Francesca Tomasi, Ilaria Bartolini, Federico Condello, M. Esposti, Valentina Garulli, M. Viale
{"title":"论作者署名领域可疑伪造的分类:以蒙塔莱的《死后日记》为例","authors":"Francesca Tomasi, Ilaria Bartolini, Federico Condello, M. Esposti, Valentina Garulli, M. Viale","doi":"10.1145/2517978.2517989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper wants to explore quantitative and qualitative practices generally exploited in different scientific fields (philology, mathematics, quantitative linguistics, computer science) in order to reveal forgery. Our study will be conducted on Montale's Diario postumo that shows all the typical features of a suspected forgery. The final aim is to merge all these methods in order to define a taxonomy of annotation elements useful, in this particular context of authorship attribution, for developing a data model to be potentially used in all forgery situations.","PeriodicalId":311873,"journal":{"name":"DH-CASE '13","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a taxonomy of suspected forgery in authorship attribution field: a case: Montale's Diario postumo\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Tomasi, Ilaria Bartolini, Federico Condello, M. Esposti, Valentina Garulli, M. Viale\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2517978.2517989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper wants to explore quantitative and qualitative practices generally exploited in different scientific fields (philology, mathematics, quantitative linguistics, computer science) in order to reveal forgery. Our study will be conducted on Montale's Diario postumo that shows all the typical features of a suspected forgery. The final aim is to merge all these methods in order to define a taxonomy of annotation elements useful, in this particular context of authorship attribution, for developing a data model to be potentially used in all forgery situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DH-CASE '13\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DH-CASE '13\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2517978.2517989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DH-CASE '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2517978.2517989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards a taxonomy of suspected forgery in authorship attribution field: a case: Montale's Diario postumo
This paper wants to explore quantitative and qualitative practices generally exploited in different scientific fields (philology, mathematics, quantitative linguistics, computer science) in order to reveal forgery. Our study will be conducted on Montale's Diario postumo that shows all the typical features of a suspected forgery. The final aim is to merge all these methods in order to define a taxonomy of annotation elements useful, in this particular context of authorship attribution, for developing a data model to be potentially used in all forgery situations.