门诊牙科应用硫喷妥钠静脉麻醉与阿霉素静脉麻醉的比较研究。

S Orzechowski
{"title":"门诊牙科应用硫喷妥钠静脉麻醉与阿霉素静脉麻醉的比较研究。","authors":"S Orzechowski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical effects of two intravenous anaesthetics--thiopental and althesin--were compared in a group of 160 outpatients. Each anaesthetic was used in 80 cases. The administration of these anaesthetics was preceded by an intravenous injection of fentanyl and atropine sulphate. Anaesthesia was carried out with the patient sitting in dental chair. The observations confirmed that this method of anaesthesia provides good conditions for carrying out minor dental operations and is safe for the patient, as evidenced by a negligible number of minor complications. A comparison of the results of clinical observations and gasometric determinations indicates that althesin is superior in outpatient practice to thiopental. This simple and easy technique of anaesthesia without the necessity of using expensive apparatus should be widely introduced in outpatient practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":75483,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, resuscitation, and intensive therapy","volume":"4 1","pages":"11-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of intravenous anaesthesia with thiopental versus althesin in outpatient dental practice.\",\"authors\":\"S Orzechowski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical effects of two intravenous anaesthetics--thiopental and althesin--were compared in a group of 160 outpatients. Each anaesthetic was used in 80 cases. The administration of these anaesthetics was preceded by an intravenous injection of fentanyl and atropine sulphate. Anaesthesia was carried out with the patient sitting in dental chair. The observations confirmed that this method of anaesthesia provides good conditions for carrying out minor dental operations and is safe for the patient, as evidenced by a negligible number of minor complications. A comparison of the results of clinical observations and gasometric determinations indicates that althesin is superior in outpatient practice to thiopental. This simple and easy technique of anaesthesia without the necessity of using expensive apparatus should be widely introduced in outpatient practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia, resuscitation, and intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"11-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia, resuscitation, and intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, resuscitation, and intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在160例门诊患者中比较了两种静脉麻醉药——硫喷妥钠和阿拉西辛的临床效果。每种麻醉药应用80例。这些麻醉药的施用之前,静脉注射芬太尼和硫酸阿托品。患者坐在牙科椅上进行麻醉。观察结果证实,这种麻醉方法为进行小型牙科手术提供了良好的条件,对患者是安全的,可以忽略不计的轻微并发症证明了这一点。临床观察结果和气相测定结果的比较表明,在门诊实践中,阿霉素优于硫喷妥钠。这种简单易行的麻醉技术无需使用昂贵的器械,应在门诊广泛推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of intravenous anaesthesia with thiopental versus althesin in outpatient dental practice.

Clinical effects of two intravenous anaesthetics--thiopental and althesin--were compared in a group of 160 outpatients. Each anaesthetic was used in 80 cases. The administration of these anaesthetics was preceded by an intravenous injection of fentanyl and atropine sulphate. Anaesthesia was carried out with the patient sitting in dental chair. The observations confirmed that this method of anaesthesia provides good conditions for carrying out minor dental operations and is safe for the patient, as evidenced by a negligible number of minor complications. A comparison of the results of clinical observations and gasometric determinations indicates that althesin is superior in outpatient practice to thiopental. This simple and easy technique of anaesthesia without the necessity of using expensive apparatus should be widely introduced in outpatient practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信