衡量智能电子学习教育系统的重要性

Shao-Hsun Chang, Ching-Wen Chang, Hsing-Hui Chen, Mao-Chuan Wu
{"title":"衡量智能电子学习教育系统的重要性","authors":"Shao-Hsun Chang, Ching-Wen Chang, Hsing-Hui Chen, Mao-Chuan Wu","doi":"10.1145/3568739.3568810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in information technology facilitate new (or improved) educational and training practices, creating opportunities for new methods and tools; while also, these technologies are changing the educational paradigm. In the past, smart education frameworks were mostly qualitative studies, describing the conceptual framework (and its connotations) of smart educational systems. Although these conceptually structured smart education systems can promote student learning, peer and teacher interaction, and teaching practice, which assist in understanding students’ status and needs in multiple ways and providing students with real-time synchronous/asynchronous guidance and help, unfortunately, many qualitative studies in the past still lack quantitative data to verify the priority of E-Education planning. The experts surveyed by AHP in this article are selected from E-learning and information technology, with a total of 14 people. The results from the software, Expert Choice, found that in the planning of the smart education system, the importance order of the main criteria, from the most important to the least were smart classroom function, technology-based learning system (IoT, Metaverse), teaching monitoring system, conceptual elements of smart learning, respectively. The sub-criteria weight values showed the key factors of E-Learning Education Planning, which in order were educational resources optimization, teaching is differentiated from person to person, students’ cooperation learning, course completion rate, reliable wireless connection (Wi-Fi, IoT apps, Wearable technology). Finally, the least important were smart pedagogies based on learning theory, learning attention detection, and system data backup. In terms of contribution, to our knowledge, very few studies have used the AHP model and hierarchical design method presenting in the current research to quantitatively demonstrate smart education planning and lecture design, to identify and verify the feasibility model of smart education.","PeriodicalId":200698,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Importance of Smart E-learning education system\",\"authors\":\"Shao-Hsun Chang, Ching-Wen Chang, Hsing-Hui Chen, Mao-Chuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3568739.3568810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advances in information technology facilitate new (or improved) educational and training practices, creating opportunities for new methods and tools; while also, these technologies are changing the educational paradigm. In the past, smart education frameworks were mostly qualitative studies, describing the conceptual framework (and its connotations) of smart educational systems. Although these conceptually structured smart education systems can promote student learning, peer and teacher interaction, and teaching practice, which assist in understanding students’ status and needs in multiple ways and providing students with real-time synchronous/asynchronous guidance and help, unfortunately, many qualitative studies in the past still lack quantitative data to verify the priority of E-Education planning. The experts surveyed by AHP in this article are selected from E-learning and information technology, with a total of 14 people. The results from the software, Expert Choice, found that in the planning of the smart education system, the importance order of the main criteria, from the most important to the least were smart classroom function, technology-based learning system (IoT, Metaverse), teaching monitoring system, conceptual elements of smart learning, respectively. The sub-criteria weight values showed the key factors of E-Learning Education Planning, which in order were educational resources optimization, teaching is differentiated from person to person, students’ cooperation learning, course completion rate, reliable wireless connection (Wi-Fi, IoT apps, Wearable technology). Finally, the least important were smart pedagogies based on learning theory, learning attention detection, and system data backup. In terms of contribution, to our knowledge, very few studies have used the AHP model and hierarchical design method presenting in the current research to quantitatively demonstrate smart education planning and lecture design, to identify and verify the feasibility model of smart education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3568739.3568810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3568739.3568810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信息技术的进步促进了新的(或改进的)教育和培训实践,为新方法和新工具创造了机会;同时,这些技术正在改变教育模式。过去,智能教育框架主要是定性研究,描述智能教育系统的概念框架(及其内涵)。虽然这些概念结构化的智能教育系统可以促进学生的学习、同伴和教师的互动以及教学实践,有助于从多个方面了解学生的状况和需求,并为学生提供实时的同步/异步指导和帮助,但遗憾的是,过去的许多定性研究仍然缺乏定量数据来验证E-Education规划的优先性。本文AHP所调查的专家均选自E-learning和信息技术领域,共14人。专家选择软件的结果发现,在智能教育系统规划中,主要标准的重要性顺序,从最重要到最不重要的分别是智能课堂功能,基于技术的学习系统(IoT, Metaverse),教学监控系统,智能学习的概念要素。子标准权重值显示了E-Learning教育规划的关键因素,依次为教育资源优化、教学差异化、学生合作学习、课程完成率、可靠的无线连接(Wi-Fi、IoT应用、可穿戴技术)。最后,最不重要的是基于学习理论的智能教学法、学习注意检测和系统数据备份。就贡献而言,据我们所知,很少有研究使用本研究中提出的AHP模型和分层设计方法来定量论证智能教育规划和讲座设计,识别和验证智能教育的可行性模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the Importance of Smart E-learning education system
Advances in information technology facilitate new (or improved) educational and training practices, creating opportunities for new methods and tools; while also, these technologies are changing the educational paradigm. In the past, smart education frameworks were mostly qualitative studies, describing the conceptual framework (and its connotations) of smart educational systems. Although these conceptually structured smart education systems can promote student learning, peer and teacher interaction, and teaching practice, which assist in understanding students’ status and needs in multiple ways and providing students with real-time synchronous/asynchronous guidance and help, unfortunately, many qualitative studies in the past still lack quantitative data to verify the priority of E-Education planning. The experts surveyed by AHP in this article are selected from E-learning and information technology, with a total of 14 people. The results from the software, Expert Choice, found that in the planning of the smart education system, the importance order of the main criteria, from the most important to the least were smart classroom function, technology-based learning system (IoT, Metaverse), teaching monitoring system, conceptual elements of smart learning, respectively. The sub-criteria weight values showed the key factors of E-Learning Education Planning, which in order were educational resources optimization, teaching is differentiated from person to person, students’ cooperation learning, course completion rate, reliable wireless connection (Wi-Fi, IoT apps, Wearable technology). Finally, the least important were smart pedagogies based on learning theory, learning attention detection, and system data backup. In terms of contribution, to our knowledge, very few studies have used the AHP model and hierarchical design method presenting in the current research to quantitatively demonstrate smart education planning and lecture design, to identify and verify the feasibility model of smart education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信