Widya Apriani, Anggi Barus, Fadrizal Lubis
{"title":"Uji Eksperimental Respon Struktur 3D Modelling Struktur Portal Open Frame dan Struktur Portal Bresing terhadap Beban Gempa","authors":"Widya Apriani, Anggi Barus, Fadrizal Lubis","doi":"10.35583/jice.v1i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the obstacles in laboratory testing is the availability of testing capacity. So that the similitude method was developed which aims to replicate the state of the prototype by scaling the variables so that they can be tested in the laboratory. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between the results of numerical tests and experimental tests on the response of the open frame portal structure and the braced portal structure to the perpindahan parameters and the driftt ratio of the steel portal structure in earthquake buildings. The method used in this research is the experimental test method. From the analysis results, the largest perpindahan difference between the numerical test and the experimental test of the open frame portal structure is on the 4th floor, with a difference of 21,8 mm, while the largest perpindahan difference in the braced structure is on the 6th floor with a difference of 14,54 mm. The highest perpindahan difference is between numerical tests and experimental tests that occur on the open frame structure are on the 3rd, 4th, and 5th floors while those that occur on the braced structure are on the 5th, 6th, and 7th floors but the experimental perpindahan test is still within the permit limits for structural planning and if reviewed from the driftt ratio results, the results exceed the allowable driftt ratio limit of 2% of the height of each building level located on the 1st and 6th floors of the open frame portal structure and on the 5th floor of the braced portal structure.","PeriodicalId":253918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infrastructure and Civil Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infrastructure and Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35583/jice.v1i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验室测试的障碍之一是测试能力的可用性。因此,相似方法被开发出来,旨在通过缩放变量来复制原型的状态,以便在实验室中进行测试。本研究的目的是确定敞开式门式结构和支撑式门式结构在地震建筑物中对钢门式结构的倾斜度参数和漂移比的响应的数值试验结果与试验结果的差异。本研究采用的方法是实验测试法。从分析结果来看,敞开式框架门式结构数值试验与实验试验偏差最大的是在4层,偏差21.8 mm,而支撑结构偏差最大的是在6层,偏差1454 mm。最大的倾斜度差异是数值测试和实验测试之间的差异,在开放式框架结构上进行的测试是在3楼、4楼和5楼,而在支撑结构上进行的测试是在5楼、6楼和7楼,但实验倾斜度测试仍在结构规划的许可范围内,如果从漂移比结果来看,结果超过了开放框架门式结构的1层和6层以及支撑门式结构的5层每层建筑高度2%的允许漂移比限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uji Eksperimental Respon Struktur 3D Modelling Struktur Portal Open Frame dan Struktur Portal Bresing terhadap Beban Gempa
One of the obstacles in laboratory testing is the availability of testing capacity. So that the similitude method was developed which aims to replicate the state of the prototype by scaling the variables so that they can be tested in the laboratory. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between the results of numerical tests and experimental tests on the response of the open frame portal structure and the braced portal structure to the perpindahan parameters and the driftt ratio of the steel portal structure in earthquake buildings. The method used in this research is the experimental test method. From the analysis results, the largest perpindahan difference between the numerical test and the experimental test of the open frame portal structure is on the 4th floor, with a difference of 21,8 mm, while the largest perpindahan difference in the braced structure is on the 6th floor with a difference of 14,54 mm. The highest perpindahan difference is between numerical tests and experimental tests that occur on the open frame structure are on the 3rd, 4th, and 5th floors while those that occur on the braced structure are on the 5th, 6th, and 7th floors but the experimental perpindahan test is still within the permit limits for structural planning and if reviewed from the driftt ratio results, the results exceed the allowable driftt ratio limit of 2% of the height of each building level located on the 1st and 6th floors of the open frame portal structure and on the 5th floor of the braced portal structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信