成本粘性在稳健性研究中的混淆效应

R. Banker, Sudipta Basu, Dmitri Byzalov, Janice Y. S. Chen
{"title":"成本粘性在稳健性研究中的混淆效应","authors":"R. Banker, Sudipta Basu, Dmitri Byzalov, Janice Y. S. Chen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2482025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sales decreases affect earnings more than sales increases because of cost stickiness. We hypothesize that this correlated omitted variable constitutes a confounding effect in standard asymmetric timeliness models. Adding sales change direction to the Basu (1997) and Ball et al. (2013b) models decreases measured conservatism significantly and has a large impact on the relative ranking of industry-level conservatism estimates and on inferences about drivers of conservatism. Future empirical research on conditional conservatism should control for the potential confounding effect of sticky costs.","PeriodicalId":416245,"journal":{"name":"Research Papers (Concurrent Session Only)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Confounding Effect of Cost Stickiness in Conservatism Research\",\"authors\":\"R. Banker, Sudipta Basu, Dmitri Byzalov, Janice Y. S. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2482025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sales decreases affect earnings more than sales increases because of cost stickiness. We hypothesize that this correlated omitted variable constitutes a confounding effect in standard asymmetric timeliness models. Adding sales change direction to the Basu (1997) and Ball et al. (2013b) models decreases measured conservatism significantly and has a large impact on the relative ranking of industry-level conservatism estimates and on inferences about drivers of conservatism. Future empirical research on conditional conservatism should control for the potential confounding effect of sticky costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Papers (Concurrent Session Only)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Papers (Concurrent Session Only)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2482025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Papers (Concurrent Session Only)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2482025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

由于成本粘性,销售减少对收益的影响大于销售增加。我们假设这个相关的遗漏变量在标准的不对称时效性模型中构成了混淆效应。在Basu(1997)和Ball等人(2013)模型中加入销售变化方向显著降低了测量的保守性,并对行业层面保守性估计的相对排名和对保守性驱动因素的推断产生了很大影响。未来对条件保守性的实证研究应控制粘性成本的潜在混淆效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Confounding Effect of Cost Stickiness in Conservatism Research
Sales decreases affect earnings more than sales increases because of cost stickiness. We hypothesize that this correlated omitted variable constitutes a confounding effect in standard asymmetric timeliness models. Adding sales change direction to the Basu (1997) and Ball et al. (2013b) models decreases measured conservatism significantly and has a large impact on the relative ranking of industry-level conservatism estimates and on inferences about drivers of conservatism. Future empirical research on conditional conservatism should control for the potential confounding effect of sticky costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信