’s heart (which, on the contrary, should accept and preserve both sides of Judeo-Christian eschatology) either vertically, towards liturgical or state triumphalism, or horizontally, towards utopia. Often the victim of these different kinds of radicalism is individual freedom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Язык и текст\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Язык и текст\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2022090409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Язык и текст","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2022090409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每一代基督徒都必须重新思考如何理解基督的奥秘。耶稣,一个虔诚的犹太人,沉思着过去的圣经,更喜欢用神秘而丰富的表达“人子”来指代自己,同时试图理解以色列上帝在他的时代的行为。这个“人子”基督论的优势不是唤起政治解放的大卫弥赛亚,而是暗示了一个将在时间结束时发挥基本作用的人物。耶稣,在他的自我意识和他的教导中,逐渐实现了一个独特的三个形象的综合:弥赛亚,受苦的仆人和人子。时间的终结是从信仰的角度来看,一个人在“人子”死在十字架上并复活之后,按照他的王国的“不再和尚未”生活,积极等待战胜最后的敌人-死亡的时间。在俄罗斯的末世论中,无论是东正教还是“世俗”(在特定的“宗教性”的意义上,这也适用于苏联和后苏联的意识形态),人们经常可以注意到信徒内心不可避免的紧张局势的转变(相反,应该接受并保留犹太-基督教末世论的双方),要么纵向地,走向礼拜仪式或国家必胜主义,要么横向地,走向乌托邦。这些不同类型的激进主义的受害者往往是个人自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eschatological Vision of Jesus and Millenarian and Totalitarian Inclinations of Russian Orthodox Eschatology
Every Christian generation must rethink how it understands the mystery of Christ. Jesus, a practicing Jew, meditated on the Scriptures of the past, preferring the enigmatic and rich expression «Son of Man» to refer to Himself, while at the same time trying to understand the actions of the God of Israel in His time. This «Son of Man» Christology had the advantage of not evoking a political emancipatory Davidic Messiah, but instead hinted at a figure who would play a fundamental role at the end of time. Jesus, in his self-consciousness and in his teaching, gradually achieved a unique synthesis of three figures: the Messiah, the suffering Servant, and the Son of Man. The end of time is the time in which, from the point of view of faith, a person lives after the death of the «Son of Man» on the cross and His Resurrection, in accordance with the «no longer and not yet» of His Kingdom, actively awaiting victory over the last enemy — death. In Russian eschatology, both Orthodox and «secular» (in the sense of a specific «religiosity», which also applies to Soviet and post-Soviet ideology), one can often notice a shift in the inevitable tension of the believer’s heart (which, on the contrary, should accept and preserve both sides of Judeo-Christian eschatology) either vertically, towards liturgical or state triumphalism, or horizontally, towards utopia. Often the victim of these different kinds of radicalism is individual freedom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信