康德的媒介价值公式

E. Wind
{"title":"康德的媒介价值公式","authors":"E. Wind","doi":"10.2307/750025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"t is generally admitted, even by loyal Kantians, that the methods of classification employed by Kant owe much to the scholastic tradition. Defenders of Kant have been anxious to assert that these traces of scholastic terminology affect merely the external form of Kant's presentation and do not penetrate to the centre of his thought. But distinctions between surface and depth are always pernicious in intellectual matters; and it is neither a correct nor a very flattering reflection on Kant to claim that the form and the spirit can be separated in his arguments without detriment to their meaning. Actually, if we were to leave out from Kant's writings those parts which are strikingly medieval in form, we should have to omit even one passage which is generally -and justly-regarded as one of his most characteristically personal expressions. In discussing the three metaphysical questions which, according to his system, are insoluble as problems but indispensable as guides -\"God, Freedom, and Immortality\"-he summarizes them in a formula which appears to be distinctly eighteenth century, Prussian, and Protestant :","PeriodicalId":410128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","volume":"488 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1938-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mediæval Formula in Kant\",\"authors\":\"E. Wind\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/750025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"t is generally admitted, even by loyal Kantians, that the methods of classification employed by Kant owe much to the scholastic tradition. Defenders of Kant have been anxious to assert that these traces of scholastic terminology affect merely the external form of Kant's presentation and do not penetrate to the centre of his thought. But distinctions between surface and depth are always pernicious in intellectual matters; and it is neither a correct nor a very flattering reflection on Kant to claim that the form and the spirit can be separated in his arguments without detriment to their meaning. Actually, if we were to leave out from Kant's writings those parts which are strikingly medieval in form, we should have to omit even one passage which is generally -and justly-regarded as one of his most characteristically personal expressions. In discussing the three metaphysical questions which, according to his system, are insoluble as problems but indispensable as guides -\\\"God, Freedom, and Immortality\\\"-he summarizes them in a formula which appears to be distinctly eighteenth century, Prussian, and Protestant :\",\"PeriodicalId\":410128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Warburg Institute\",\"volume\":\"488 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1938-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Warburg Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/750025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/750025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一般人,甚至是忠实的康德主义者,也承认康德所采用的分类方法,在很大程度上是受经院传统的影响。康德的辩护者急于断言,这些经院术语的痕迹只影响康德表述的外在形式,并没有深入到他的思想中心。但是,在智力问题上,表面与深度的区别总是有害的;如果说在康德的论证中可以把形式和精神分开而不损害它们的意义,那就既不正确,也不太过誉了。事实上,如果我们要从康德的著作中删去那些在形式上具有明显中世纪风格的部分,我们就不得不省略一段,这段话通常被认为是康德最具个性的表达之一。在讨论三个形而上学的问题时,按照他的体系,这三个问题作为问题是不能解决的,但作为指导是不可缺少的——“上帝、自由和不朽”——他用一个公式总结了它们,这个公式显然是18世纪、普鲁士和新教的:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Mediæval Formula in Kant
t is generally admitted, even by loyal Kantians, that the methods of classification employed by Kant owe much to the scholastic tradition. Defenders of Kant have been anxious to assert that these traces of scholastic terminology affect merely the external form of Kant's presentation and do not penetrate to the centre of his thought. But distinctions between surface and depth are always pernicious in intellectual matters; and it is neither a correct nor a very flattering reflection on Kant to claim that the form and the spirit can be separated in his arguments without detriment to their meaning. Actually, if we were to leave out from Kant's writings those parts which are strikingly medieval in form, we should have to omit even one passage which is generally -and justly-regarded as one of his most characteristically personal expressions. In discussing the three metaphysical questions which, according to his system, are insoluble as problems but indispensable as guides -"God, Freedom, and Immortality"-he summarizes them in a formula which appears to be distinctly eighteenth century, Prussian, and Protestant :
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信