在努力加工过程中前额叶的激活区分了有记忆抱怨的成人的记忆能力。

Michael K Yeung, T. Lee, A. Chan
{"title":"在努力加工过程中前额叶的激活区分了有记忆抱怨的成人的记忆能力。","authors":"Michael K Yeung, T. Lee, A. Chan","doi":"10.3233/jad-220130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIdentifying individuals at increased risks for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for early intervention. Memory complaints are associated with brain abnormalities characteristic of AD in cognitively normal older people. However, the utility of memory complaints for predicting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD onset remains controversial, likely due to the heterogeneous nature of this construct.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nWe investigated whether prefrontal oxygenation changes measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during an arduous cognitive task, previously shown to be associated with the AD syndrome, could differentiate memory abilities among individuals with memory complaints. Episodic memory performance was adopted as a proxy for MCI/AD risks since it has been shown to predict AD progression across stages.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThirty-six adults self-reporting memory complaints in the absence of memory impairment completed a verbal list learning test and underwent a digit n-back paradigm with an easy (0-back) and a difficult (2-back) condition. K-means clustering was applied to empirically derive memory complaint subgroups based on fNIRS-based prefrontal oxygenation changes during the effortful 2-back task.\n\n\nRESULTS\nCluster analysis revealed two subgroups characterized by high (n = 12) and low (n = 24) bilateral prefrontal activation during the 2-back but not a 0-back task. The low activation group was significantly less accurate across the n-back task and recalled significantly fewer words on the verbal memory test compared to the high activation group.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nfNIRS may have the potential to differentiate verbal memory abilities in individuals with self-reported memory complaints.","PeriodicalId":219895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prefrontal Activation During Effortful Processing Differentiates Memory Abilities in Adults with Memory Complaints.\",\"authors\":\"Michael K Yeung, T. Lee, A. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/jad-220130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nIdentifying individuals at increased risks for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for early intervention. Memory complaints are associated with brain abnormalities characteristic of AD in cognitively normal older people. However, the utility of memory complaints for predicting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD onset remains controversial, likely due to the heterogeneous nature of this construct.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nWe investigated whether prefrontal oxygenation changes measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during an arduous cognitive task, previously shown to be associated with the AD syndrome, could differentiate memory abilities among individuals with memory complaints. Episodic memory performance was adopted as a proxy for MCI/AD risks since it has been shown to predict AD progression across stages.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThirty-six adults self-reporting memory complaints in the absence of memory impairment completed a verbal list learning test and underwent a digit n-back paradigm with an easy (0-back) and a difficult (2-back) condition. K-means clustering was applied to empirically derive memory complaint subgroups based on fNIRS-based prefrontal oxygenation changes during the effortful 2-back task.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nCluster analysis revealed two subgroups characterized by high (n = 12) and low (n = 24) bilateral prefrontal activation during the 2-back but not a 0-back task. The low activation group was significantly less accurate across the n-back task and recalled significantly fewer words on the verbal memory test compared to the high activation group.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nfNIRS may have the potential to differentiate verbal memory abilities in individuals with self-reported memory complaints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-220130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-220130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景识别阿尔茨海默病(AD)风险增加的个体对于早期干预至关重要。在认知正常的老年人中,记忆抱怨与AD特有的大脑异常有关。然而,记忆抱怨预测轻度认知障碍(MCI)或AD发病的效用仍然存在争议,可能是由于这种结构的异质性。目的:我们研究了功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)在艰巨的认知任务中测量的前额叶氧合变化是否可以区分记忆障碍患者的记忆能力,该变化之前被证明与AD综合征有关。情景记忆表现被采用作为MCI/AD风险的代理,因为它已被证明可以预测AD在各个阶段的进展。方法36例无记忆障碍的自我报告记忆投诉成人完成了一项言语列表学习测试,并进行了简单(0-back)和困难(2-back)的数字n-back范式测试。基于基于fnir的前额叶氧合变化,应用K-means聚类经验推导记忆抱怨亚组。结果聚类分析显示双侧前额叶在2-back任务时激活程度高(n = 12)和低(n = 24),而在0-back任务时没有。与高激活组相比,低激活组在n-back任务中的准确性明显较低,在言语记忆测试中回忆的单词也明显较少。结论fnirs可能具有区分自我报告的记忆抱怨个体的言语记忆能力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prefrontal Activation During Effortful Processing Differentiates Memory Abilities in Adults with Memory Complaints.
BACKGROUND Identifying individuals at increased risks for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for early intervention. Memory complaints are associated with brain abnormalities characteristic of AD in cognitively normal older people. However, the utility of memory complaints for predicting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD onset remains controversial, likely due to the heterogeneous nature of this construct. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether prefrontal oxygenation changes measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during an arduous cognitive task, previously shown to be associated with the AD syndrome, could differentiate memory abilities among individuals with memory complaints. Episodic memory performance was adopted as a proxy for MCI/AD risks since it has been shown to predict AD progression across stages. METHODS Thirty-six adults self-reporting memory complaints in the absence of memory impairment completed a verbal list learning test and underwent a digit n-back paradigm with an easy (0-back) and a difficult (2-back) condition. K-means clustering was applied to empirically derive memory complaint subgroups based on fNIRS-based prefrontal oxygenation changes during the effortful 2-back task. RESULTS Cluster analysis revealed two subgroups characterized by high (n = 12) and low (n = 24) bilateral prefrontal activation during the 2-back but not a 0-back task. The low activation group was significantly less accurate across the n-back task and recalled significantly fewer words on the verbal memory test compared to the high activation group. CONCLUSION fNIRS may have the potential to differentiate verbal memory abilities in individuals with self-reported memory complaints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信