商业法规涵盖了标准商业条款对买卖垃圾食品的先决条件的应用

Fiona Vivian, Winda Fitri
{"title":"商业法规涵盖了标准商业条款对买卖垃圾食品的先决条件的应用","authors":"Fiona Vivian, Winda Fitri","doi":"10.31933/unesrev.v4i3.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenon of junk food is growing rapidly at this time. Although most junk food ultimately harms the health of consumers, buying and selling junk food is not illegal. As a general rule, both the seller and the buyer are free to determine the type, content and form of the contract. However, the existence of standard clauses as a means to facilitate sales transactions between producers and consumers has proven to be widely misused by sellers with standard clauses that are detrimental to consumers, such as \"for take away food, an additional fee in the form of a takeaway charge is imposed.\" The application of the standard clause makes the seller has a stronger position and cause losses for the buyer. This type of research is normative legal research. The results show that basically the standard clause is not prohibited, as long as there are no elements that harm other parties. Provisions for the inclusion of standard clauses are regulated in Article 18 of the UU PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN. The advantage of using standard clauses in junk food agreements is that it gives consumers the benefits of time efficiency and equal service, but the disadvantage is that consumers do not have the opportunity to negotiate and decide on the contents of the contract, leaving only the choice of accept or leave. As a result, consumers become vulnerable, there is an imbalance of rights and obligations between economic actors and consumers, and consumers are more disadvantaged.","PeriodicalId":193737,"journal":{"name":"UNES Law Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENERAPAN KLAUSULA BAKU PADA PRASYARAT JUAL BELI JUNK FOOD DITINJAU DARI HUKUM BISNIS\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Vivian, Winda Fitri\",\"doi\":\"10.31933/unesrev.v4i3.248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The phenomenon of junk food is growing rapidly at this time. Although most junk food ultimately harms the health of consumers, buying and selling junk food is not illegal. As a general rule, both the seller and the buyer are free to determine the type, content and form of the contract. However, the existence of standard clauses as a means to facilitate sales transactions between producers and consumers has proven to be widely misused by sellers with standard clauses that are detrimental to consumers, such as \\\"for take away food, an additional fee in the form of a takeaway charge is imposed.\\\" The application of the standard clause makes the seller has a stronger position and cause losses for the buyer. This type of research is normative legal research. The results show that basically the standard clause is not prohibited, as long as there are no elements that harm other parties. Provisions for the inclusion of standard clauses are regulated in Article 18 of the UU PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN. The advantage of using standard clauses in junk food agreements is that it gives consumers the benefits of time efficiency and equal service, but the disadvantage is that consumers do not have the opportunity to negotiate and decide on the contents of the contract, leaving only the choice of accept or leave. As a result, consumers become vulnerable, there is an imbalance of rights and obligations between economic actors and consumers, and consumers are more disadvantaged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNES Law Review\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNES Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v4i3.248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNES Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v4i3.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

垃圾食品的现象在这个时候迅速增长。虽然大多数垃圾食品最终会损害消费者的健康,但购买和销售垃圾食品并不违法。一般来说,买卖双方都可以自由决定合同的类型、内容和形式。然而,作为促进生产者和消费者之间销售交易的一种手段的标准条款的存在,已被证明被销售者广泛滥用,其标准条款对消费者有害,例如“对于外卖食品,以外卖费用的形式收取额外费用”。标准条款的适用使卖方处于更有利的地位,给买方造成损失。这种类型的研究就是规范性法律研究。结果表明,只要不存在损害其他当事人利益的成分,标准条款基本上是不被禁止的。关于加入标准条款的规定见《国际贸易公约》第18条。在垃圾食品协议中使用标准条款的好处是它给消费者带来了时间效率和平等服务的好处,但缺点是消费者没有机会就合同内容进行谈判和决定,只有接受或离开的选择。因此,消费者变得脆弱,经济行为者和消费者之间的权利和义务不平衡,消费者处于更不利的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PENERAPAN KLAUSULA BAKU PADA PRASYARAT JUAL BELI JUNK FOOD DITINJAU DARI HUKUM BISNIS
The phenomenon of junk food is growing rapidly at this time. Although most junk food ultimately harms the health of consumers, buying and selling junk food is not illegal. As a general rule, both the seller and the buyer are free to determine the type, content and form of the contract. However, the existence of standard clauses as a means to facilitate sales transactions between producers and consumers has proven to be widely misused by sellers with standard clauses that are detrimental to consumers, such as "for take away food, an additional fee in the form of a takeaway charge is imposed." The application of the standard clause makes the seller has a stronger position and cause losses for the buyer. This type of research is normative legal research. The results show that basically the standard clause is not prohibited, as long as there are no elements that harm other parties. Provisions for the inclusion of standard clauses are regulated in Article 18 of the UU PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN. The advantage of using standard clauses in junk food agreements is that it gives consumers the benefits of time efficiency and equal service, but the disadvantage is that consumers do not have the opportunity to negotiate and decide on the contents of the contract, leaving only the choice of accept or leave. As a result, consumers become vulnerable, there is an imbalance of rights and obligations between economic actors and consumers, and consumers are more disadvantaged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信