在没有疫苗的情况下控制口蹄疫

J. Cummins
{"title":"在没有疫苗的情况下控制口蹄疫","authors":"J. Cummins","doi":"10.29011/2575-789x.000131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccination and depopulation are the methods for control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD). Another tool is needed to manage FMD Virus (FMDV) if sero-type vaccines are unavailable. The USDA plans to vaccinate cattle if there is a major FMDV outbreak in the USA, but this plan is hampered by the lack of a stockpile of FMDV vaccines to treat millions of animals in a timely fashion. In the absence of FMDV specific vaccines strategies to induce or administer interferon (IFN) might limit FMDV replication and disease in cattle and swine. A group of USDA Animal Research Service (ARS) scientists have reported that the FMDV establishes infection in susceptible cells/hosts by its ability to subvert key host defenses, specifically the inducible IFN response. FMDV inhibits production of IFN alpha (α) [l] and blocks a key IFNinducible, antiviral pathway, i.e.Double-Stranded RNA (dsRNA) dependent Protein Kinase R (PKR) [2]. Moreover, FMD Virion Protein 1 (VP1) has been specifically identified as a viral-origin IFN suppressor molecule by interacting with soluble resistancerelated calcium protein sorcin [3]. Since a key FMDV control method by host cells is suppression of IFNα production by FMDV-infected cells then exogenous treatment with IFNα or induction of endogenous IFN should help control FMD. Indeed, this vulnerability of FMDV to IFN has led to a novel viral disease control strategy using recombinant replication-defective human adenovirus 5 vector containing various species IFN genes. Results varied by species.","PeriodicalId":386740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vaccines, Immunology and Immunopathology","volume":"3 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease When Vaccines are Not Available\",\"authors\":\"J. Cummins\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2575-789x.000131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vaccination and depopulation are the methods for control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD). Another tool is needed to manage FMD Virus (FMDV) if sero-type vaccines are unavailable. The USDA plans to vaccinate cattle if there is a major FMDV outbreak in the USA, but this plan is hampered by the lack of a stockpile of FMDV vaccines to treat millions of animals in a timely fashion. In the absence of FMDV specific vaccines strategies to induce or administer interferon (IFN) might limit FMDV replication and disease in cattle and swine. A group of USDA Animal Research Service (ARS) scientists have reported that the FMDV establishes infection in susceptible cells/hosts by its ability to subvert key host defenses, specifically the inducible IFN response. FMDV inhibits production of IFN alpha (α) [l] and blocks a key IFNinducible, antiviral pathway, i.e.Double-Stranded RNA (dsRNA) dependent Protein Kinase R (PKR) [2]. Moreover, FMD Virion Protein 1 (VP1) has been specifically identified as a viral-origin IFN suppressor molecule by interacting with soluble resistancerelated calcium protein sorcin [3]. Since a key FMDV control method by host cells is suppression of IFNα production by FMDV-infected cells then exogenous treatment with IFNα or induction of endogenous IFN should help control FMD. Indeed, this vulnerability of FMDV to IFN has led to a novel viral disease control strategy using recombinant replication-defective human adenovirus 5 vector containing various species IFN genes. Results varied by species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vaccines, Immunology and Immunopathology\",\"volume\":\"3 7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vaccines, Immunology and Immunopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-789x.000131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vaccines, Immunology and Immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-789x.000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预防接种和减少种群是控制口蹄疫的主要方法。如果无法获得血清型疫苗,则需要另一种工具来管理口蹄疫病毒。美国农业部计划在美国发生口蹄疫大爆发时为牛接种疫苗,但由于缺乏口蹄疫疫苗储备,无法及时治疗数百万头牲畜,这一计划受到阻碍。在缺乏FMDV特异性疫苗的情况下,诱导或施用干扰素(IFN)的策略可能会限制牛和猪的FMDV复制和疾病。美国农业部动物研究服务局(ARS)的一组科学家报告说,FMDV通过破坏宿主的关键防御能力,特别是诱导性IFN反应,在易感细胞/宿主中建立感染。FMDV抑制IFN α (α)的产生[1]并阻断IFN诱导的关键抗病毒途径,即双链RNA (dsRNA)依赖性蛋白激酶R (PKR)[2]。此外,口蹄疫病毒粒子蛋白1 (VP1)通过与可溶性耐药相关钙蛋白sorcin相互作用被特异性鉴定为病毒源IFN抑制分子[3]。由于宿主细胞控制口蹄疫的一个关键方法是抑制感染口蹄疫的细胞产生IFNα,因此用IFNα进行外源性治疗或诱导内源性IFN应该有助于控制口蹄疫。事实上,FMDV对IFN的脆弱性导致了一种新的病毒性疾病控制策略,即使用含有多种IFN基因的重组复制缺陷型人腺病毒5载体。结果因物种而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease When Vaccines are Not Available
Vaccination and depopulation are the methods for control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD). Another tool is needed to manage FMD Virus (FMDV) if sero-type vaccines are unavailable. The USDA plans to vaccinate cattle if there is a major FMDV outbreak in the USA, but this plan is hampered by the lack of a stockpile of FMDV vaccines to treat millions of animals in a timely fashion. In the absence of FMDV specific vaccines strategies to induce or administer interferon (IFN) might limit FMDV replication and disease in cattle and swine. A group of USDA Animal Research Service (ARS) scientists have reported that the FMDV establishes infection in susceptible cells/hosts by its ability to subvert key host defenses, specifically the inducible IFN response. FMDV inhibits production of IFN alpha (α) [l] and blocks a key IFNinducible, antiviral pathway, i.e.Double-Stranded RNA (dsRNA) dependent Protein Kinase R (PKR) [2]. Moreover, FMD Virion Protein 1 (VP1) has been specifically identified as a viral-origin IFN suppressor molecule by interacting with soluble resistancerelated calcium protein sorcin [3]. Since a key FMDV control method by host cells is suppression of IFNα production by FMDV-infected cells then exogenous treatment with IFNα or induction of endogenous IFN should help control FMD. Indeed, this vulnerability of FMDV to IFN has led to a novel viral disease control strategy using recombinant replication-defective human adenovirus 5 vector containing various species IFN genes. Results varied by species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信