诊断推理模型的错误来源

Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94 Pub Date : 1994-09-20 DOI:10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381593

H. Dill

{"title":"诊断推理模型的错误来源","authors":"H. Dill","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Application of tools such as WSTA, DARTS, STAT and STAMP is now widely accepted as a viable approach to determining the testability of systems and developing rigorous and efficient test strategies. These tools an have one thing in common-the dependency model, more recently known as the diagnostic inference model. The author discusses error sources that can corrupt a dependency model and introduce significant error into the testability predictions and diagnostic sequence recommendations provided by inference model based tools.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":308840,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Inference Model error sources\",\"authors\":\"H. Dill\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Application of tools such as WSTA, DARTS, STAT and STAMP is now widely accepted as a viable approach to determining the testability of systems and developing rigorous and efficient test strategies. These tools an have one thing in common-the dependency model, more recently known as the diagnostic inference model. The author discusses error sources that can corrupt a dependency model and introduce significant error into the testability predictions and diagnostic sequence recommendations provided by inference model based tools.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":308840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

摘要

WSTA、dart、STAT和STAMP等工具的应用现在被广泛接受为确定系统可测试性和开发严格有效的测试策略的可行方法。这些工具有一个共同点——依赖关系模型，最近被称为诊断推理模型。作者讨论了可能破坏依赖模型的错误来源，并在基于推理模型的工具提供的可测试性预测和诊断序列建议中引入重大错误。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Diagnostic Inference Model error sources

Application of tools such as WSTA, DARTS, STAT and STAMP is now widely accepted as a viable approach to determining the testability of systems and developing rigorous and efficient test strategies. These tools an have one thing in common-the dependency model, more recently known as the diagnostic inference model. The author discusses error sources that can corrupt a dependency model and introduce significant error into the testability predictions and diagnostic sequence recommendations provided by inference model based tools.<>

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of AUTOTESTCON '94

自引率

0.00%

发文量