Kristýna Blechová
{"title":"Reciprocita a reprodukce sociálního kapitálu v kontextu kmotrovských vazeb","authors":"Kristýna Blechová","doi":"10.24132/actaff.2022.14.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the role of godparenthood in building social capital in Europe during the 19th century. It seeks to explain how social capital was reproduced in horizontal and vertical ties and what role reciprocity played. However, reciprocity is viewed primarily in the narrow context of social capital theory. Texts on godparenthood usually point to relationships based purely on utilitarian grounds. They typically lack support in social science theory and the terminology used is rarely discussed in detail. Drawing on basic texts from social capital theory or anthropology and history (in the case of godparenthood), the aim of the present text is to outline how social capital can be practically built through godparent relationships. In the introductory section, the basic structure of the reciprocity process is presented. The following passages focus specifically on the application of reciprocity in godparent relationships. The paper first seeks to answer a question that follows quite organically from the previous theoretical introduction. How is it possible that the so-called integrative ties (trust or solidarity) developed based on godparent ties, which were often purposively concluded and characterised by a negotiated and fully institutionalised type of exchange?","PeriodicalId":319543,"journal":{"name":"Acta FF","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta FF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24132/actaff.2022.14.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究主要关注19世纪欧洲教父在社会资本建设中的作用。它试图解释社会资本是如何在水平和垂直关系中再生产的,以及互惠在其中扮演了什么角色。然而,互惠主要是在社会资本理论的狭隘背景下看待的。关于教父身份的文本通常指向纯粹基于功利基础的关系。他们通常缺乏社会科学理论的支持,所使用的术语很少被详细讨论。借鉴社会资本理论或人类学和历史(在教父关系的情况下)的基本文本,本文本的目的是概述如何通过教父关系实际建立社会资本。在引言部分,介绍了互惠过程的基本结构。下面的段落特别关注互惠在教父关系中的应用。这篇论文首先试图回答一个问题,这个问题是由前面的理论介绍有机地引出的。所谓的整合关系(信任或团结)怎么可能在教父关系的基础上发展起来呢?教父关系往往是有目的地缔结的,并以谈判和完全制度化的交换为特征?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reciprocita a reprodukce sociálního kapitálu v kontextu kmotrovských vazeb
This study focuses on the role of godparenthood in building social capital in Europe during the 19th century. It seeks to explain how social capital was reproduced in horizontal and vertical ties and what role reciprocity played. However, reciprocity is viewed primarily in the narrow context of social capital theory. Texts on godparenthood usually point to relationships based purely on utilitarian grounds. They typically lack support in social science theory and the terminology used is rarely discussed in detail. Drawing on basic texts from social capital theory or anthropology and history (in the case of godparenthood), the aim of the present text is to outline how social capital can be practically built through godparent relationships. In the introductory section, the basic structure of the reciprocity process is presented. The following passages focus specifically on the application of reciprocity in godparent relationships. The paper first seeks to answer a question that follows quite organically from the previous theoretical introduction. How is it possible that the so-called integrative ties (trust or solidarity) developed based on godparent ties, which were often purposively concluded and characterised by a negotiated and fully institutionalised type of exchange?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信