拆分还是合并?:分割如何影响数字内容的消费和参与

Heeseung Andrew Lee, A. Choi, Tianshu Sun, Wonseok Oh
{"title":"拆分还是合并?:分割如何影响数字内容的消费和参与","authors":"Heeseung Andrew Lee, A. Choi, Tianshu Sun, Wonseok Oh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3859780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although serialized digital content is becoming increasingly popular in online platforms, authors and publishers have a limited understanding of the economic effects arising from content partitioning. This research investigated how partitioning serialized e-books affects the consumption patterns and engagement behaviors of consumers. Identical e-book titles were partitioned into two formats: small partitioning (SP), in which overlong stories are split into numerous short episodes per installment, and large partitioning (LP), in which narratives are divided into a few episodes, each delivered through longer storytelling. Drawing on the literature on resource partitioning and cognitive processing, we formulated hypotheses revolving around how these partitioning structures affect consumption quantity (i.e., the total number of words read) and progression rate (i.e., how far a consumer progresses into an entire serialized book). We then assessed the extent to which book length moderates the relationship between partitioning structures and consumption behaviors. Finally, attention was directed toward how partitioning structures influence engagement behaviors, such as consumption intensity (i.e., the use of textual annotations and highlights) and review propensity (i.e., the submission of book reviews). For empirical validations, we collaborated with a partner company in developing a consumption-tracing scheme, which keeps track of individual users’ consumption of and engagement with serialized content. The findings revealed that SP structures more effectively increase consumption quantity measured by the number of words read than do LP formats but that LP outcompetes SP in terms of elevating progression rate. As book length increases, the positive effects of SP and LP on consumption quantity and progression rate considerably diminish, respectively. Finally, LP is more effective than SP in inducing higher degrees of engagement measured on the basis of textual annotation and highlighting as well as the predisposition to submit book reviews. We provide scholarly and practical implications for how the partitioning of serialized content influences consumption and engagement patterns, which serve as essential resources in efforts to ensure the growth and sustainability of digital content platforms.","PeriodicalId":150569,"journal":{"name":"IO: Theory eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Split or to Merge?: How Partitioning Affects Consumption and Engagement with Digital Content\",\"authors\":\"Heeseung Andrew Lee, A. Choi, Tianshu Sun, Wonseok Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3859780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although serialized digital content is becoming increasingly popular in online platforms, authors and publishers have a limited understanding of the economic effects arising from content partitioning. This research investigated how partitioning serialized e-books affects the consumption patterns and engagement behaviors of consumers. Identical e-book titles were partitioned into two formats: small partitioning (SP), in which overlong stories are split into numerous short episodes per installment, and large partitioning (LP), in which narratives are divided into a few episodes, each delivered through longer storytelling. Drawing on the literature on resource partitioning and cognitive processing, we formulated hypotheses revolving around how these partitioning structures affect consumption quantity (i.e., the total number of words read) and progression rate (i.e., how far a consumer progresses into an entire serialized book). We then assessed the extent to which book length moderates the relationship between partitioning structures and consumption behaviors. Finally, attention was directed toward how partitioning structures influence engagement behaviors, such as consumption intensity (i.e., the use of textual annotations and highlights) and review propensity (i.e., the submission of book reviews). For empirical validations, we collaborated with a partner company in developing a consumption-tracing scheme, which keeps track of individual users’ consumption of and engagement with serialized content. The findings revealed that SP structures more effectively increase consumption quantity measured by the number of words read than do LP formats but that LP outcompetes SP in terms of elevating progression rate. As book length increases, the positive effects of SP and LP on consumption quantity and progression rate considerably diminish, respectively. Finally, LP is more effective than SP in inducing higher degrees of engagement measured on the basis of textual annotation and highlighting as well as the predisposition to submit book reviews. We provide scholarly and practical implications for how the partitioning of serialized content influences consumption and engagement patterns, which serve as essential resources in efforts to ensure the growth and sustainability of digital content platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3859780\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3859780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管连载数字内容在在线平台上越来越受欢迎,但作者和出版商对内容分割所产生的经济影响的理解有限。摘要本研究探讨了分界连载电子书对消费者消费模式和参与行为的影响。相同的电子书被分成两种格式:小分割(SP),将超长的故事分成每一部分的许多短章节;大分割(LP),将故事分成几部分,每一部分通过更长的故事讲述。根据有关资源划分和认知处理的文献,我们围绕这些划分结构如何影响消费量(即阅读的总字数)和进度率(即消费者进入整本连载书的进度)制定了假设。然后,我们评估了书籍长度在多大程度上调节了分配结构和消费行为之间的关系。最后,关注的焦点是如何划分结构影响参与行为,如消费强度(即,使用文本注释和高亮)和评论倾向(即,提交书评)。为了进行实证验证,我们与一家合作伙伴公司合作开发了一种消费跟踪方案,该方案跟踪个人用户对序列化内容的消费和参与情况。研究结果显示,与LP格式相比,SP格式更有效地增加了以阅读字数衡量的消耗量,但LP格式在提高进度速度方面优于SP格式。随着书长的增加,SP和LP对消费数量和进度率的积极作用分别显著减弱。最后,LP在诱导基于文本注释和高亮以及提交书评倾向的更高参与度方面比SP更有效。我们为序列化内容的划分如何影响消费和参与模式提供了学术和实践意义,这些模式是确保数字内容平台增长和可持续性的重要资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To Split or to Merge?: How Partitioning Affects Consumption and Engagement with Digital Content
Although serialized digital content is becoming increasingly popular in online platforms, authors and publishers have a limited understanding of the economic effects arising from content partitioning. This research investigated how partitioning serialized e-books affects the consumption patterns and engagement behaviors of consumers. Identical e-book titles were partitioned into two formats: small partitioning (SP), in which overlong stories are split into numerous short episodes per installment, and large partitioning (LP), in which narratives are divided into a few episodes, each delivered through longer storytelling. Drawing on the literature on resource partitioning and cognitive processing, we formulated hypotheses revolving around how these partitioning structures affect consumption quantity (i.e., the total number of words read) and progression rate (i.e., how far a consumer progresses into an entire serialized book). We then assessed the extent to which book length moderates the relationship between partitioning structures and consumption behaviors. Finally, attention was directed toward how partitioning structures influence engagement behaviors, such as consumption intensity (i.e., the use of textual annotations and highlights) and review propensity (i.e., the submission of book reviews). For empirical validations, we collaborated with a partner company in developing a consumption-tracing scheme, which keeps track of individual users’ consumption of and engagement with serialized content. The findings revealed that SP structures more effectively increase consumption quantity measured by the number of words read than do LP formats but that LP outcompetes SP in terms of elevating progression rate. As book length increases, the positive effects of SP and LP on consumption quantity and progression rate considerably diminish, respectively. Finally, LP is more effective than SP in inducing higher degrees of engagement measured on the basis of textual annotation and highlighting as well as the predisposition to submit book reviews. We provide scholarly and practical implications for how the partitioning of serialized content influences consumption and engagement patterns, which serve as essential resources in efforts to ensure the growth and sustainability of digital content platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信