牛复合饲料的蛋白质评价:甘蔗测量值和表格值的比较

J. D. Boever, J. Vanacker, D. Bogaerts, C. Boucqué
{"title":"牛复合饲料的蛋白质评价:甘蔗测量值和表格值的比较","authors":"J. D. Boever, J. Vanacker, D. Bogaerts, C. Boucqué","doi":"10.18174/NJAS.V43I3.568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The supply of true protein to the small intestine (DVE) and the degraded protein balance (OEB) of 29 experimental compound feeds were estimated in the rumen and intestine of dairy cows (reference), using the nylon bag technique. DVE and OEB were also calculated from tabulated values of the ingredients, taken from the Dutch CVB-tables, assuming additive effects. Reference DVE was on average 11 g/kg DM lower and OEB 6 g/kg DM higher than tabulated values, resulting from a higher rumen degradability of protein (-5.5 percentage units) and lower intestinal digestibility of rumen undegradable protein (-2.0 percentage units) and a lower rumen degradability of starch (+5.8% units) and DOM-content (+27 g/kg DM). The possible causes of these differences are discussed. After elimination of systemic differences, residual errors between reference and tabular values amounted to 5.9 and 14.9% for DVE and OEB, respectively. It is concluded that a reasonable relation exists between DVE- and OEB-content of compound feeds based on tabular values for the ingredients and those calculated from in sacco measurements.","PeriodicalId":324908,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protein evaluation of cattle compound feeds: comparison of in sacco measurements and tabular values\",\"authors\":\"J. D. Boever, J. Vanacker, D. Bogaerts, C. Boucqué\",\"doi\":\"10.18174/NJAS.V43I3.568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The supply of true protein to the small intestine (DVE) and the degraded protein balance (OEB) of 29 experimental compound feeds were estimated in the rumen and intestine of dairy cows (reference), using the nylon bag technique. DVE and OEB were also calculated from tabulated values of the ingredients, taken from the Dutch CVB-tables, assuming additive effects. Reference DVE was on average 11 g/kg DM lower and OEB 6 g/kg DM higher than tabulated values, resulting from a higher rumen degradability of protein (-5.5 percentage units) and lower intestinal digestibility of rumen undegradable protein (-2.0 percentage units) and a lower rumen degradability of starch (+5.8% units) and DOM-content (+27 g/kg DM). The possible causes of these differences are discussed. After elimination of systemic differences, residual errors between reference and tabular values amounted to 5.9 and 14.9% for DVE and OEB, respectively. It is concluded that a reasonable relation exists between DVE- and OEB-content of compound feeds based on tabular values for the ingredients and those calculated from in sacco measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18174/NJAS.V43I3.568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18174/NJAS.V43I3.568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

采用尼龙袋法测定29种试验配合饲料在奶牛瘤胃和肠道中的小肠真蛋白质供应(DVE)和降解蛋白质平衡(OEB)。DVE和OEB也从荷兰cvb表中列出的成分值计算,假设加性效应。参考DVE平均比表中值低11 g/kg DM, OEB平均比表中值高6 g/kg DM,原因是瘤胃蛋白质可降解性较高(-5.5个百分点),瘤胃不可降解蛋白质肠道消化率较低(-2.0个百分点),淀粉可降解性较低(+5.8%),dom含量较低(+27 g/kg DM)。讨论了这些差异的可能原因。排除系统差异后,DVE和OEB参考值与表值的残差分别为5.9%和14.9%。根据原料表值和烟叶测量值,得出配合饲料中DVE-和oeb -含量之间存在合理的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protein evaluation of cattle compound feeds: comparison of in sacco measurements and tabular values
The supply of true protein to the small intestine (DVE) and the degraded protein balance (OEB) of 29 experimental compound feeds were estimated in the rumen and intestine of dairy cows (reference), using the nylon bag technique. DVE and OEB were also calculated from tabulated values of the ingredients, taken from the Dutch CVB-tables, assuming additive effects. Reference DVE was on average 11 g/kg DM lower and OEB 6 g/kg DM higher than tabulated values, resulting from a higher rumen degradability of protein (-5.5 percentage units) and lower intestinal digestibility of rumen undegradable protein (-2.0 percentage units) and a lower rumen degradability of starch (+5.8% units) and DOM-content (+27 g/kg DM). The possible causes of these differences are discussed. After elimination of systemic differences, residual errors between reference and tabular values amounted to 5.9 and 14.9% for DVE and OEB, respectively. It is concluded that a reasonable relation exists between DVE- and OEB-content of compound feeds based on tabular values for the ingredients and those calculated from in sacco measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信