{"title":"翻译中的罗斯金:《直到最后》在几种欧洲语言中的版本——对约翰·罗斯金社会思想的接受史","authors":"Jean-Yves Tizot","doi":"10.30687/978-88-6969-487-5/022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proposes to review the reception and transmission of John Ruskin’s social thought as expressed in Unto this Last (1862), translated and edited in different European languages. The text itself offers little room for variation, so that interpretations are voiced mainly in the editors’ introductions or afterwords, when they exist. This study finds that very few foreign versions do justice to Ruskin’s radicalism in his anti-capitalist and anti-industrial critique of modern society, his rejection of ‘progress’ and his refutation of political economy, while most take advantage of the occasion to express their own political and social views, often in blatant betrayal of Ruskin’s ideas.","PeriodicalId":370948,"journal":{"name":"Sources, Literatures, Arts & Landscapes of Europe","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ruskin in Translation: Versions of Unto this Last in a Few Europeans Languages\\n Toward a Reception History of John Ruskin’s Social Thought\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Yves Tizot\",\"doi\":\"10.30687/978-88-6969-487-5/022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article proposes to review the reception and transmission of John Ruskin’s social thought as expressed in Unto this Last (1862), translated and edited in different European languages. The text itself offers little room for variation, so that interpretations are voiced mainly in the editors’ introductions or afterwords, when they exist. This study finds that very few foreign versions do justice to Ruskin’s radicalism in his anti-capitalist and anti-industrial critique of modern society, his rejection of ‘progress’ and his refutation of political economy, while most take advantage of the occasion to express their own political and social views, often in blatant betrayal of Ruskin’s ideas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sources, Literatures, Arts & Landscapes of Europe\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sources, Literatures, Arts & Landscapes of Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-487-5/022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sources, Literatures, Arts & Landscapes of Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-487-5/022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在回顾约翰·罗斯金在《直到最后》(Unto this Last, 1862)一书中所表达的社会思想的接受和传播,该书被翻译和编辑成不同的欧洲语言。文本本身几乎没有变化的余地,所以解释主要是在编辑的介绍或后记中表达的,如果有的话。本研究发现,很少有外国版本公正地对待罗斯金的激进主义,他对现代社会的反资本主义和反工业批判,他对“进步”的拒绝以及他对政治经济学的驳斥,而大多数人都利用这个机会表达自己的政治和社会观点,经常公然背叛罗斯金的思想。
Ruskin in Translation: Versions of Unto this Last in a Few Europeans Languages
Toward a Reception History of John Ruskin’s Social Thought
The article proposes to review the reception and transmission of John Ruskin’s social thought as expressed in Unto this Last (1862), translated and edited in different European languages. The text itself offers little room for variation, so that interpretations are voiced mainly in the editors’ introductions or afterwords, when they exist. This study finds that very few foreign versions do justice to Ruskin’s radicalism in his anti-capitalist and anti-industrial critique of modern society, his rejection of ‘progress’ and his refutation of political economy, while most take advantage of the occasion to express their own political and social views, often in blatant betrayal of Ruskin’s ideas.