校园建筑环境对学生可持续活动的影响

UNAH, M. O, ALI, S. M, JAAFAR, G. A
{"title":"校园建筑环境对学生可持续活动的影响","authors":"UNAH, M. O, ALI, S. M, JAAFAR, G. A","doi":"10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploring how campus environmental attributes affect student satisfaction and performance inhigher educational institutions continues to be a critical initiative with less attention given byresearchers in Nigerian universities. The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of campusdevelopment in enhancing student’s sustainable activities by assessing the built environment ofBayero University, Kano. A total of 245 questionnaires were administered to students of seven (7)faculties with a view to assessing their satisfaction with campus environment, and 210questionnaires (87.5%) were retrieved. The questionnaire had three sections: (a) respondents’demographic characteristics; (b) assessment of 15 attributes on the physical characteristics ofoutdoor spaces; and (c) assessment of 16 attributes of infrastructural development. The questionswere structured based on 3-point Likert type scale with “Agreed = 3”, “Neutral = 2” and“Disagreed = 1”. Penalty scoring was assigned to the variables. Data collected were subjected tounivariate analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, while Relative Satisfaction Index (RSI)was used to analyze the scores. The study showed that students were more satisfied with thefollowing outdoor attributes: Good environmental conditions (M = 2.090), well maintainedenvironment (M = 2.081), good spatial arrangement (M = 2.044). The respondents weredissatisfied with sport facilities adequacy which got M = 0.986; secured living environment (M =0.945) and lighting adequacy (M = 0.911). On the infrastructural development, the students weresatisfied with the administrative building exterior for having an appealing skyline (M = 2.090).Campus enhanced development (M = 2.044), availability and adequacy of learning facilities (M= 2.081). While they were dissatisfied with reading on outdoor furniture (M = 0.945);availability of social infrastructure within hostels (M = 0.911) and provision of campus cafeteria(M = 0.786). The study concludes that there is the need for proper integration of both outdoorspaces and infrastructural development for students’ performance with improved comfort andwell-being.Keywords: built environment, campus sustainability, outdoor space, students’ perception,","PeriodicalId":292938,"journal":{"name":"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECT OF CAMPUS BUILT ENVIRONMENT ON STUDENTS’ SUSTAINABLE ACTIVITIES\",\"authors\":\"UNAH, M. O, ALI, S. M, JAAFAR, G. A\",\"doi\":\"10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exploring how campus environmental attributes affect student satisfaction and performance inhigher educational institutions continues to be a critical initiative with less attention given byresearchers in Nigerian universities. The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of campusdevelopment in enhancing student’s sustainable activities by assessing the built environment ofBayero University, Kano. A total of 245 questionnaires were administered to students of seven (7)faculties with a view to assessing their satisfaction with campus environment, and 210questionnaires (87.5%) were retrieved. The questionnaire had three sections: (a) respondents’demographic characteristics; (b) assessment of 15 attributes on the physical characteristics ofoutdoor spaces; and (c) assessment of 16 attributes of infrastructural development. The questionswere structured based on 3-point Likert type scale with “Agreed = 3”, “Neutral = 2” and“Disagreed = 1”. Penalty scoring was assigned to the variables. Data collected were subjected tounivariate analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, while Relative Satisfaction Index (RSI)was used to analyze the scores. The study showed that students were more satisfied with thefollowing outdoor attributes: Good environmental conditions (M = 2.090), well maintainedenvironment (M = 2.081), good spatial arrangement (M = 