{"title":"学习对象存储库的可访问性评估:*注意:在Xplore中不捕获副标题,不应使用","authors":"L. Londoño-Rojas, R. Vicari, Néstor Duque-Méndez","doi":"10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the use of learning objects is an alternative that offers the possibility that a subject can be presented in different forms and formats, which allows the material to be adjusted to the needs of students, however, if the repositories that are the platforms that store and make them available do not satisfy an acceptable level of accessibility, then the learning objects in many cases cannot be used by students. For this reason, the objective of this paper is to review the accessibility of twenty learning object repositories based on the WCAG using three automatic accessibility validators and one short manual evaluation, to identify the accessibility level, the accessibility errors and the accessibility alternatives provided.","PeriodicalId":111811,"journal":{"name":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessibility Evaluation of Learning Object Repositories: *Note: Sub-titles are not captured in Xplore and should not be used\",\"authors\":\"L. Londoño-Rojas, R. Vicari, Néstor Duque-Méndez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, the use of learning objects is an alternative that offers the possibility that a subject can be presented in different forms and formats, which allows the material to be adjusted to the needs of students, however, if the repositories that are the platforms that store and make them available do not satisfy an acceptable level of accessibility, then the learning objects in many cases cannot be used by students. For this reason, the objective of this paper is to review the accessibility of twenty learning object repositories based on the WCAG using three automatic accessibility validators and one short manual evaluation, to identify the accessibility level, the accessibility errors and the accessibility alternatives provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accessibility Evaluation of Learning Object Repositories: *Note: Sub-titles are not captured in Xplore and should not be used
Currently, the use of learning objects is an alternative that offers the possibility that a subject can be presented in different forms and formats, which allows the material to be adjusted to the needs of students, however, if the repositories that are the platforms that store and make them available do not satisfy an acceptable level of accessibility, then the learning objects in many cases cannot be used by students. For this reason, the objective of this paper is to review the accessibility of twenty learning object repositories based on the WCAG using three automatic accessibility validators and one short manual evaluation, to identify the accessibility level, the accessibility errors and the accessibility alternatives provided.