与非临床项目相比,马来西亚临床项目的本科生在COVID-19大流行期间的心理健康问题较低

Sumaiyah Mat, Jun Jie Teoh, Peiyuan Ding, Muhammad Aiman Wafi Termizi, Muhammad Farhan Norhalim, Nawwal Atikah Badri, Xian Yu Ng, J. Tan, N. A. Mohd Nordin, Normala Mesbah, Deepashini Harithasan, N. Azmi, Asfarina Zanudin, Ismarulyusda Ishak, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh
{"title":"与非临床项目相比,马来西亚临床项目的本科生在COVID-19大流行期间的心理健康问题较低","authors":"Sumaiyah Mat, Jun Jie Teoh, Peiyuan Ding, Muhammad Aiman Wafi Termizi, Muhammad Farhan Norhalim, Nawwal Atikah Badri, Xian Yu Ng, J. Tan, N. A. Mohd Nordin, Normala Mesbah, Deepashini Harithasan, N. Azmi, Asfarina Zanudin, Ismarulyusda Ishak, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh","doi":"10.17576/ajtlhe.1401.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine undergraduates’ mental health status, quality of life and burn-out status in clinical and non-clinical programs as well as its association during COVID-19 pandemic period. A cross sectional survey was carried out by distributing the questionnaire through online social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, and Twitter. Mental health, burn-out statuses and quality of life of the undergraduates were assessed using 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), Copenhagen Burnout Inventory and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF) respectively. A total of 308 respondents (111 from clinical, 197 from non-clinical programs), mean (SD) age=21.88(1.29) years participated in this cross-sectional online survey. The results revealed that undergraduates in the non-clinical programs are more likely to experience higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress, which demonstrated by higher median (IQR) scores in each component of DASS-21 (Non-clinical VS Clinical) [depression, 18 (10-28) VS 8 (2-20); anxiety, 16 (8-26) VS 10 (2-16), and stress, 20 (12-28) VS 12 (4-22)]. Similarly, higher burnout median score, 58.83 (48.83 - 75.00) was noted among undergraduates in non-clinical programs with a lower mean (SD) Q-LES- Q-SF score=58.75 (18.03). Undergraduates from non-peninsular Malaysia showed lower quality of life scores [2.06(1.03-4.13)], while undergraduates with good internet accessibility had higher quality of life scores [2.06(1.03-4.13)]. The association between lower mental health status, QoL and burn-out among non-clinical students remained significant even after adjustment for gender, household income, type of university (IPTA vs IPTS), race, and internet accessibility at university. Our findings suggest that undergraduates from clinical programs had better mental health status and quality of life when compared to their peers from non-clinical programs during COVID-19 pandemic period.","PeriodicalId":214089,"journal":{"name":"Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC WERE LOWER AMONG UNDERGRADUATES IN CLINICAL COMPARED TO NON-CLINICAL PROGRAMS IN MALAYSIA\",\"authors\":\"Sumaiyah Mat, Jun Jie Teoh, Peiyuan Ding, Muhammad Aiman Wafi Termizi, Muhammad Farhan Norhalim, Nawwal Atikah Badri, Xian Yu Ng, J. Tan, N. A. Mohd Nordin, Normala Mesbah, Deepashini Harithasan, N. Azmi, Asfarina Zanudin, Ismarulyusda Ishak, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/ajtlhe.1401.2022.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to determine undergraduates’ mental health status, quality of life and burn-out status in clinical and non-clinical programs as well as its association during COVID-19 pandemic period. A cross sectional survey was carried out by distributing the questionnaire through online social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, and Twitter. Mental health, burn-out statuses and quality of life of the undergraduates were assessed using 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), Copenhagen Burnout Inventory and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF) respectively. A total of 308 respondents (111 from clinical, 197 from non-clinical programs), mean (SD) age=21.88(1.29) years participated in this cross-sectional online survey. The results revealed that undergraduates in the non-clinical programs are more likely to experience higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress, which