2.044). The respondents weredissatisfied with sport facilities adequacy which got M = 0.986; secured living environment (M =0.945) and lighting adequacy (M = 0.911). On the infrastructural development, the students weresatisfied with the administrative building exterior for having an appealing skyline (M = 2.090).Campus enhanced development (M = 2.044), availability and adequacy of learning facilities (M= 2.081). While they were dissatisfied with reading on outdoor furniture (M = 0.945);availability of social infrastructure within hostels (M = 0.911) and provision of campus cafeteria(M = 0.786). The study concludes that there is the need for proper integration of both outdoorspaces and infrastructural development for students’ performance with improved comfort andwell-being.Keywords: built environment, campus sustainability, outdoor space, students’ perception,\",\"PeriodicalId\":292938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56892/bimajst.v6i01.316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探索校园环境属性如何影响高等教育机构的学生满意度和表现仍然是一项重要的倡议,尼日利亚大学的研究人员很少关注。本文的目的是通过评估卡诺巴耶罗大学的建筑环境来研究校园发展对提高学生可持续活动的影响。为了评估学生对校园环境的满意度,我们向7个学院的学生发放了245份问卷,回收了210份问卷(87.5%)。问卷分为三个部分:(a)调查对象的人口学特征;(b)对室外空间物理特征的15个属性进行评估;(c)对基础设施发展的16个属性进行评估。问卷采用李克特3分制,“同意= 3”、“中立= 2”、“不同意= 1”。罚分被分配给变量。收集到的数据进行描述性和推理统计的单变量分析,并使用相对满意度指数(RSI)分析得分。研究表明,学生对户外属性的满意度较高:环境条件好(M = 2.090)、环境维护好(M = 2.081)、空间布置好(M = 2.044)。被调查者对体育设施充分性不满意,M = 0.986;安全的居住环境(M =0.945)和充足的照明(M = 0.911)。在基础设施发展方面,学生对行政大楼的外观感到满意,因为它有一个吸引人的天际线(M = 2.090)。校园加强发展(M= 2.044),学习设施的可用性和充分性(M= 2.081)。而对户外家具阅读(M = 0.945)、宿舍内社会基础设施的可用性(M = 0.911)和校园自助餐厅的提供(M = 0.786)不满意。该研究的结论是,为了提高学生的表现,需要适当地整合户外空间和基础设施的发展,提高学生的舒适度和幸福感。关键词:建筑环境,校园可持续性,户外空间,学生感知
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECT OF CAMPUS BUILT ENVIRONMENT ON STUDENTS’ SUSTAINABLE ACTIVITIES
Exploring how campus environmental attributes affect student satisfaction and performance inhigher educational institutions continues to be a critical initiative with less attention given byresearchers in Nigerian universities. The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of campusdevelopment in enhancing student’s sustainable activities by assessing the built environment ofBayero University, Kano. A total of 245 questionnaires were administered to students of seven (7)faculties with a view to assessing their satisfaction with campus environment, and 210questionnaires (87.5%) were retrieved. The questionnaire had three sections: (a) respondents’demographic characteristics; (b) assessment of 15 attributes on the physical characteristics ofoutdoor spaces; and (c) assessment of 16 attributes of infrastructural development. The questionswere structured based on 3-point Likert type scale with “Agreed = 3”, “Neutral = 2” and“Disagreed = 1”. Penalty scoring was assigned to the variables. Data collected were subjected tounivariate analysis of descriptive and inferential statistics, while Relative Satisfaction Index (RSI)was used to analyze the scores. The study showed that students were more satisfied with thefollowing outdoor attributes: Good environmental conditions (M = 2.090), well maintainedenvironment (M = 2.081), good spatial arrangement (M = 2.044). The respondents weredissatisfied with sport facilities adequacy which got M = 0.986; secured living environment (M =0.945) and lighting adequacy (M = 0.911). On the infrastructural development, the students weresatisfied with the administrative building exterior for having an appealing skyline (M = 2.090).Campus enhanced development (M = 2.044), availability and adequacy of learning facilities (M= 2.081). While they were dissatisfied with reading on outdoor furniture (M = 0.945);availability of social infrastructure within hostels (M = 0.911) and provision of campus cafeteria(M = 0.786). The study concludes that there is the need for proper integration of both outdoorspaces and infrastructural development for students’ performance with improved comfort andwell-being.Keywords: built environment, campus sustainability, outdoor space, students’ perception,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书