{"title":"尤利·艾肯瓦尔德的“自然象征主义”(论美学方法问题)","authors":"Elena A. Tacho-Godi","doi":"10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-188-203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers the methodological principles of Yu.I. Aykhenvald’s literary criticism. Attention is drawn to the relationship between Aykhenvald’s declared “immanent method” and “principled impressionism” and his own “philosophy of life”. It is proved that Aykhenvald’s version of “impressionism” is much closer to the theory of symbolism than it seemed to contemporaries and researchers. The analysis takes into account both the aesthetic “sympathies” (Apollon Grigoryev, Vladimir Solovyov, Oscar Wilde, Remy de Gourmont, Émile Faguet) and “antipathies” (Vissarion Belinsky, Vasily Rozanov), that influenced Aykhenvald’s interpretation of the heritage of literary critics, philosophers, and writers of the 19th century — Pushkin, Tolstoy, Chekhov.","PeriodicalId":130982,"journal":{"name":"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yuly Aykhenvald’s “Natural Symbolism” (on the Question of the Aesthetic Method)\",\"authors\":\"Elena A. Tacho-Godi\",\"doi\":\"10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-188-203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper considers the methodological principles of Yu.I. Aykhenvald’s literary criticism. Attention is drawn to the relationship between Aykhenvald’s declared “immanent method” and “principled impressionism” and his own “philosophy of life”. It is proved that Aykhenvald’s version of “impressionism” is much closer to the theory of symbolism than it seemed to contemporaries and researchers. The analysis takes into account both the aesthetic “sympathies” (Apollon Grigoryev, Vladimir Solovyov, Oscar Wilde, Remy de Gourmont, Émile Faguet) and “antipathies” (Vissarion Belinsky, Vasily Rozanov), that influenced Aykhenvald’s interpretation of the heritage of literary critics, philosophers, and writers of the 19th century — Pushkin, Tolstoy, Chekhov.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis\",\"volume\":\"228 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-188-203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Literature and Journalism in the Pre-revolutionary Era: Forms of Interaction and Methodology of Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-188-203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了《舆舆学》的方法论原则。艾肯瓦尔德的文学批评。人们注意到艾肯瓦尔德宣称的“内在方法”和“有原则的印象派”与他自己的“生活哲学”之间的关系。事实证明,艾肯瓦尔德的“印象主义”版本比同时代人和研究者所认为的更接近于象征主义理论。分析考虑到美学的“同情”(Apollon Grigoryev, Vladimir Solovyov, Oscar Wilde, Remy de Gourmont, Émile Faguet)和“反感”(Vissarion Belinsky, Vasily Rozanov),这影响了Aykhenvald对19世纪文学评论家,哲学家和作家遗产的解释-普希金,托尔斯泰,契诃夫。
Yuly Aykhenvald’s “Natural Symbolism” (on the Question of the Aesthetic Method)
The paper considers the methodological principles of Yu.I. Aykhenvald’s literary criticism. Attention is drawn to the relationship between Aykhenvald’s declared “immanent method” and “principled impressionism” and his own “philosophy of life”. It is proved that Aykhenvald’s version of “impressionism” is much closer to the theory of symbolism than it seemed to contemporaries and researchers. The analysis takes into account both the aesthetic “sympathies” (Apollon Grigoryev, Vladimir Solovyov, Oscar Wilde, Remy de Gourmont, Émile Faguet) and “antipathies” (Vissarion Belinsky, Vasily Rozanov), that influenced Aykhenvald’s interpretation of the heritage of literary critics, philosophers, and writers of the 19th century — Pushkin, Tolstoy, Chekhov.