demonstrated by higher median (IQR) scores in each component of DASS-21 (Non-clinical VS Clinical) [depression, 18 (10-28) VS 8 (2-20); anxiety, 16 (8-26) VS 10 (2-16), and stress, 20 (12-28) VS 12 (4-22)]. Similarly, higher burnout median score, 58.83 (48.83 - 75.00) was noted among undergraduates in non-clinical programs with a lower mean (SD) Q-LES- Q-SF score=58.75 (18.03). Undergraduates from non-peninsular Malaysia showed lower quality of life scores [2.06(1.03-4.13)], while undergraduates with good internet accessibility had higher quality of life scores [2.06(1.03-4.13)]. The association between lower mental health status, QoL and burn-out among non-clinical students remained significant even after adjustment for gender, household income, type of university (IPTA vs IPTS), race, and internet accessibility at university. Our findings suggest that undergraduates from clinical programs had better mental health status and quality of life when compared to their peers from non-clinical programs during COVID-19 pandemic period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/ajtlhe.1401.2022.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/ajtlhe.1401.2022.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解新冠肺炎大流行期间临床和非临床专业本科生的心理健康状况、生活质量和倦怠状况及其相关性。通过WhatsApp、Facebook和Twitter等在线社交媒体平台分发问卷,进行横断面调查。采用21项抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS-21)、哥本哈根倦怠量表(Copenhagen Burnout Inventory)和生活质量享受与满意度问卷(Q-LES-Q-SF)对大学生的心理健康、倦怠状态和生活质量进行测评。共有308名受访者(111名来自临床,197名来自非临床项目),平均(SD)年龄=21.88(1.29)岁参加了本次横断面在线调查。结果表明,非临床专业的大学生更有可能经历更高水平的抑郁、焦虑和压力,这表现在DASS-21(非临床VS临床)各成分的中位数(IQR)得分较高[抑郁,18 (10-28)VS 8 (2-20)];焦虑,16 (8-26)VS 10(2-16),压力,20 (12-28)VS 12(4-22)]。同样,非临床专业本科生的倦怠中位数为58.83(48.83 - 75.00),平均(SD) Q-LES- Q-SF得分为58.75(18.03)。非马来西亚半岛的大学生生活质量得分较低[2.06(1.03-4.13)],而互联网可及性较好的大学生生活质量得分较高[2.06(1.03-4.13)]。即使在调整了性别、家庭收入、大学类型(IPTA vs IPTS)、种族和大学互联网可及性之后,非临床学生较低的心理健康状况、生活质量和倦怠之间的关联仍然显著。我们的研究结果表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,与非临床项目的大学生相比,临床项目的大学生有更好的心理健康状况和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC WERE LOWER AMONG UNDERGRADUATES IN CLINICAL COMPARED TO NON-CLINICAL PROGRAMS IN MALAYSIA
This study aimed to determine undergraduates’ mental health status, quality of life and burn-out status in clinical and non-clinical programs as well as its association during COVID-19 pandemic period. A cross sectional survey was carried out by distributing the questionnaire through online social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, and Twitter. Mental health, burn-out statuses and quality of life of the undergraduates were assessed using 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), Copenhagen Burnout Inventory and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF) respectively. A total of 308 respondents (111 from clinical, 197 from non-clinical programs), mean (SD) age=21.88(1.29) years participated in this cross-sectional online survey. The results revealed that undergraduates in the non-clinical programs are more likely to experience higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress, which demonstrated by higher median (IQR) scores in each component of DASS-21 (Non-clinical VS Clinical) [depression, 18 (10-28) VS 8 (2-20); anxiety, 16 (8-26) VS 10 (2-16), and stress, 20 (12-28) VS 12 (4-22)]. Similarly, higher burnout median score, 58.83 (48.83 - 75.00) was noted among undergraduates in non-clinical programs with a lower mean (SD) Q-LES- Q-SF score=58.75 (18.03). Undergraduates from non-peninsular Malaysia showed lower quality of life scores [2.06(1.03-4.13)], while undergraduates with good internet accessibility had higher quality of life scores [2.06(1.03-4.13)]. The association between lower mental health status, QoL and burn-out among non-clinical students remained significant even after adjustment for gender, household income, type of university (IPTA vs IPTS), race, and internet accessibility at university. Our findings suggest that undergraduates from clinical programs had better mental health status and quality of life when compared to their peers from non-clinical programs during COVID-19 pandemic period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信