半权参考的神话

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI Pub Date : 2022-08-06 DOI:10.29173/cais1251

Leah Dudak

{"title":"半权参考的神话","authors":"Leah Dudak","doi":"10.29173/cais1251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been said and re-said that reference librarians only answer roughly 50% of referencequestions correctly. But while this statistic is passed around as fact - where does it come from? Inthis paper, I track down the elusive citation using backwards chaining, citation analysis, andhistorical tracing. And then, I will re-examine the study that appeared to start it all through amodern lens, ultimately suggesting that we abandon the idea of half right reference once and forall.","PeriodicalId":102465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The myth of half right reference\",\"authors\":\"Leah Dudak\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/cais1251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has been said and re-said that reference librarians only answer roughly 50% of referencequestions correctly. But while this statistic is passed around as fact - where does it come from? Inthis paper, I track down the elusive citation using backwards chaining, citation analysis, andhistorical tracing. And then, I will re-examine the study that appeared to start it all through amodern lens, ultimately suggesting that we abandon the idea of half right reference once and forall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

人们不断地说，参考图书管理员只能正确回答大约50%的参考问题。但是，虽然这一统计数据被当作事实传播，但它从何而来?本文采用回溯链法、引文分析法和历史追溯法对难以捉摸的引文进行追踪。然后，我将重新审视这项研究，它似乎是从现代的角度开始的，最终建议我们一劳永逸地放弃半正确参考的想法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The myth of half right reference

It has been said and re-said that reference librarians only answer roughly 50% of referencequestions correctly. But while this statistic is passed around as fact - where does it come from? Inthis paper, I track down the elusive citation using backwards chaining, citation analysis, andhistorical tracing. And then, I will re-examine the study that appeared to start it all through amodern lens, ultimately suggesting that we abandon the idea of half right reference once and forall.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l'ACSI

自引率

0.00%

发文量