学习对象存储库的可访问性评估:*注意:在Xplore中不捕获副标题,不应使用

L. Londoño-Rojas, R. Vicari, Néstor Duque-Méndez
{"title":"学习对象存储库的可访问性评估:*注意:在Xplore中不捕获副标题,不应使用","authors":"L. Londoño-Rojas, R. Vicari, Néstor Duque-Méndez","doi":"10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the use of learning objects is an alternative that offers the possibility that a subject can be presented in different forms and formats, which allows the material to be adjusted to the needs of students, however, if the repositories that are the platforms that store and make them available do not satisfy an acceptable level of accessibility, then the learning objects in many cases cannot be used by students. For this reason, the objective of this paper is to review the accessibility of twenty learning object repositories based on the WCAG using three automatic accessibility validators and one short manual evaluation, to identify the accessibility level, the accessibility errors and the accessibility alternatives provided.","PeriodicalId":111811,"journal":{"name":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessibility Evaluation of Learning Object Repositories: *Note: Sub-titles are not captured in Xplore and should not be used\",\"authors\":\"L. Londoño-Rojas, R. Vicari, Néstor Duque-Méndez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, the use of learning objects is an alternative that offers the possibility that a subject can be presented in different forms and formats, which allows the material to be adjusted to the needs of students, however, if the repositories that are the platforms that store and make them available do not satisfy an acceptable level of accessibility, then the learning objects in many cases cannot be used by students. For this reason, the objective of this paper is to review the accessibility of twenty learning object repositories based on the WCAG using three automatic accessibility validators and one short manual evaluation, to identify the accessibility level, the accessibility errors and the accessibility alternatives provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,学习对象的使用是另一种选择,它提供了以不同形式和格式呈现主题的可能性,这使得材料可以根据学生的需要进行调整,但是,如果存储和提供这些材料的平台的存储库不能满足可接受的可访问性水平,那么在许多情况下,学习对象就不能被学生使用。出于这个原因,本文的目标是使用三个自动可访问性验证器和一个简短的手动评估来审查基于WCAG的20个学习对象存储库的可访问性,以确定可访问性级别、可访问性错误和提供的可访问性替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accessibility Evaluation of Learning Object Repositories: *Note: Sub-titles are not captured in Xplore and should not be used
Currently, the use of learning objects is an alternative that offers the possibility that a subject can be presented in different forms and formats, which allows the material to be adjusted to the needs of students, however, if the repositories that are the platforms that store and make them available do not satisfy an acceptable level of accessibility, then the learning objects in many cases cannot be used by students. For this reason, the objective of this paper is to review the accessibility of twenty learning object repositories based on the WCAG using three automatic accessibility validators and one short manual evaluation, to identify the accessibility level, the accessibility errors and the accessibility alternatives provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信