{"title":"校园建筑环境对学生可持续活动的影响","authors":"UNAH, M. O, ALI, S. M, JAAFAR, G. A","doi":"10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploring how campus environmental attributes affect student satisfaction and performance inhigher educational institutions continues to be a critical initiative with less attention given byresearchers in Nigerian universities. The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of campusdevelopment in enhancing student’s sustainable activities by assessing the built environment ofBayero University, Kano. A total of 245 questionnaires were administered to students of seven (7)faculties with a view to assessing their satisfaction with campus environment, and 210questionnaires (87.5%) were retrieved. The questionnaire had three sections: (a) respondents’demographic characteristics; (b) assessment of 15 attributes on the physical characteristics ofoutdoor spaces; and (c) assessment of 16 attributes of infrastructural development. The questionswere structured based on 3-point Likert type scale with “Agreed = 3”, “Neutral = 2” and“Disagreed = 1”. Penalty scoring was assigned to the variables. Data collected were subjected tounivariate analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, while Relative Satisfaction Index (RSI)was used to analyze the scores. The study showed that students were more satisfied with thefollowing outdoor attributes: Good environmental conditions (M = 2.090), well maintainedenvironment (M = 2.081), good spatial arrangement (M = 2.044). The respondents weredissatisfied with sport facilities adequacy which got M = 0.986; secured living environment (M =0.945) and lighting adequacy (M = 0.911). On the infrastructural development, the students weresatisfied with the administrative building exterior for having an appealing skyline (M = 2.090).Campus enhanced development (M = 2.044), availability and adequacy of learning facilities (M= 2.081). While they were dissatisfied with reading on outdoor furniture (M = 0.945);availability of social infrastructure within hostels (M = 0.911) and provision of campus cafeteria(M = 0.786). The study concludes that there is the need for proper integration of both outdoorspaces and infrastructural development for students’ performance with improved comfort andwell-being.Keywords: built environment, campus sustainability, outdoor space, students’ perception,","PeriodicalId":292938,"journal":{"name":"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECT OF CAMPUS BUILT ENVIRONMENT ON STUDENTS’ SUSTAINABLE ACTIVITIES\",\"authors\":\"UNAH, M. O, ALI, S. M, JAAFAR, G. A\",\"doi\":\"10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exploring how campus environmental attributes affect student satisfaction and performance inhigher educational institutions continues to be a critical initiative with less attention given byresearchers in Nigerian universities. The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of campusdevelopment in enhancing student’s sustainable activities by assessing the built environment ofBayero University, Kano. A total of 245 questionnaires were administered to students of seven (7)faculties with a view to assessing their satisfaction with campus environment, and 210questionnaires (87.5%) were retrieved. The questionnaire had three sections: (a) respondents’demographic characteristics; (b) assessment of 15 attributes on the physical characteristics ofoutdoor spaces; and (c) assessment of 16 attributes of infrastructural development. The questionswere structured based on 3-point Likert type scale with “Agreed = 3”, “Neutral = 2” and“Disagreed = 1”. Penalty scoring was assigned to the variables. Data collected were subjected tounivariate analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, while Relative Satisfaction Index (RSI)was used to analyze the scores. The study showed that students were more satisfied with thefollowing outdoor attributes: Good environmental conditions (M = 2.090), well maintainedenvironment (M = 2.081), good spatial arrangement (M = 2.044). The respondents weredissatisfied with sport facilities adequacy which got M = 0.986; secured living environment (M =0.945) and lighting adequacy (M = 0.911). On the infrastructural development, the students weresatisfied with the administrative building exterior for having an appealing skyline (M = 2.090).Campus enhanced development (M = 2.044), availability and adequacy of learning facilities (M= 2.081). While they were dissatisfied with reading on outdoor furniture (M = 0.945);availability of social infrastructure within hostels (M = 0.911) and provision of campus cafeteria(M = 0.786). The study concludes that there is the need for proper integration of both outdoorspaces and infrastructural development for students’ performance with improved comfort andwell-being.Keywords: built environment, campus sustainability, outdoor space, students’ perception,\",\"PeriodicalId\":292938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
EFFECT OF CAMPUS BUILT ENVIRONMENT ON STUDENTS’ SUSTAINABLE ACTIVITIES
Exploring how campus environmental attributes affect student satisfaction and performance inhigher educational institutions continues to be a critical initiative with less attention given byresearchers in Nigerian universities. The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of campusdevelopment in enhancing student’s sustainable activities by assessing the built environment ofBayero University, Kano. A total of 245 questionnaires were administered to students of seven (7)faculties with a view to assessing their satisfaction with campus environment, and 210questionnaires (87.5%) were retrieved. The questionnaire had three sections: (a) respondents’demographic characteristics; (b) assessment of 15 attributes on the physical characteristics ofoutdoor spaces; and (c) assessment of 16 attributes of infrastructural development. The questionswere structured based on 3-point Likert type scale with “Agreed = 3”, “Neutral = 2” and“Disagreed = 1”. Penalty scoring was assigned to the variables. Data collected were subjected tounivariate analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, while Relative Satisfaction Index (RSI)was used to analyze the scores. The study showed that students were more satisfied with thefollowing outdoor attributes: Good environmental conditions (M = 2.090), well maintainedenvironment (M = 2.081), good spatial arrangement (M = 2.044). The respondents weredissatisfied with sport facilities adequacy which got M = 0.986; secured living environment (M =0.945) and lighting adequacy (M = 0.911). On the infrastructural development, the students weresatisfied with the administrative building exterior for having an appealing skyline (M = 2.090).Campus enhanced development (M = 2.044), availability and adequacy of learning facilities (M= 2.081). While they were dissatisfied with reading on outdoor furniture (M = 0.945);availability of social infrastructure within hostels (M = 0.911) and provision of campus cafeteria(M = 0.786). The study concludes that there is the need for proper integration of both outdoorspaces and infrastructural development for students’ performance with improved comfort andwell-being.Keywords: built environment, campus sustainability, outdoor space, students’ perception,