{"title":"谷物清洗机测试中的MTBF分析","authors":"P. I. Burak, I. Golubev, A. G. Levshin","doi":"10.33267/2072-9642-2023-4-8-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of the analysis of data on failures of machines and equipment for post-harvest processing of grain, including UZM-30/15-3, MZK-50 MZK-7S, FLEX4.5, ZM-40-F5, “ATM” OVS-25 Smart and “ATM” ОВС-25С Smart. The data obtained during the testing of agricultural machinery (grain cleaning machines) were compared with the information declared by the manufacturers in the technical and operational documentation.","PeriodicalId":169300,"journal":{"name":"Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MTBF Analysis in Testing Grain Cleaning Machines\",\"authors\":\"P. I. Burak, I. Golubev, A. G. Levshin\",\"doi\":\"10.33267/2072-9642-2023-4-8-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of the analysis of data on failures of machines and equipment for post-harvest processing of grain, including UZM-30/15-3, MZK-50 MZK-7S, FLEX4.5, ZM-40-F5, “ATM” OVS-25 Smart and “ATM” ОВС-25С Smart. The data obtained during the testing of agricultural machinery (grain cleaning machines) were compared with the information declared by the manufacturers in the technical and operational documentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33267/2072-9642-2023-4-8-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33267/2072-9642-2023-4-8-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The results of the analysis of data on failures of machines and equipment for post-harvest processing of grain, including UZM-30/15-3, MZK-50 MZK-7S, FLEX4.5, ZM-40-F5, “ATM” OVS-25 Smart and “ATM” ОВС-25С Smart. The data obtained during the testing of agricultural machinery (grain cleaning machines) were compared with the information declared by the manufacturers in the technical and operational documentation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
