任务完成策略的性别差异:马拉松运动员的分析

Eric J. Allen, Patricia M. Dechow
{"title":"任务完成策略的性别差异:马拉松运动员的分析","authors":"Eric J. Allen, Patricia M. Dechow","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3536645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the strategies adopted by people completing a well-defined but difficult task: running a marathon. We find that men relative to women, undertake riskier running strategies, which increases the likelihood of a fast finish time but also increases the risk of a very poor race outcome. We show that engaging in this risky running strategy is mitigated for men who set themselves an internal goal of beating a round number finish time (e.g., 4:00 hours) and for men who have more experience (i.e., fast runners). These findings suggest that engaging in pre-race planning and setting a time goal is more helpful for males because it combats their tendency to exert too much effort early in the race. Female runners on the other hand, run more conservatively whether or not they have set themselves a round number time goal or have more experience. Furthermore, women appear to care much less about beating round number times, suggesting that women place less weight on the “bragging rights” offered by this goal. Overall, our results suggest that the genders differ in the strategies they adopt to run a marathon and that setting a round finish time goal has a positive influence on male behavior.","PeriodicalId":117634,"journal":{"name":"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in the Strategies Used for Task Completion: An Analysis of Marathon Runners\",\"authors\":\"Eric J. Allen, Patricia M. Dechow\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3536645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the strategies adopted by people completing a well-defined but difficult task: running a marathon. We find that men relative to women, undertake riskier running strategies, which increases the likelihood of a fast finish time but also increases the risk of a very poor race outcome. We show that engaging in this risky running strategy is mitigated for men who set themselves an internal goal of beating a round number finish time (e.g., 4:00 hours) and for men who have more experience (i.e., fast runners). These findings suggest that engaging in pre-race planning and setting a time goal is more helpful for males because it combats their tendency to exert too much effort early in the race. Female runners on the other hand, run more conservatively whether or not they have set themselves a round number time goal or have more experience. Furthermore, women appear to care much less about beating round number times, suggesting that women place less weight on the “bragging rights” offered by this goal. Overall, our results suggest that the genders differ in the strategies they adopt to run a marathon and that setting a round finish time goal has a positive influence on male behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3536645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3536645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们研究了人们在完成一项明确但困难的任务时所采用的策略:跑马拉松。我们发现,与女性相比,男性会采取更冒险的跑步策略,这增加了快速完成比赛的可能性,但也增加了比赛结果非常糟糕的风险。我们的研究表明,对于那些为自己设定一个整数完成时间(例如,4小时)的内部目标的男性和那些有更多经验的男性(例如,快跑者)来说,参与这种冒险的跑步策略是减轻的。这些发现表明,参与赛前计划和设定时间目标对男性更有帮助,因为这可以防止他们在比赛初期付出太多努力。另一方面,无论女性跑步者是否为自己设定了一个整数时间目标或是否有更多的经验,她们都跑得更保守。此外,女性似乎不太关心击败整数的次数,这表明女性不太重视这个目标提供的“炫耀权利”。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,男女在跑马拉松时采用的策略不同,设定一个完整的完成时间目标对男性的行为有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Differences in the Strategies Used for Task Completion: An Analysis of Marathon Runners
We examine the strategies adopted by people completing a well-defined but difficult task: running a marathon. We find that men relative to women, undertake riskier running strategies, which increases the likelihood of a fast finish time but also increases the risk of a very poor race outcome. We show that engaging in this risky running strategy is mitigated for men who set themselves an internal goal of beating a round number finish time (e.g., 4:00 hours) and for men who have more experience (i.e., fast runners). These findings suggest that engaging in pre-race planning and setting a time goal is more helpful for males because it combats their tendency to exert too much effort early in the race. Female runners on the other hand, run more conservatively whether or not they have set themselves a round number time goal or have more experience. Furthermore, women appear to care much less about beating round number times, suggesting that women place less weight on the “bragging rights” offered by this goal. Overall, our results suggest that the genders differ in the strategies they adopt to run a marathon and that setting a round finish time goal has a positive influence on male behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信