学历对外科住院医师规范化培训临床技能完成考核结果的影响

Yupeng Zhang, Ya-jun Wang, Lifen Chen
{"title":"学历对外科住院医师规范化培训临床技能完成考核结果的影响","authors":"Yupeng Zhang, Ya-jun Wang, Lifen Chen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-677X.2020.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the influence of different academic qualifications on the results of standardized training graduation exam of surgical residents, and to put forward corresponding suggestions for formulating training plans for surgical residents. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom 2014 to 2016, 1 387 surgical residents in Beijing were selected as the subjects for the study, and the related factors were analyzed retrospectively. According to the highest academic qualifications obtained by the candidates in the examination, the candidates are divided into bachelor group, master group and doctor group. Using the methods of difference analysis, chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, the scores of different modules of the 7-station and the passing rates of the three groups of candidates in clinical skill examination are compared. \n \n \nResults \nAmong 1 387 candidates, 540 were in the bachelor group, 460 were in the master group and 387 were in the doctor group. There was a significant difference about passing rate among bachelor group 63.9% (345/540) , master group 74.2% (341/460) and doctor group 75.7% (293/387) (P 0.05). Multivariate ANOVA analysis showed that among bachelor group, master group and doctor group, the scores of assistant examinations [(73.90±8.25) vs (75.76±8.86) vs (77.26±8.25)], medical documents [(69.71±22.85) vs (66.86±23.19) vs (72.17±23.40)], case analysis [(83.82±10.18) vs (83.43±8.14) vs (85.18±7.84)], humanistic communication [(87.62±8.05) vs (87.86±23.19) vs (72.17±23.40)] have significant differences (All P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe standardized training programs of surgical residents with different degrees should be different. In terms of training design, doctor degree students should mainly fill in the shortcomings such as surgical operation, and the training period of rotation can be reduced or exempted. The rotation period for master degree students should not be reduced, however, their traning plan should focus more on filling in the shortcomings. Bachelor degree students should conduct systematic clinical training in accordance with the training program. \n \n \nKey words: \nResidents; Standardized training; Surgery; Education; Skill examination","PeriodicalId":427675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Medical Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of academic degree on the result of clinical skill completion examination of standardized training for surgical residents\",\"authors\":\"Yupeng Zhang, Ya-jun Wang, Lifen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-677X.2020.02.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo analyze the influence of different academic qualifications on the results of standardized training graduation exam of surgical residents, and to put forward corresponding suggestions for formulating training plans for surgical residents. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom 2014 to 2016, 1 387 surgical residents in Beijing were selected as the subjects for the study, and the related factors were analyzed retrospectively. According to the highest academic qualifications obtained by the candidates in the examination, the candidates are divided into bachelor group, master group and doctor group. Using the methods of difference analysis, chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, the scores of different modules of the 7-station and the passing rates of the three groups of candidates in clinical skill examination are compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAmong 1 387 candidates, 540 were in the bachelor group, 460 were in the master group and 387 were in the doctor group. There was a significant difference about passing rate among bachelor group 63.9% (345/540) , master group 74.2% (341/460) and doctor group 75.7% (293/387) (P 0.05). Multivariate ANOVA analysis showed that among bachelor group, master group and doctor group, the scores of assistant examinations [(73.90±8.25) vs (75.76±8.86) vs (77.26±8.25)], medical documents [(69.71±22.85) vs (66.86±23.19) vs (72.17±23.40)], case analysis [(83.82±10.18) vs (83.43±8.14) vs (85.18±7.84)], humanistic communication [(87.62±8.05) vs (87.86±23.19) vs (72.17±23.40)] have significant differences (All P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe standardized training programs of surgical residents with different degrees should be different. In terms of training design, doctor degree students should mainly fill in the shortcomings such as surgical operation, and the training period of rotation can be reduced or exempted. The rotation period for master degree students should not be reduced, however, their traning plan should focus more on filling in the shortcomings. Bachelor degree students should conduct systematic clinical training in accordance with the training program. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nResidents; Standardized training; Surgery; Education; Skill examination\",\"PeriodicalId\":427675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-677X.2020.02.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-677X.2020.02.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的分析不同学历对外科住院医师规范化培训毕业考试成绩的影响,为制定外科住院医师培训计划提出相应建议。方法选取2014 - 2016年北京市外科住院医师1387例为研究对象,回顾性分析相关因素。根据考生在考试中获得的最高学历,将考生分为学士组、硕士组和博士组。采用差异分析、卡方检验和logistic回归分析等方法,比较7站不同模块的得分和三组考生临床技能考试合格率。结果1387名考生中,本科组540人,硕士组460人,博士组387人。本科组通过率为63.9%(345/540),硕士组为74.2%(341/460),博士组为75.7%(293/387),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素方差分析显示,本科组、硕士组和博士组在辅助检查得分[(73.90±8.25)vs(75.76±8.86)vs(77.26±8.25)]、医学文献得分[(69.71±22.85)vs(66.86±23.19)vs(72.17±23.40)]、病例分析得分[(83.82±10.18)vs(83.43±8.14)vs(85.18±7.84)]、人文交流得分[(87.62±8.05)vs(87.86±23.19)vs(72.17±23.40)]差异均有统计学意义(均P 0.05)。结论不同学位外科住院医师的规范化培训方案应有所不同。在培养设计上,博士学位学生应主要补足外科手术等短板,并可减少或免除轮训时间。硕士研究生的轮转周期不应缩短,但其培养计划应更加注重补短板。本科学生应按照培训计划进行系统的临床培训。关键词:居民;标准化的培训;手术;教育;技能考试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of academic degree on the result of clinical skill completion examination of standardized training for surgical residents
Objective To analyze the influence of different academic qualifications on the results of standardized training graduation exam of surgical residents, and to put forward corresponding suggestions for formulating training plans for surgical residents. Methods From 2014 to 2016, 1 387 surgical residents in Beijing were selected as the subjects for the study, and the related factors were analyzed retrospectively. According to the highest academic qualifications obtained by the candidates in the examination, the candidates are divided into bachelor group, master group and doctor group. Using the methods of difference analysis, chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, the scores of different modules of the 7-station and the passing rates of the three groups of candidates in clinical skill examination are compared. Results Among 1 387 candidates, 540 were in the bachelor group, 460 were in the master group and 387 were in the doctor group. There was a significant difference about passing rate among bachelor group 63.9% (345/540) , master group 74.2% (341/460) and doctor group 75.7% (293/387) (P 0.05). Multivariate ANOVA analysis showed that among bachelor group, master group and doctor group, the scores of assistant examinations [(73.90±8.25) vs (75.76±8.86) vs (77.26±8.25)], medical documents [(69.71±22.85) vs (66.86±23.19) vs (72.17±23.40)], case analysis [(83.82±10.18) vs (83.43±8.14) vs (85.18±7.84)], humanistic communication [(87.62±8.05) vs (87.86±23.19) vs (72.17±23.40)] have significant differences (All P 0.05). Conclusions The standardized training programs of surgical residents with different degrees should be different. In terms of training design, doctor degree students should mainly fill in the shortcomings such as surgical operation, and the training period of rotation can be reduced or exempted. The rotation period for master degree students should not be reduced, however, their traning plan should focus more on filling in the shortcomings. Bachelor degree students should conduct systematic clinical training in accordance with the training program. Key words: Residents; Standardized training; Surgery; Education; Skill examination
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信